Tubulin heterodimers remain functional for one cell cycle after the inactivation of tubulin-folding cofactor D in fission yeast cells

Yeast

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 235-247

  Fedyanina, Olga S ^a   Book, Adam J ^b,d   Grischuk, Ekaterina L ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR HEMATOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF GENERAL PATHOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosome segregation; Microtubule; Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Tubulin dimers

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; HETERODIMER; PROTEIN COFACTOR D; TUBULIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL DEATH; CELL KINETICS; CELL MUTANT; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; DOWN REGULATION; ENZYME INACTIVATION; FUNGAL CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; LIFESPAN; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION;

CELL CYCLE; DIMERIZATION; GENE DELETION; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; TUBULIN;

BOVINAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

EID: 66449089499     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1663     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alfa C, Fantes P, Hyams J, et al. 1993. Experiments with Fission Yeast. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY; 57-59.
2. Beghin A, Galmarini CM, Dumontet C. 2007. Tubulin folding pathways: implication in the regulation of microtubule dynamics. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 7(8): 697-703.
3. Bhamidipati A, Lewis SA, Cowan NJ. 2000. ADP ribosylation factor-like protein 2 (Arl2) regulates the interaction of tubulinfolding cofactor D with native tubulin. J Cell Biol 149: 1087-1096.
4. Caplow M, Fee L. 2002. Dissociation of the tubulin dimer is extremely slow, thermodynamically very unfavorable, and reversible in the absence of an energy source. Mol Biol Cell 13: 2120-2131.
5. Cleveland DW, Lopata MA, Sherline P, Kirschner MW. 1981. Unpolymerized tubulin modulates the level of tubulin mRNAs. Cell 25: 537-546.
6. Cunningham LA, Kahn RA. 2008. Cofactor D functions as a centrosomal protein and is required for the recruitment of the γ-tubulin ring complex at centrosomes and organization of the mitotic spindle. J Biol Chem 283: 7155-7165.
7. Fedyanina OS, Grishchuk EL. 2004. Effect of overexpression of heterochromatin DNA-binding protein Abp1p on cell growth and minichromosome loss frequency in cofactor D mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Russian J Genet 40: 20-29.
8. Fedyanina OS, Mardanov PV, Tokareva EM, Grishchuk EL. 2006. Chromosome segregation in fission yeast with mutations in the tubulin folding cofactor D. Curr Genet 50: 281-294.
9. 1 phase. Genes Dev 12: 3408-3418.
10. Forsburg SL, Nurse P. 1991. Cell cycle regulation in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Annu Rev Cell Biol 7: 227-256.
11. Gao Y, Melki R, Walden PD, et al. 1994. A novel cochaperonin that modulates the ATPase activity of cytoplasmic chaperonin. J Cell Biol 125: 989-996.
12. Goshima G, Saitoh S, Yanagida M. 1999. Proper metaphase spindle length is determined by centromere proteins Mis12 and Mis6 required for faithful chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 13: 1664-1677.
13. Grishchuk EL, McIntosh JR. 1999. Sto1p, a fission yeast protein similar to tubulin folding cofactor E, plays an essential role in mitotic microtubule assembly. J Cell Sci 112: 1979-1088.
14. +, a novel Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene important for microtubule integrity. Genetics 149: 1251-1264.
15. + gene in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe can suppress temperature sensitivity of the nuc2-663 mutant, but not its sterility. Mol Biol (Moscow) 34: 809-815.
16. Grynberg M, Jaroszewski L, Godzik A. 2003. Domain analysis of the tubulin cofactor system: a model for tubulin folding and dimerization. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 46.
17. Hartwell LH. 1974. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. Bact Rev 38: 164-198.
18. Hartwell LH, Culotti J, Pringle JR, Reid BJ. 1974. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. Science 183: 46-51.
19. Heim R, Cubitt AB, Tsien RY. 1995. Improved green fluorescence. Nature 373: 663-664.
20. Hirata D, Masuda H, Eddison M, Toda T. 1998. Essential role of tubulin-folding cofactor D in microtubule assembly and its association with microtubules in fission yeast. EMBO J 17: 658-666.
21. Howard J, Hyman AA. 2003. Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end. Nature 422: 753-758.
22. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. 1990. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press: New York.
23. Katz W, Weinstein B, Solomon F. 1990. Regulation of tubulin levels and microtubule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: consequences of altered tubulin gene copy number. Mol Cell Biol 1990; 10: 5286-5294.
24. Kortazar D, Carranza G, Bellido J, et al. 2006. Native tubulinfolding cofactor E purified from baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells dissociates tubulin dimers. Protein Expr Purif 49: 196-202.
25. Kortazar D, Fanarraga ML, Carranza G, et al. 2007. Role of cofactors B (TBCB) and E (TBCE) in tubulin heterodimer dissociation. Exp Cell Res 313: 425-436.
26. Lacefield S, Margendantz M, Solomon F. 2006. Consequences of defective tubulin folding on heterodimer levels, mitosis and spindle morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173: 635-646.
27. Little M, Seehaus T. 1988. Comparative analysis of tubulin sequences. Comp Biochem Physiol B 90: 655-670.
28. Lopez-Fanarraga M, Avila J, Guasch A, et al. 2001. Review: postchaperonin tubulin folding cofactors and their role in microtubule dynamics. J Struct Biol 135: 219-229.
29. Marks J, Fankhauser C, Reymond A, Simanis V. 1992. Cytoskeletal and DNA structure abnormalities result from bypass of requirement for the cdc10 start gene in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci 101: 517-528.
30. Martin L, Fanarraga ML, Aloria K, Zabala JC. 2000. Tubulin folding cofactor D is a microtubule destabilizing protein. FEBS Lett 470: 93-95.
31. McIntosh JR, Grishchuk EL, West RR. 2002. Chromosomemicrotubule interactions during mitosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18: 193-219.
32. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In Methods in Enzymology, Guthrie C, Fink G (eds). Academic Press: New York; 795-823.
33. Novak B, Mitchison JM. 1989. The first transition point of the mutant cdc2.33 in the fission yeast Sz. pombe. J Cell Sci 94: 657-662.
34. Nurse P, Thuriaux P, Nasmyth K. 1976. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Gen Genet 146: 167-178.
35. Radcliffe PA, Hirata D, Vardy L, Toda T. 1999. Functional dissection and hierarchy of tubulin-folding cofactor homologues in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10: 2987-3001.
36. Radcliffe PA, Garcia MA, Toda T. 2000. The cofactor-dependent pathways for α- and β-tubulins in microtubule biogenesis are functionally different in fission yeast. Genetics 156: 93-103.
37. 1/S and forms specialized chromatin required for equal segregation. Cell 90: 131-143.
38. Sawin KE, Nurse P. 1998. Regulation of cell polarity by microtubules in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 142: 457-471.
39. Southern JA, Young DF, Heaney F, et al. 1991. Identification of an epitope on the P and V proteins of simian virus 5 that distinguishes between two isolates with different biological characteristics. J Gen Virol 72: 1551-1557.
40. + protein that is required for commitment to the cell cycle. J Cell Sci 92: 51-56.
41. Steinborn K, Maulbetsch C, Priester B, et al. 2002. The Arabidopsis PILZ group genes encode tubulin-folding cofactor orthologs required for cell division but not cell growth. Genes Dev 16: 959-971.
42. Symchen G. 1978. Cell cycle mutants. Annu Rev Genet 12: 161-191.
43. Szymanski D. 2002. Tubulin folding cofactors: half a dozen for a dimer. Curr Biol 12: R767-769.
44. Tanaka TU, Desai A. 2008. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 53-63.
45. Tian G, Huang Y, Rommelaere H, et al. 1996. Pathway leading to correctly folded beta-tubulin. Cell 86: 287-296.
46. Tian G, Bhamidipati A, Cowan NJ, Lewis SA. 1999. Tubulin folding cofactors as GTPase-activating proteins. GTP hydrolysis and the assembly of the α/β-tubulin heterodimer. J Biol Chem 274: 24054-24058.
47. Tian G, Lewis SA, Feierbach B, et al. 1997. Tubulin subunits exist in an activated conformational state generated and maintained by protein cofactors. J Cell Biol 138: 821-832.
48. Verkade HM, O'Connell MJ. 1998. Cut5 is a component of the UV-responsive DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Mol Gen Genet 260: 426-433.
49. Walczak CE, Heald R. 2008. Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly and function. Int Rev Cytol 265: 111-158.
50. Weinstein B, Solomon F. 1990. Phenotypic consequences of tubulin overproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: differences between alpha-tubulin and beta-tubulin. Mol Cell Biol 10: 5295-5304.
51. 1/S transition through early S phase. J Biol Chem 274: 37070-37078.