Conduction velocity distribution: Early diagnostic tool for peripheral neuropathies

International Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 203-213

  Kiziltan, Erhan ^a   Dalkilic, Nizamettin ^b   Guney, Figen Bayramoglu ^b   Pehlivan, Ferit ^c  

^a ZONGULDAK KARAELMAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Compound action potential; Conduction velocity distribution; Demyelination; Sciatic nerve

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMYELINATING NEUROPATHY; DEMYELINATION; FROG; HISTOGRAM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MYELINATED NERVE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; SCIATIC NERVE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ANURA; DEMYELINATING DISEASES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; LYSOPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINES; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; REACTION TIME; SCIATIC NERVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846953587     PISSN: 00207454     EISSN: 15635279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207450600582496     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ansselin, A. D., Fink, T., & Davey, D. F. (1998). An alternative to nerve grafts in peripheral nerve repair: Nerve guides seeded with adult Schwann cells. Acta Chururgica Austriaca, 30, 19-24.
2. Cummins, K. L., Dorfman, L. J., & Perkel, D. H. (1979a). Nerve fiber conduction velocity distributions. I. Estimation based on the single-fiber and compound action potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 46, 522-646.
3. Cummins, K. L., Dorfman, L. J., & Perkel, D. H. (1979b). Nerve fiber conduction velocity distribution. II. Estimation based on two compound action potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 46, 647-658.
4. Dalkilic, N., & Pehlivan, F. (2002a). Comparison of fiber diameter distribution deduced by modelling compound action potentials recorded by extracellular and suction techniques. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 913-930.
5. Dalkilic, N., & Pehlivan, F. (2002b). A correction procedure for the volume conductor effect in the compound action potential recorded from isolated nerve trunk. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1013-1026.
6. Dalkilic, N., Pehlivan, F., & Kiziltan, E. (2003). Does collagenase effect the electrophysiological parameters of nerve trunk? Yakugaku Zasshi. 123, 1031-1037.
7. Delisa, J. A., Lee, H. J., Baran, E. M., Ka-Siu, Lai., & Spielholz, N. (1994). Manual of never conduction velocity and clinical neurophysiology. (pp. 1-21). New York: Raven Press.
8. Griffin, J. W., Stocks, E. A., Fahnestock, K., Praagh, A. V., & Trapp, B. D. (1990). Schwann cell proliferation following lysolecithin-induced demyelination. Journal of Neurocytology, 19, 367-384.
9. Higashimori, H., Whetzel, T. P., Mahmood, T., & Carlsen, R. C. (2005). Peripheral axon caliber and conduction velocity are decreased after burn injury in mice. Muscle and Nerve, 31, 610-620.
10. Kelly, J. J. (2004). The evaluation of peripheral neuropathy. Part 1: Clinical and laboratory evidence. Review. Neurological Disorders, 1, 133-140.
11. Kiziltan, E. (1995). Interpretation of the effects of experimental demyelination on compound action potential by numerical analysis methods. Dissertation, Ankara University School of Medicine (pp. 59-66).
12. Koles, Z. J., & Rasminsky, M. (1972). A computer simulation of conduction in demyelinated nerve fibers. Journal of Physiology, 227, 351-364.
13. Krarup, C. (2004). Compound sensory action potential in normal and pathological human nerve. Muscle and Never, 29, 465-483.
14. Krarup, C., & Buchthal, F. (1985). Conduction studies in peripheral nerve. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol., 7, 319-323.
15. Morita, G., Tu, Y. X., Okajima, Y., Honda, S., & Tomita, Y. (2002). Estimation of the conduction velocity distribution of human sensory never fibers. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 12, 37-43.
16. Nelson, R. M., & Currier, D. P. (1991). Electrophysiological evaluation: An overview. In R. M. Nelson & D. P. Currier (Eds.), Clinical Electrotheraphy, Second Edition (pp. 331-360). California: Appleton & Lange.
17. Papadopolulou, F. A., & Panas, S. M. (1999a). Bispectral de-noising of the compound action potential for estimation of the nerve conduction velocity distribution. Medical Engineering and Physics, 21, 499-503.
18. Papadopoulou, F. A., & Panas, S. M. (1999b). Estimation of the nerve conduction velocity distribution using partial bicepstral information. IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher Order Statistics (SPW-HOS'99) (p. 161).
19. Pehlivan, F., Dalkilic, N., & Kiziltan, E. (2004). Does conduction velocity distribution change along the nerve? Medical Engineering and Physics, 26, 395-401.
20. Reutsky, S., Rossoni, E., & Tirozzi, B. (2003). Conduction in bundles of demyelinated nerve fibers. Computer Simulation. Biological Cybernetics, 89, 439-448.
21. Ritchie, J. M., Rang, H. P., & Pellegrino, R. (1981). Sodium and potassium channels in demyelinated and remyelinated mammalian nerve. Nature, 294, 257-259.
22. Shrager, P. (1987). The distribution of sodium and potassium channels in single demyelinated axons of the frog. Journal of Physiology, 392, 587-602.
23. Shrager, P. (1988). Ionic channels and signal conduction in single remyelinating frog nerve fibres. Journal of Physiology, 404, 695-712.
24. Tan, M., & Tan, U. (2003). Early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using double-shock stimulation of peripheral nerves. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1419-1422.
25. Tuckwell, H. C. (1999). Voltage clamp calculation for myelinated and demyelinated axons. European Biophysical Journal, 22, 71-77.
26. Vasconcelos, B. C. E., Escoda, C. G., Vasconcellos, R. J. H., & Neves, R. F. N. (2003). Conduction velocity of the rabbit facial nerve:Anoninvasive functional evaluation. Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira, 17(2), 126-131.