Chapter 21 ACE Models of Endogenous Interactions

Handbook of Computational Economics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1047-1079

  Vriend, Nicolaas J ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agent based Computational Economics (ACE); endogenous interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 66049145615     PISSN: 15740021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02021-6     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Arthur W.B. Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 84 (1994) 406-411
2. Ashlock D., Smucker M.D., Stanley E.A., and Tesfatsion L. Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of prisoner's dilemma. BioSystems 37 (1996) 99-125
3. Blin J.M. Comments on "The Economics of Markets: a Simple Model of the Market-making Process". Journal of Business 53 3, Pt. 2 (1980) S193-S197
4. Brenner, T. (2006). "Agent learning representation: advice on modelling economic learning", this handbook
5. Chang M.-H., and Harrington Jr. J.E. Discovery and diffusion of knowledge in an endogenous social network. American Journal of Sociology 110 (2005) 937-976
6. Dieckmann T. The evolution of conventions with mobile players. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38 (1999) 93-111
7. Duffy, J. (2006). "Agent-based models and human subject experiments", this handbook
8. Epstein J.M., and Axtell R. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up (1996), Brookings/MIT Press, Washington, DC
9. Galouye D.F. Counterfeit World (1964), Victor Gollancz, London
10. Hanaki, N., Peterhansl, A., Dodds, P.S., Watts, D.J. (2004). "Cooperation in evolving social networks" (mimeo)
11. Jackson, M.O., Rogers, B.W. (2004). "Search and the strategic formation of large networks: when and why do we see power laws and small worlds?" (mimeo)
12. Judd, K. (2006). "Computationally intensive analyses in economics", this handbook
13. Kirman A.P., and Vriend N.J. Evolving market structure: an ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 3/4 (2001) 459-502
14. Klamer A. The New Classical Macroeconomics. Conversations with New Classical Economists and their Opponents (1984), Wheatsheaf, Brighton
15. Mailath G.J., Samuelson L., and Shaked A. Evolution and Endogenous Interactions. In: Pagano U., and Nicita A. (Eds). The Evolution of Economic Diversity (2000), Routledge, Siena
16. Oechssler J. Decentralization and the coordination problem. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 32 (1997) 119-135
17. Pancs, R., Vriend, N.J. (2003). "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited" (Dept. of Economics Working Paper No. 487), Queen Mary, University of London
18. Riolo R.L. The effects and evolution of tag-mediated selection of partners in populations playing the iterated prisoner's dilemma. In: Bäck Th. (Ed). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (1997), Morgan Kaufmann 378-385
19. Sakoda, J.M. (1949). "Minidoka: an analysis of changing patterns of social interaction", unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
20. Sakoda J.M. The checkerboard model of social interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1 (1971) 119-132
21. Schelling T.C. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1 2 (1971) 143-186
22. Skyrms B., and Pemantle R. A dynamic model of social network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97 16 (2000) 9340-9346
23. Tesfatsion, L. (2006). "Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory", this handbook
24. Varian H.R. Microeconomic Analysis. 2nd edn (1984), Norton, New York
25. Vriend N.J. Self-organization of markets: an example of a computational approach. Computational Economics 8 3 (1995) 205-231
26. Wilhite, A. (2006). "Economic activity on fixed networks", this handbook