Genetic diversity in somatic mutants of grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar Italia based on random amplified polymorphic DNA

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 28-38

  Maia, S H Z ^a   Mangolin, C A ^a   Collet, S A O ^a   Machado, M F P S ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF MARINGÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Polymorphism; Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers; Table grapes; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

DNA MARKER; PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLONE; CULTIVAR; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GRAPE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; MUTATION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM;

VITACEAE; VITIS VINIFERA;

BRAZIL; DNA, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; MUTATION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; VITIS;

EID: 66349119908     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/vol8-1gmr536     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barysheva IA, Tulaeva MI and Chisnikov VS (2003). Study of the intra-cultivar variability of grape DNA using RFLP and PCR methods. Tsitol. Genet. 37: 31-38.
2. Camargo UA (1994). Uvas do Brasil. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Uva e Vinho, Brasilia.
3. Crespan M (2004). Evidence on the evolution of polymorphism of microsatellite markers in varieties of Vitis vinifera L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 231-237.
4. Fanizza G, Colonna G, Resta P and Ferrara G (1999). The effect of the number of RAPD markers on the evaluation of genotypic distances in Vitis vinifera. Euphitica 107: 45-50.
5. Franks T, Botta R, Thomas MR and Franks J (2002). Chimerism in grapevines: implications for cultivar identity, ancestry and genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 192-199.
6. Hocquigny S, Pelsy F, Dumas V, Kindt S, et al. (2004). Diversification within grapevine cultivars goes through chimeric states. Genome 47: 579-589.
7. Hoisington D, Khairallah M and Gonzalez-de-Leon D (1994). Laboratory Protocols: CIMMYT Applied Molecular Genetics Laboratory. 2nd edn. CIMMYT, Mexico.
8. Kishino AY and Mashima M (1980). Uva Vitis vinifera L. Fundacao Instituto Agronomico do Parana, Manual Agropecuario do Parana, Londrina, 138-177.
9. Kobayashi S, Ishimaru M, Ding CK, Yakushiji H, et al. (2001). Comparison of UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) gene sequences between white grapes (Vitis vinifera) and their sports with red skin. Plant Sci. 160: 543-550.
10. Kobayashi S, Goto-Yamamoto N and Hirochika H (2004). Retrotransposon- induced mutations in grape skin color. Science 304: 982.
11. Lodhi MA, Ye GN, Weeden NF and Reisch BI (1994). A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars and Vitis species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 12: 6-13.
12. Luo S and He P (2001). Discrimination of wild grapes native to China by RAPD markers. Vitis 40: 163-168.
13. Moncada X, Pelsy F, Merdinoglu D and Hinrichsen P (2006). Genetic diversity and geographical dispersal in grapevine clones revealed by microsatellite markers. Genome 49: 1459-1472.
14. Mori K, Goto-Yamamoto N, Kitayama M and Hashizume K (2007). Loss of anthocyanins in red-wine grape under high temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 1935-1945.
15. Oliveira-Collet SA, Collet MA and Machado MFPS (2005). Differential gene expression for isozymes in somatic mutants of Vitis vinifera L. (Vitaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 33: 691-703.
16. Orasmo GR, Oliveira-Collet SA, Lapenta AS and de Fatima PSM (2007). Biochemical and genetic polymorphisms for carboxylesterase and acetylesterase in grape clones of Vitis vinifera L. (Vitaceae) cultivars. Biochem. Genet. 45: 663-670.
17. Regner F, Stadlbauer A, Eisenheld C and Kaserer H (2000). Genetic relationship among pinots and related cultivars. Am. J. Enol. Vit. 51: 7-14.
18. Rohlf FJ (1989). NTSYS-pc Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1.50. New York Exeter Publ., New York.
19. Sousa JSI (1996). Uvas para o Brasil. Revista Anual de Piracicaba. 2nd edn. FEALQ, Piracicaba.
20. Stavrakakis MN and Biniari K (1998). Genetic study of grape cultivars belonging to the Muscat family by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Vitis 37: 119-122.
21. Tamhankar SA, Patil SG and Rao VS (2001). Assessment of the genetic diversity of some important grape genotypes in India using RAPD markers. Vitis 40: 157-161.
22. Tautz D (1989). Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA marker. Nucleic. Acids Res. 17: 6463-6471.
23. Thomas MR, Matsumoto S, Cain P and Scott NS (1993). Repetitive DNA of grapevine: classes present and sequences suitable for cultivar identification. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 173-180.
24. Tschammer J and Zyprian E (1994). Molecular characterization of grapevine cultivars of Riesling-type and of closely related Burgundies. Vitis 33: 249-250.
25. Ulanovsky S, Gogorcena Y, Martinez de Toda F and Ortiz JM (2002). Use of molecular markers in detection of synonymies and homonymies in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci. Hort. 92: 241-254.
26. Walker AR, Lee E, Bogs J, McDavid DA, et al. (2007). White grapes arose through the mutation of two similar and adjacent regulatory genes. Plant J. 49: 772-785.
27. Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, et al. (1990). DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535.
28. Ye GNG, Soylemezoglu G, Weeden NF, Lamboy WF, et al. (1998). Analysis of the relationship between grapevine cultivars, sports and clones via DNA fingerprinting. Vitis 37: 33-38.
29. Zoghlami N, Mliki A and Ghorbel A (2001). Evaluation of genetic diversity among Tunisian grapevines by RAPD markers. Vitis 40: 31-37.