Information, public empowerment, and the management of urban watersheds

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 20, Issue 4 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 457-467

  Pahl Wostl, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Agent based modeling; Citizen information tools; Empowerment; Integrated design of human technology environment systems; Integrated management; Technological change

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; URBAN PLANNING;

INTELLIGENT DESIGN; PUBLIC EMPOWERMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; URBAN WATERSHEDS;

WATERSHEDS;

INFRASTRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

EID: 9644281921     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barreteau O., Bousquet F., Attonaty J.-M. Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. J. Artif. Soc. Social Simulation. 4:2001;. [online] URL: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/5.html
2. Beck M.B., Cummings R.G. Wastewater infrastructure: challenges for the sustainable city in the new millennium. Habitat Int. 20:1996;405-420
3. Blum U.P. Die Sicherstellung der Wasserversorgung. Gas-Wasser-Abwasser. 10a/1995:1995;903-910
4. Burkhard R., Deletic A., Craig A. Techniques for water and wastewater management: a review of techniques and their integration in planning. Urban Wat. 2:2000;197-221
5. Burkhardt-Holm P., Studer C. Hormonaktive Substanzen im Abwasser. Sind Fische und andere wasserlebende Tiere gefährdet? Gas-Wasser-Abwasser. 7/2000:2000;504-509
6. Checkland P. System Thinking. System Practice. 1993;Wiley, Chichester. 350 pp.
7. Cichorowski G. Rationelle Wasserverwendung. Wasserkultur. 7/1996:1996;40-46
8. Cowie G.M., Borrett S.R. Institutional perspectives on participation and information in water management. Environ. Model. Software. 2004;. [this issue]
9. De Geus A. Modelling to predict or to learn? Eur. J. Operational Res. 59:1992;1-5
10. Dürrenberger, G., Behringer, J., Dahinden, U., Gerger, A., Kasemir, B., Querol, C., Schüle, R., Tabara, R., Toth, F., van Asselt, M., Vassilarou, D., Willi, N., Jaeger, C.C., 1997. Focus Groups in Integrated Assessment: A Manual for a Participatory Tool, ULYSSES Working Paper WP-97-2, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, Darmstadt University of Technology.
11. Fath B.D., Beck M.B. Elucidating public perceptions of environmental behavior: a case study of Lake Lanier. Environ. Model. Software. 2004;. [this issue]
12. Ferber J. Multi-Agent Systems. An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. 1999;Addison-Wesley, London
13. Fischer F. Technological deliberation in a democratic society: the case for participatory inquiry. Sci. Public Policy. 26:1999;294-302
14. Fishkin J.J. The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy. 1995;Yale university Press, New Haven and London
15. Glicken J. Getting stakeholder participation 'right': a discussion of participatory process and possible pitfalls. Environ. Sci. Policy. 3:2000;305-310
16. Jaeger C.C., Schüle R., Kasemir B. Focus groups in integrated assessment: a mirco-cosmos for reflexive modernization. Innovation. 12:1999;195-219
17. Johnson J. The "can you trust it?". Problem of simulation science in the design of socio-technical systems. Complexity. 6:2000;34-40
18. Jones T. Recent developments in the pricing of water services in OECD countries. Wat. Policy. 1:1998;637-651
19. Joss S., Brownlea A. Considering the concept of procedural justice for public policy - and decision-making in science and technology. Sci. Public Policy. 26:1999;321-330
20. Kaufmann-Hayoz R., Häuselmann Ch., Gessner W. 'Eco-Design' - die wahrnehmungspsychologische Erweiterung eines technischen Konzepts. Lesch W. Naturbilder. Ökologische Kommunikation zwischen Ästhetik und Moral. Themenhefte zum Schwerpunktprogramm Umwelt. 1996;71-93 Birkhäuser, S., Basel
21. Larsen T., Gujer W. Separate management of anthropogenic nutrient solutions (human urine). Water Sci. Technol. 34:1996;87-94
22. Larsen T., Gujer W. The concept of sustainable urban water management. Wat. Sci. Technol. 35:1997;3-10
23. Larsen T., Peters I., Alder A., Eggen R., Maurer M., Muncke J. Re-engineering the toilet for sustainable wastewater management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35:2001;192A-197A
24. Larsen, T., Rauch, W., Gujer, W., 2001b. Waste design paves the way for sustainable urban wastewater management. Proc. International Unesco Symposium 'Frontiers in Urban Water Management: Deadlock or Hope?', pp. 219-229. UNESCO, Paris, 2001.
25. Mitsch W., Jørgensen S.E. Ecological Engineering. 1989;Wiley, New York
26. Nooteboom B., Six F. The Trust Process in Organizations. 2003;Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
27. Pahl-Wostl C. The Dynamic Nature of Ecosystems: Chaos and Order Entwined. 1995;Wiley, Chichester
28. Pahl-Wostl C. Participative and Stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modeling processes. Integr. Assess. 3:2002;3-14
29. Pahl-Wostl C. Towards sustainability in the water sector: the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat. Sci. 64:2002;394-411
30. Pahl-Wostl C., Schlumpf C., Schönborn A., Büssenschütt M., Burse J. Models at the interface between science and society: impacts and options. Integr. Assess. 1:2000;267-280
31. Pahl-Wostl C., Schönborn A., Willi N., Muncke J., Larsen T.A. Investigating consumer attitudes towards the new technology of urine separation. Wat. Sci. Technol. 48:2003;57-65
32. Roy B. Using agents to make and manage markets across a supply web. Replacing central, global optimization with a distributed, self-organized market approach. Complexity. 3:1998;31-35
33. 2-calculator: a modelling tool for participatory integrated assessment methods. Environ. Model. Assess. 4:1999;1-12
34. Schlumpf C., Pahl-Wostl C., Schönborn A., Jaeger C.C., Imboden D.M. IMPACTS: an information tool for citizens to assess impacts of climate change from a regional perspective. Climate Change. 51:2001;199-241
35. Tillman D. Stakeholder Analysis in Water Supply Systems. 2001;PhD-thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich
36. Tillman D., Larsen T.A., Pahl-Wostl C., Gujer W. Modeling the actors in water supply systems. Wat. Sci. Technol. 39:(4):1999;203-211
37. Tillman D., Larsen T.A., Pahl-Wostl C., Gujer W. Interaction analysis of the actors in water supply systems. Wat. Sci. Technol. 41:2001;203-211
38. Tillman, D., Larsen, T.A., Pahl-Wostl, C., Gujer, W. Simulation for strategy development in water supply systems. Hydroinformatics (in press)
39. Wenger E. Communities of Practice; Learning, Meaning, and Identity. 1998;University Press, Cambridge