Information management for materials supply systems design

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2217-2229

  Johansson, Eva ^a  

^a School of Engineering   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; Information management; Materials supply; Product development project

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; LITTLE RESEARCH; MULTIPLE SOURCE; ONE DIMENSION; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; SUPPLY SYSTEM;

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING; MATERIALS; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 66149120164     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802036257     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Clark, K.B. and Fujimoto, T., 1991. Product development performance: strategy, organization, andmanagement in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
2. Clausing, D., 1994. Total quality development: a step-by-step guide to world-class concurrent engineering. New York, NY: ASME Press.
3. Ellram, L.M., Tate, W.L., and Carter, C.R., 2007. Product-process-supply chain: an integrative approach to three-dimensional concurrent engineering. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37 (4), 305-330.
4. Eppinger, S.D., et al., 1994. A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design, 6 (1), 1-13.
5. Fine, C.H., 1998. Reading, Clock speed. MA: Perseus Books.
6. Fixson, S.K., 2005. Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions. Journal of Operations Management, 23 (3-4), 345-369.
7. Haque, B., 2003. Problems in concurrent new product development: an in-depth comparative study of three companies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14 (3), 191-207.
8. Hauptman, O. and Hirji, K.K., 1996. The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43 (2), 153-164.
9. Hult, G.T.M. and Swan, K.S., 2003. A research agenda for the nexus of product development and supply chain management processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20 (5), 427-428.
10. Johansson, E. and Johansson, M.I., 2004. The information gap between design engineering and materials supply systems design. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (17), 3787-3801.
11. Johansson, E. and Medbo, L., 2004. On the use of product data in the design of the materials supply system. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15 (7), 641-650.
12. Johansson, E., Bellgran, M., and Johansson, M.I., 2006. Evaluation of materials supply systems during product development projects. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (5), 903-917.
13. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., and Doll, W., 2001. Concurrent engineering and its consequences. Journal of Operations Management, 19 (1), 97-115.
14. Krishnan, V., Eppinger, S.D., and Whitney, D.E., 1997. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Science, 43 (4), 437-451.
15. Lee, Y.W., et al., 2002. AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management, 40 (2), 133-146.
16. Loch, C.H. and Terwiesch, C, 1998. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Science, 44 (8), 1032-1048.
17. Medbo, L., 1999. Materials supply and product descriptions for assembly systems: design and operation. Thesis (PhD). Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
18. Oehlmann, R., Thoben, K.-D., and Weber, F., 1997. Capturing and assessing formal interaction at task level in product development. Computers in Industry, 33 (2-3), 179-189.
19. Rungtusanatham, M. and Forza, C, 2005. Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions. Part A: topic motivation, performance implications, and article review process. Journal of Operations Management, 23 (3-4), 257-265.
20. Smith, P.G. and Reinertsen, D.G., (1998). Developing products in half the time: new rules, new tools, New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
21. Su, J.C.P., Chang, Y.-L., and Ferguson, M., 2005. Evaluation of postponement structures to accommodate mass customisation. Journal of Operations Management, 23 (3), 305-318.
22. Susman, G.I. and Dean, J.W.J., 1992. Development of a model for predicting design for manufacturability effectiveness, In: G.I. Susman, ed. Integrating design and manufacturing for competitive advantage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 207-227.
23. Terwiesch, C., Loch, C.H., and De Meyer, A., 2002. Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: alternative coordination strategies. Organization Science, 13 (4), 402-419.
24. Thomke, S. and Fujimoto, T., 2000. The effect of 'front-loading' problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17 (2), 128-142.
25. Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B., 1992. Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality. New York, NY: Free Press.
26. Yassine, A. and Braha, D., 2003. Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11 (3), 165-176.
27. Yassine, A. A., Sreenivas, R.S., and Zhu, J., 2008. Managing the exchange of information in product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 184 (1), 311-326.