Uncertainty in environmental risk assessment: Implications for risk-based management of river basins

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-37

  Ragas, Ad M J ^a   Huijbregts, Mark A J ^a   Henning De Jong, Irmgard ^a   Leuven, Rob Sew ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Environmental quality standards; Risk assessment; River management; Uncertainty; Variability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK MANAGEMENT; RIVER; UNCERTAINTY; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK MANAGEMENT; RIVERS; UNCERTAINTY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 66149099342     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-046.1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS. 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:1-18.
2. Bogen KT, Spear RC. 1987. Integrating uncertainty and interindividual variability in environmental risk assessment. Risk Anal 7:427-436.
3. [CEC] Commission of the European Communities. 2006. Directive of the European parliament and of the council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC. Brussels (BE): CEC. COM(2006) 397 final, 2006/0129 (COD).
4. Cowan CE, Versteeg DJ, Larson RJ, Kloeppersams PJ. 1995. Integrated approach for environmental assessment of new and existing substances. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 21:3-31.
5. Dorne JLCM, Skinner L, Frampton G, Spurgeon D, Ragas AMJ. 2007. Human and environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals: differences, similarities, lessons from toxicology. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1259-1268.
6. Dorne JLCM, Walton K, Renwick AG. 2005. Human variability in xenobiotic metabolism and pathway-related uncertainty factors for chemical risk assessment: a review. Food Chem Toxicol 43:203-216.
7. [EC] European Commission. 2003. Technical guidance document on risk assessment. Luxemburg (LU): Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
8. Evans JS, Gray GM, Sielken RLJ, Smith AE, Valdez FC, Graham JD. 1994. Use of probabilistic expert judgment in uncertainty analysis of carcinogenic potency. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 20:15-36.
9. Forbes TL, Forbes VE. 1993. A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology. Funct Ecol 7:249-254.
10. Frey HC. 1992. Quantitative analysis of uncertainty and variability in environmental policy making. Pittsburgh (PA): Research Associate Center for Energy and Environmental Studies.
11. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. 1990. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht (NL): Kluwer Academic.
12. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. 1994. The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecol Econ 10:197-208.
13. Hammersley JM, Handscomb DC. 1964. Monte Carlo methods. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons.
14. Hellström T. 1996. The science-policy dialogue in transformation: Modeluncertainty and environmental policy. Science and Public Policy 23:91-97.
15. Henning-De Jong I, Ragas AMJ, Hendriks HWM. 2008. Report on the impact of an additional ecotoxicity test when deriving environmental quality standards. Nijmegen (NL): Radboud University. NoMiracle Deliverable 4.1.8.
16. Hollander A. 2008. Spatial variation in multimedia mass balance models: The relative influence of environmental characteristics on the spatial variation in predicted environmental concentrations of chemicals [PhD Thesis]. Nijmegen (NL): Radboud Univ.
17. Huijbregts MAJ, Geelen LMG, Hertwich EG, McKone TE, Van de Meent D. 2005. A comparison between the multimedia fate and exposure models CalTOX and uniform system for evaluation of substances adapted for life-cycle assessment based on the population intake fraction of toxic pollutants. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:486-493.
18. Huijbregts MAJ, Gilijamse W, Ragas AMJ, Reijnders L. 2003. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment: A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environ Sci Technol 37:2600-2608.
19. Kaiser J. 2000. Dioxin draft sparks controversy. Science 288:1313-1314.
20. Kelly EJ, Campbell K. 2000. Separating variability and uncertainty in environmental risk assessment-Making choices. Human Ecol Risk Assess 6:1-13.
21. Lepper P. 2005. Manual on the methodological framework to derive environmental quality standards for priority substances in accordance with Article 16 of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Schmallenberg (DE): Fraunhofer-Institute.
22. Leuven RSEW, Poudevigne I. 2002. Riverine landscape dynamics and ecological risk assessment. Freshwater Biol 47:845-865.
23. Maltby L, Blake N, Brock TCM, Van den Brink PJ. 2005. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:379-388.
24. McKone TE, Ryan PB. 1989. Human exposures to chemicals through food chains: An uncertainty analysis. Environ Sci Technol 23:1154-1163.
25. Morgan MG, Henrion M. 1990. Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
26. Newig J, Pahl-Wostl C, Sigel K. 2005. The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Eur Env 15:333-343.
27. [NRC] National Research Council. 1975. Reactor safety: An assessment of accident risks in the U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NUREG-75-014 (WASH-1400).
28. [NRC] National Research Council. 1994. Science and judgment in risk assessment. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
29. Pahl-Wostl C. 2005. Information, public empowerment and the management of urban watersheds. Environ Model Assess 20:457-467.
