H∞-based control strategies for civil engineering structures

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 223-237

  Yang, J N ^a   Lin, S ^a   Jabbari, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmark problems; Dynamic output feedback; H based control; Linear matrix inequality; Multi objective control

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL THEORY; EARTHQUAKES; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; MATRIX ALGEBRA; VECTORS;

BENCHMARK PROBLEMS; DYNAMIC OUTPUT FEEDBACK; H∞-BASED CONTROL; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITY (LMI); MULTI-OBJECTIVE CONTROL;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 13244284679     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.38     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Casciati F (ed.). Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Structural Control, Wiley: New York, 2002.
2. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer BF, Dyke SJ. Summary of benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Proceedings of the 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference. Texas, 2000, CD-ROM, 8p, http:// www.nd.edu/~quake/bench.html; Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2003.
3. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer BF, Dyke SJ. Summary of benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Proceedings of the 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference. Texas, 2000, CD-ROM, 8p, http:// www.nd.edu/̃quake/bench.html; Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2003.
4. Yang JN, Agrawal AK, Samali B, Wu JC. A benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings. Proceedings of the 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference Texas, 2000, CD-ROM, 8p, http://www-ce. engr.ccny.cuny.edu/people/faculty/agrawal/benchmark.html; Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004.
5. Yang JN, Agrawal AK, Samali B, Wu JC. A benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings. Proceedings of the 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference Texas, 2000, CD-ROM, 8p, http://www-ce. engr.ccny.cuny.edu/people/faculty/agrawal/benchmark.html; Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004.
6. Dyke SJ, Caicedo JM, Turan G, Bergman LA. Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cablestayed bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering: Special Issue on Semi-active Control, ACSE; 129(7):857-872.
7. ∞ constraints. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 1992; 114:329-338.
8. Yang JN, Lin S, Jabbari F. Linear multi-objective control strategies for wind-excited buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004.
9. 2-based control strategies for civil engineering structegies. Journal of Structural Control 2003; 10:205-230.
10. Johnson EA, Voulgaris PG, Bergman LA. Multiobjective optimal structural control of the Notre Dame Building model benchmark. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:1165-1187.
11. Boyd S, El Ghaoui L, Feron E. Balakrishnan V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. Philadelphia: SIAM Books, 1994.
12. ∞ with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach (linear matrix inequalities). IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1996; 41(3):358-368.
13. Wu JC, Yang JN. Active control of transmission tower under stochastic wind. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998; 124(11):1302-1312.
14. Wu JC, Yang JN. LQG control of lateral-torsional motion of Nanjing TV transmission tower. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:1111-1130.
15. Lin S. Multi-Objective Control for Civil Engineering Structures. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Irvine, 2003.