Selective anodic desorption for assembly of different thiol monolayers on the individual electrodes of an array

Langmuir

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 6517-6521

  Collman, James P ^a   Hosseini, Ali ^a   Eberspacher, Todd A ^a   Chidsey, Christopher E D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSE PROXIMITY; ELECTROACTIVE SPECIES; ELECTROCHEMICAL STUDIES; ELECTRON TRANSFER; ELECTRON TRANSFER RATES; FERROCENE; INTERDIGITATED ARRAYS; PLUG-AND-PLAY; THIOL MONOLAYER;

ACETYLENE; CATALYTIC OXIDATION; DESORPTION; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; IRON COMPOUNDS; LIGHTING; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS;

ELECTROCHEMICAL ELECTRODES;

THIOL DERIVATIVE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRODE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADSORPTION; ELECTRODES; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 66149177843     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la8043363     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Postlethwaite, T. A.; Hutchison, J. E.; Murray, R.; Fosset, B.; Amatore, C. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68(17), 2951-2958.
2. Willner, I.; Katz, E. I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39(1), 1180-1218.
3. Schreiber, F. J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 2004, 16(28), R881-R900.
4. Collman, J. P.; Devaraj, N. K.; Chidsey, C. E. D. Langmuir 2004, 20(4), 1051-1053.
5. Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41(14), 2596.
6. Devaraj, N. K.; Decreau, R. A.; Ebina, W.; Collman, J. P.; Chidsey, C. E. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110(32), 15955-15962.
7. Devaraj, N. K.; Dinolfo, P. H.; Chidsey, C. E. D.; Collman, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128(6), 1794-1795.
8. Chidsey, C. E. D.; Loiacono, D. N. Langmuir 1990, 5(3), 682-691.
9. 6.
10. The initial deposition of the longer thiols is advantageous because they form more stable monolayers on Au and therefore are less perturbed by the anodic desorption of the thiols on the adjacent electrode. This strategy also minimizes the possibility of exchange with the second thiol solution.
11. 6. However, this process is less damaging if electrode 1 contains the azide functionality.
12. 6 is recommended after the click reaction to ensure a clean surface for deposition of the second monolayer.
13. Chidsey, C. E. D. Science 1991, 251(4996), 919-922.
14. Wang, I.; Jiang, M.; Kawde, A. M.; Polsky, R. Langmuir 2000, 16(25), 9687-9689.
15. 4 concentrations.
16. The method described here uses a chemical reductant to form the Cu(I) catalyst for the "click" reaction. This approach is complementary to the electrochemical activation and deactivation of the coupling catalyst for a selective "click" reaction on a given electrode (ref 7).
17. Love, J. C.; Estroff, L. A.; Kriebel, J. K.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105(4), 1103-1169.
18. Porter, M. D.; Bright, T. B.; Allara, D. L.; Chidsey, C. E. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109(12), 3559-3568.
19. Ma, F. Y.; Lennox, R. B. Langmuir 2000, 16(15), 6188-6190.