30. Pellizzoni L. 2003. Uncertainty and participatory democracy. Environmental Values 12:195-224.
31. Ragas AMJ. 1999. The consequences of applying different mixing models, input data, and EQOs when deriving emission limits for discharge permits. European Water Management 2:62-71.
32. Ragas AMJ. 2000. Uncertainty in environmental quality standards [PhD thesis]. Nijmegen (NL): Radboud Univ.
33. Ragas AMJ, Boomsma D, Huijbregts MAJ. 2005. Quantifying the benefits of an extra ecotoxicity test to derive PNECs. In: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) 15th Annual Meeting; 22-26 May 2005, SETAC Europe, Brussels. Lille (FR): SETAC.
34. Ragas AMJ, Brouwer FPE, Büchner FL, Hendriks HWM, Huijbregts MAJ. 2008. Separation of uncertainty and interindividual variability in human exposure modeling. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (in press).
35. Ragas AMJ, Etienne RS, Willemsen FH, Van de Meent D. 1999. Assessing model uncertainty for environmental decision making: A case study of the coherence of independently derived environmental quality objectives for air and water. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1856-1867.
36. Ragas AMJ, Huijbregts MAJ. 1999. Evaluating the coherence between environmental quality objectives and the acceptable or tolerable daily intake. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 27:251-264.
37. Renn O. 1998. The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59:49-62.
38. Schroer AFW, Belgers JDM, Brock TCM, Matser AM, Maund SJ, Van den Brink PJ. 2004. Comparison of laboratory single species and field population-level effects of the pyrethroid insecticide k-cyhalothrin on freshwater vertebrates. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26:324-335.
39. Slob W. 1994. Uncertainty analysis in multiplicative models. Risk Analysis 14:571-576.
40. Slovic P. 2001. The risk game. J Hazard Mater 86:17-24.
41. Staatscourant 2000. Circulaire Streef-en interventiewaarden bodemsanering. Den Haag (NL): SDU. Staatscourant 2000:39 (in Dutch).
42. Thiessen KM, Hoffman FO, Rantavaara A, Hossain S. 1997. Environmental models undergo international test: The science and art of exposure assessment modeling were tested using real-world data from the Chernobyl accident. Environ Sci Technol 31:358-363.
43. Thomsen M, Sorensen PB, Fauser P, Faber J, Van der Pol J, Peirano F, Vernai AM, Strebel K, Schlink U, Espinosa Porragas G, Giralti Prat F, Rallo R, Pistocchi A. 2006. Pre-selection of scenario for cumulative risk assessment-Documentation of the first version of selection procedure including initial uncertainty evaluation. Silkeborg (DK): National Environmental Research Institute. NoMiracle Deliverable 1.2.4.
44. [USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington DC: Risk Assessment Forum. Federal Register 63:26846-26924.
45. [USPCCRARM] U.S. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. 1997. Framework for environmental health risk management. Washington DC: USPCCRARM.
46. Van Asselt MBA, Rotmans J, Rothman DS, eds. 2005. Scenario innovation: Experiences from a European experimental garden. London (UK): Taylor and Francis.
47. Van den Brink PJ, Blake N, Brock TCM, Maltby L. 2006. Predictive value of species sensitivity distributions for effects of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems. Human Ecol Risk Assess 12:645-764.
48. Van den Brink PJ, Brock TCM, Posthuma L. 2002. The value of the species sensitivity distribution concept for predicting field effects: (Non-)confirmation of the concept using semifield experiments. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW II, Traas TP, editors. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis. p 155-193.
49. Van der Heijden K. 1996. Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichester (UK): Wiley.
50. Van der Sluijs JP, Craye M, Funtowicz S, Kloprogge P, Ravetz J, Risbey J. 2005. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in modelbased environmental assessment: The NUSAP System. Risk Analysis 25:481-492.
51. Van Leeuwen CJ, Hermens JLM. 1995. Risk assessment of chemicals: An introduction. Dordrecht (NL): Kluwer Academic. 374 p.
52. Vercelli A. 1995. From soft uncertainty to hard environmental uncertainty. Economie Appliquée 48:251-270.
53. Webster M, Forest C, Reilly J, Babiker M, Kicklighter D, Mayers M, Prinn R, Sarofim M, Sokolov A, Stone P, Wang C. 2003. Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response. Climatic Change 61:295-320.
54. Wynne B. 1992. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1:281-304.
55. Yearley S, Cinderby S, Forrester J, Bailey P, Rosen P. 2003. Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study. Environmental Values 12:247-262.