NMR-derived solution structure of SUMO from Drosophila melanogaster (dSmt3)

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1046-1050

  Kumar, Dinesh ^a   Misra, Jyoti Ranjan ^a   Kumar, Ashutosh ^a   Chugh, Jeetender ^a   Sharma, Shilpy ^a   Hosur, Ramakrishna V ^a  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Post translational modification; Smt3; Solution structure; SUMOylation; Ubiquitin like proteins

Indexed keywords

SUMO PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SOLUTIONS; UBIQUITINS;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 66149189209     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22389     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ronald T. Hay SUMO: a history of modification. Mol Cell 2005;18:1-12. (Pubitemid 40444643)
2. Hochstrasser M. Biochemistry: all in the ubiquitin family. Science 2000;289:563-564.
3. Dohmen RJ. SUMO protein modification. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1695:113-131. (Pubitemid 39574970)
4. Mishra RK, Jatiani SS, Simhadri VR, Kumar A, Mittal R, Hosur RV. Dynamin interacts with members of the sumoylation machinery. J Biol Chem 2004;279:31445-31454. (Pubitemid 39037812)
5. Anckar J, Sistonen L. SUMO: getting it on. Biochem Soc Trans 2007;35:1409-1413.
6. Lehembre F, Badenhorst P, Muller S, Travers A, Schweisguth F, Dejean A. Covalent modification of the transcriptional repressor tramtrack by the ubiquitin-related protein Smt3 in Drosophila flies. Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:1072-1082. (Pubitemid 30044244)
7. Bhaskar V, Valentine SA, Courey AJ. A functional interaction between dorsal and components of the Smt3 conjugation machinery. J Biol Chem 2000;275:4033-4040. (Pubitemid 30094632)
8. Talamillo A, Sanchez J, Cantera R, Perez C, Martin D, Caminero E, Barrio R. Smt3 is required for Drosophila melanogaster metamorphosis. Development 2008;135:1659-1668.
9. 13C resonance assignment of folded and 8M urea denatured state of SUMO from Drosophila melanogaster. Biomol NMR Assign 2008;2:13-15.
10. Keller R. The computer aided resonance assignment tutorial. CANTINA, Verlag: Goldau, Switzerland; 2004.
11. Guntert P, Qian YQ, Otting G, Muller M, Gehring W, Wuthrich K. Structure determination of the Antp (C39 - S) homeodomain from nuclear magnetic resonance data in solution using a novel strategy for the structure calculation with the programs DIANA, CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. J Mol Biol 1991;217:531-540. (Pubitemid 121003299)
12. Guntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wuthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 1997;273:283-298. (Pubitemid 27460230)
13. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1781-1802. (Pubitemid 43078511)
14. Mackerell AD. Recent developments in the CHARMM all-atom force field for biological molecules. Abstr Paper Am Chem Soc 2000;220:U279.
15. Laskowski RA, Rullmannn JA, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR 1996;8:477-486. (Pubitemid 126706801)
16. Bhattacharya A, Tejero R, Montelione GT. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia. Prot: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2007;66:778-795. (Pubitemid 46273064)
17. DeLano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific: San Carlos, CA; 2002.
18. Cang HX, Chen ME, Nymeyer H. NOC: a free molecular explorer for protein structure visualization, validation and analysis. Florida: Nymeyer's Group, Institute of Molecular Biology, Florida State University; 2006.
19. Alexeev D, Bury SM, Turner MA, Ogunjobi OM, Muir TW, Ramage R, Sawyer L. Synthetic, structural and biological studies of the ubiquitin system: chemically synthesized and native ubiquitin fold into identical three-dimensional structures. Biochem J 1994;299 (Pt 1): 159-163. (Pubitemid 24106303)
20. Sheng W, Liao X. Solution structure of a yeast ubiquitin-like protein Smt3: the role of structurally less defined sequences in proteinprotein recognitions. Prot Sci 2002;11:1482-1491. (Pubitemid 34547219)
21. Bayer P, Arndt A, Metzger S, Mahajan R, Melchior F, Jaenicke R, Becker J. Structure determination of the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1. J Mol Biol 1998;280:275-286. (Pubitemid 28325519)
22. Huang WC, Ko TP, Li SS, Wang AH. Crystal structures of the human SUMO-2 protein at 1.6 A and 1.2 A resolution: implication on the functional differences of SUMO proteins. Eur J Biochem 2004;271:4114-4122. (Pubitemid 39423109)
23. Ding H, Xu Y, Chen Q, Dai H, Tang Y, Wu J, Shi Y. Solution structure of human SUMO-3 C47S and its binding surface for Ubc9. Biochemistry 2005;44:2790-2799. (Pubitemid 40293655)
24. Sippl MJ. On distance and similarity in fold space. Bioinformatics 2008;24:872-873.
25. Sippl MJ, Wiederstein M. A note on difficult structure alignment problems. Bioinformatics 2008;24:426-427.
26. Bayer P, Arndt A, Metzger S, Mahajan R, Melchior F, Jaenicke R, Becker J. Structure determination of the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1. J Mol Biol 1998;280:275-286. (Pubitemid 28325519)
27. Bayer P, Arndt A, Metzger S, Mahajan R, Melchior F, Jaenicke R, Becker J. Structure determination of the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1. J Mol Biol 1998;280:275-286. (Pubitemid 28325519)
28. Liu Q, Jin C, Liao X, Shen Z, Chen DJ, Chen Y. The binding interface between an E2 (UBC9) and a ubiquitin homologue (UBL1). J Biol Chem 1999;274:16979-16987. (Pubitemid 129519025)
29. Tatham MH, Kim S, Yu B, Jaffray E, Song J, Zheng J, Rodriguez MS, Hay RT, Chen Y. Role of an N-terminal site of Ubc9 in SUMO-1, -2, and -3 binding and conjugation. Biochemistry 2003;42:9959-9969.