The effect of tramadol on the rat sciatic nerve conduction: A numerical analysis and conduction velocity distribution study

Yakugaku Zasshi

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 485-493

  Dalkilic, Nizamettin ^a   Tuncer, Seckin ^a   Bariskaner, Hulagu ^a   Kiziltan, Erhan ^b  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Compound action potential; Conduction velocity distribution; Rat sciatic nerve; Tramadol

Indexed keywords

TRAMADOL; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHRONAXY; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EXCITABILITY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE FIBER; NONHUMAN; RAT; SCIATIC NERVE; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; DOSE RESPONSE; IN VITRO STUDY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANIMALS; DEPRESSION, CHEMICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MALE; NEURAL CONDUCTION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SCIATIC NERVE; TRAMADOL;

EID: 66149124525     PISSN: 00316903     EISSN: 13475231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1248/yakushi.129.485     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Katsuki R., Fujita T., Koga A., Liu T., Nakatsuka M., Kumamoto E., Br. J. Pharmacol., 149(3), 319-327 (2006).
2. Mizuta K., Fujita T., Nakatsuka T., Kumamoto E., Life Sciences, 83, 198-207 (2008).
3. Rubinstein C. T., Shrager P., Brain Res., 524, 303-312 (1990).
4. Wells M. D., Gazoni S. N., IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46(9) 1107-1120 (1999).
5. Krarup C., Muscle and Nerve, 29, 465-483 (2004).
6. Dalkilic N., Pehlivan F., Int. J. Neurosci., 112, 913-930 (2002).
7. Cummins K. L., Dorfman L. J., Perkel D. H., Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 46, 522-646 (1979).
8. Cummins K. L., Dorfman L. J., Perkel D. H., Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 46, 647-658 (1979).
9. Papadopolulou F. A., Panas S. M., Med. Eng. Phys., 21, 499-503 (1999).
10. Keynes R. D., Aidley D. J., "Nerve and Muscle'', 3 ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001, pp. 1-84.
11. Pehlivan F., "Biyofizik (Biophysics)'', Hacettepe-Tas Kitapcilik, Ankara, 1997.
12. Dalkilic N., Kiziltan E., Pehlivan F., Kose K., Yakugaku Zasshi, 123(12), 1031-7 (2003).
13. Kramarenko A. V., Tan U., Int. J. Neurosci., 112, 489-499 (2002).
14. Hobbie R. K., Roth B. J., "Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology'', 4 th ed., Springer, New York, 2007, pp. 285-323.
15. Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T., Flannery B. P., "NumericalRecipes in C'', Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 496-608.
16. Dalkilic N., Pehlivan F., Int. J. Neurosci., 112, 1013-1026, 2002.
17. Kiziltan E., Dalkilic N., Gueny F. B., Pehlivan F., Int. J. Neurosci., 117, 203-213 (2007).
18. North R. A., "Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology'', vol. 104. chap. Opioid actions on membrane ion channels. Ed. by Herz A, Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 773-797.
19. Yaksh T. L., "Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology'', vol. 104. chap. The spinal actions of opioids. Ed. by Herz A., Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 53-90.
20. Kohno T., Kumamoto E., Higashi H., Shimoji K., Yoshimura M., J. Physiol., 518(pt 3), 803-813 (1999).
21. Yuge O., Matsumoto M., Kitahata L. M., Collins J. G., Senami M., Anesth. and Analges., 64(7), 667-671 (1985).
22. Gissen A. J., Gugino L. D., Datta S., Miller J., Covino B. G., Anesthe. and Analges., 66, 1272-1276 (1987).
23. Mert T., Gunes Y., Guven M., Gunay J., Oz- cengiz O., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 439(1 -3), 77-81 (2002).
24. Tsai Y. C., Chang P. J., Jou I. M., Anesthe. and Analges., 92, 1547-1551 (2001).
25. Taylor P. K. Muscle andNerve, 16, 1181-1187 (1993).
26. Quinteiro R. A., Biagetti M. O., de Forteza E., J. Cardiovas. Pharmacol., 15, 29-36 (1990).
27. Dalkilic N., Pehlivan F., Journal of Ankara Medical School, 16, 1147-1155 (1994).
28. Ansselin A. D., Fink T., Davey D. F., Acta Chururgica Austriaca, 30, 19-24 (1998).
29. Kovacs Z., Jonson T., Sax D., "Conduction velocity distribution: A population approach to electrophysiology of nerve'' chap. Nerve conduction velocity distributions: A method assuming noisy estimates of the single fiber electrical response. Eds. by Dorfman L. J., Cummins K. L., Leifer L. J., New York, 1981, pp. 85-111.
30. Dalkilic N., Bariskaner H., Demirel I., Dogan N., Ilhan B., Int. J. Neurosci., 114, 1-16 (2003).