Dynamic analysis of structures with Maxwell model

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 159-176

  Hatada, Tomohiko ^a   Kobori, Takuji ^a   Ishida, Masatoshi ^a   Niwa, Naoki ^a  

^a KAJIMA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Direct integration; Dynamic analysis; Maxwell model; Stability and accuracy; Tall building; Viscous damper

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; TALL BUILDINGS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; VIBRATION CONTROL;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MAXWELL MODEL; MULTI DEGREE OF FREEDOM; VISCOUS DAMPERS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 0034143698     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200002)29:2<159::AID-EQE895>3.0.CO;2-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kobori T. Application of the high damping device (HiDAM) to high-rise buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering Institute., IABSE 1992; 2:178-179.
2. Niwa N et al. Passive seismic response controlled structure with high damping device. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynmics 1995; 5:655-671.
3. Kurata N et al. An experimental study on framed structure with high damping system - shaking tablet test of a three-story steel model. Journal of Structural Engineering Japan, 1992; 38B:235-243.
4. Matsunaga Y et al. High damping device (HiDAM) for response control of large structures. Proceedings Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference ASME: Denver, CO, 1993; 69-76.
5. Hanson RD. Supplemental damping for improved seismic performance. Earthquake Spectra, EERI 1993; 9: 319-334.
6. School R. Fundamental design issues for supplemental damping applications. Earthquake Spectra, EERI 1993; 9: 627-636.
7. Miyazaki M, Mitsusaka Y. Design of a building with 20% or greater damping. Proceedings 10th World Conference Earthquake Engng., Madrid, Spain, 1992; 4143-4148.
8. Mahmoodi P et al. Performance of viscoelastic dampers in World trade center towers. Proceedings 5th Structural Congress. ASCE: Orlando, FL, 1987:632-644.
9. Hatada T et al. Study on dynamic analysis of structures with Maxwell model. Proceedings 9th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, 1994; 1843-1848.
10. Foss KA. Coordinates which uncouple the equations of motion of damped linear dynamic systems. Journal of Applied Mechanics ASME 1958; 32: 361-364.
11. Chen Q, Zhu D. Vibration analysis theory and application to elastic-viscoelastic composite structures. Computational Structures 1990; 37: 585-595.
12. Malone DW, Connor JJ. Transient dynamic response of linearly viscoelastic structures and continua. Proceedings Structural Dynamics Aeroelasticity Specialist Conference. AIAA: New Orleans, LA, 1969; 349-356.
13. Kitagawa Y, Nagataki Y, Kashima T. Dynamic response analysis with effects of strain rate and stress relaxation. Transaction of Architecture Institute Japan 1984; 343:32-41.
14. Fujimoto M, Wada A, Kimura Y. Dynamic response analysis of reinforced concrete frame using a three-element-Maxwell model. Journal of Structure and Construction Engineering Japan, 1989; 399:9-17.
15. Partom Y, Schanin I. Modeling nonlinear viscoelastic response. Polymer Engineering Science 1983; 23:849-859.
16. Amejima S, Fujii T, Nishida H. A simple numerical method for dynamic analysis of adhesive bonded sandwich beams. Report Science Engineering, Doshisha Univ. Japan, 1987; 27:21-37.
17. Carol J, Murcia J. A model for the non-linear time-dependent behaviour of concrete on compression based on a Maxwell chain with exponential algorithm. Materials and Structures 1989; 22:176-184.
18. Tuah H. Leonard JW. Dynamic response of viscoelastic cable elements. Ocean Engineering 1990; 17: 23-34.
19. Argyris J, Doltsinis I St. da Silva VD. Constitutive modelling and computation of non-linear viscoelastic solids. part-I: Rheological models and numerical integration techniques. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering 1991; 88: 135-163.
20. Yamada Y. Constitutive modelling of inelastic behavior and numerical solution of nonlinear problems by the finite element method. Computational Structure 1978; 8: 533-543.
21. Williams ML. Structural analysis of viscoelastic materials. J. AIAA 1964; 2:785-808.
22. Kolsky H. The role of experimental in the development of solid mechanics - some examples. Advanced Applied Mechanics, 1976; 16:309-368.
23. Sawano T, Kida T, Sudo M. Shear vibration response in a layer of viscoelastic body composed of non-linear spring and Maxwell model. Report Research Institute Industrial Tech., Nihon Univ 30, Japan, 1989.
24. Fung YC. Foundations of solid mechanics, Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1965.
25. Newmark NM. A method of computational for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 1959; 85:67-94.
26. Belytschko T, Hughes TJR. (eds) Computational Methods for Transient Analysis. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1983.
27. Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Tailor RL. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics 1977; 5:283-292.
28. Hilbert HM, Hughes TJR, Collocation, dissipation and 'overshoot' for time integration schemes in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1978; 6:99-117.