Automatic algorithm for monitoring systolic pressure variation and difference in pulse pressure

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1823-1829

  Pestel, Gunther ^a   Fukui, Kimiko ^a   Hartwich, Volker ^b   Schumacher, Peter M ^b   Vogt, Andreas ^b   Hiltebrand, Luzius B ^b   Kurz, Andrea ^c   Fujita, Yoshihisa ^d   Inderbitzin, Daniel ^b   Leibundgut, Daniel ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d KAWASAKI MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM;

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ALGORITHM; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BREATHING; BREATHING PATTERN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; RELIABILITY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ABDOMEN; AGED; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VOLUME; BREATHING MECHANICS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PULSE RATE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VOLUME; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PULSE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS;

EID: 66349129573     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a2a8bf     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Starling EH. The Linacre lecture on the law of the heart. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1918
2. Shoemaker WC, Montgomery ES, Kaplan E, Elwyn DH. Physiologic patterns in surviving and nonsurviving shock patients. Use of sequential cardiorespiratory variables in defining criteria for therapeutic goals and early warning of death. Arch Surg 1973;106:630-6
3. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2008;63:44-51
4. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005;103:25-32
5. Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F; Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003;238: 641-8
6. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:352-60
7. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:134-8
8. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, Easton P, Ferland A. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004;126:1563-8
9. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:746-55
10. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Kipnis E, Onimus J, Robin E, Lebuffe G, Decoene C, Pruvot FR, Vallet B. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:808-16
11. Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1987;67:498-502
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10
13. Denault AY, Gasior TA, Gorcsan J III, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR. Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive-pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999;116:176-86
14. Robotham JL, Cherry D, Mitzner W, Rabson JL, Lixfeld W, Bromberger-Barnea B. A re-evaluation of the hemodynamic consequences of intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 1983;11:783-93
15. Fujita Y, Sari A, Yamamoto T. On-line monitoring of systolic pressure variation. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1529-30
16. Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E, Schenke S, van Hout N, Sakka SG. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:194-9
17. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, Bauer C, Chiari P, Hénaine R, Lehot JJ. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1195-200
18. Perel A. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1031-3
19. Auler JO Jr, Galas F, Hajjar L, Santos L, Carvalho T, Michard F. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1201-6
20. Shelley KH. Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate. Anesth Analg 2007;105:S31-S36
21. Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, Rosamel P, Attof Y, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Does the Pleth variability index indicate the respiratory-induced variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg 2008;106:1189-94