Decentralized ℋ∞ controller design for large-scale civil structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 377-401

  Wang, Yang ^a   Lynch, Jerome P ^b   Law, Kincho H ^c  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Decentralized control; Feedback structural control; H infinity control; Smart structures

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BRIDGES; CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FEEDBACK; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES; PASSIVE NETWORKS; PNEUMATIC CONTROL EQUIPMENT; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

CIVIL STRUCTURE; CONTINUOUS TIME; CONTROL DEVICE; CONTROL PERFORMANCE; CONTROL SOLUTIONS; CONTROLLER DESIGNS; DECENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE; DECENTRALIZED CONTROLLER; DISCRETE-TIME; FEED-BACK LOOP; H-INFINITY CONTROL; KEY ISSUES; LOW-COST SENSORS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; PASSIVE CONTROL; REDUCED SYSTEMS; SAMPLING PERIOD; SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL DEVICES; SMART STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL CONTROL SYSTEM;

CONTROLLERS;

ACTIVE CONTROL; CONTROL SYSTEM; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL CONTROL; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 66149115256     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.862     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Soong TT. Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice. Wiley: Harlow, Essex, England, 1990.
2. Spencer Jr BF, Nagarajaiah S. State of the art of structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129(7):845-856.
3. Yao JTP. Concept of structural control. Journal of Structural Division (ASCE) 1972; 98(7):1567-1574.
4. Housner GW, Bergman LA, Caughey TK, Chassiakos AG, Claus RO, Masri SF, Skelton RE, Soong TT, Spencer Jr BF, Yao JTP. Structural control: past, present, and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1997; 123(9):897-971.
5. Chu SY, Soong TT, Reinhorn AM. Active, Hybrid, Semi-active Structural Control: A Design, Implementation Handbook. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
6. Soong TT, Spencer Jr BF. Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures 2002; 24(3):243-259.
7. Sandell Jr N, Varaiya P, Athans M, Safonov M. Survey of decentralized control methods for large scale systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1978; 23(2):108-128.
8. Siljak DD. Decentralized Control of Complex Systems. Academic Press: Boston, 1991.
9. Lunze J. Feedback Control of Large Scale Systems. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992.
10. Shimizu K, Yamada T, Tagami J, Kurino H. Vibration tests of actual buildings with semi-active switching oil damper. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1-6 August, 2004.
11. Kurino H, Tagami J, Shimizu K, Kobori T. Switching oil damper with built-in controller for structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129(7):895-904.
12. Wang Y, Swartz RA, Lynch JP, Law KH, Lu K-C, Loh C-H. Decentralized civil structural control using real-time wireless sensing and embedded computing. Smart Structures and Systems 2007; 3(3):321-340.
13. Wang Y. Wireless sensing and decentralized control for civil structures: theory and implementation. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2007.
14. Skogestad S, Postlethwaite I. Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design. Wiley: Chichester, West Sussex, England, 2005.
15. Balandin DV, Kogan MM. LMI-based optimal attenuation of multi-storey building oscillations under seismic excitations. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2005; 12(2):213-224.
16. ∞ control considering actuator saturation. I: theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1996; 122(10):976-983.
17. ∞ control for seismic-excited buildings with acceleration feedback. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1995; 121(9):994-1002.
18. ∞ output feedback control systems with time delay. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2006; 132(10): 1096-1105.
19. ∞-control of time-delay systems for the benchmark problem. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(9):957-976.
20. Johnson EA, Voulgaris PG, Bergman LA. Multiobjective optimal structural control of the Notre Dame building model benchmark. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(11):1165-1187.
21. ∞ controller and SAIVF device. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(8):921-942.
22. ∞-based control strategies for civil engineering structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2004; 11(3):223-237.
23. Wang S-G. Robust active control for uncertain structural systems with acceleration sensors. Journal of Structural Control 2003; 10(1):59-76.
24. ∞ control considering actuator saturation. II: applications. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1996; 122(10):984-993.
25. Boyd S, El Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishnan V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
26. Zhou K, Doyle JC, Glover K. Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
27. Gahinet P. LMI Control Toolbox for Use with MATLAB. MathWorks Inc.: Natick, MA, 1995.
28. Grant M, Boyd S. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming (web page and software). http://stanford.edu/~boyd/cvx (18 June 2008).
29. Franklin GF, Powell JD, Workman ML. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems. Addison-Wesley: Menlo Park, CA, 1998.
30. Kim J-H, Jabbari F. Actuator saturation and control design for buildings under seismic excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002; 128(4):403-412.
31. Barroso LR, Chase JG, Hunt S. Resettable smart dampers for multi-level seismic hazard mitigation of steel moment frames. Journal of Structural Control 2003; 10(1):41-58.
32. Kannan S, Uras HM, Aktan HM. Active control of building seismic response by energy dissipation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics1995; 24(5):747-759.
33. ∞ Methods. Addison-Wesley Longman: Menlo Park, CA, 1999.
34. Spencer Jr BF, Christenson RE, Dyke SJ. Next generation benchmark control problem for seismically excited buildings. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 29 June-2 July 1998.
35. Hatada T, Kobori T, Ishida M, Niwa N. Dynamic analysis of structures with Maxwell model. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(2):159-176.