Combined haplotype relative risk (CHRR): A general and simple Genetic association test that combines trios and unrelatedcase-controls

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 54-62

  Guo, Chao Yu ^a,b   Lunetta, Kathryn L ^c   DeStefano, Anita L ^c   Cupples, L Adrienne ^c  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Case control association study; HRR; Missing data; TDT; Trios

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; FAMILY STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PROGENY; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EPIDEMIOLOGY, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 65849415868     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20356     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen AS, Rathouz PJ, Satten GA. 2003. Informative missingness in genetic association studies: case-parent designs. Am J Hum Genet 72:671-680.
2. Breslow NE, Day NE. 1994. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies. USA: Oxford University Press.
3. Chen YH. 2004. New approach to association testing in case-parent designs under informative parental missingness. Genet Epidemiol 27:131-140.
4. Clayton D. 1999. A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test for uncertain haplotype transmission. Am J Hum Genet 65:1170-1177.
5. Curtis DR, Sham PC. 1995. A note on the application of the transmission disequilibrium test when a parent is missing. Am J Hum Genet 56:811-812.
6. Devlin B, Roeder K. 1999. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55:997-1004.
7. Epstein MP, Veal CD, Trembath RC, Barker JN, Li C, Satten GA. 2005. Genetic association analysis using data from trios and unrelated subjects. Am J Hum Genet 76:592-608.
8. Epstein MP, Allen AS, Satten GA. 2007. A simple and improved correction for population stratification in case-control studies. Am J Hum Genet 80:921-930.
9. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS. 1995. The transmission/disequilibrium test: history, subdivision and admixture. Am J Hum Genet 57: 455-464.
10. Falk CT, Rubinstein P. 1987. Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 51:227-233.
11. Guo CY, Cui J, Cupples LA. 2005a. Impact of non-ignorable missingness on genetic tests of linkage and/or association using case-parents trios. BMC Genet 6:S90.
12. Guo CY, Destefano AL, Lunetta KL, Dupuis J, Cupples LA. 2005b. Expectation maximization algorithm based haplotype relative risk (EM-HRR): test of linkage disequilibrium using incomplete caseparents trios. Hum Hered 59:125-135.
13. Knapp M, Seuchter SA, Baur MP. 1993. The haplotype-relative-risk (HRR) method for analysis of association in nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 52:1085-1093.
14. Martin ER, Kaplan NL. 2000. A Monte Carlo procedure for two-stage tests with correlated data. Genet Epidemiol 18:48-62.
15. Nagelkerke NJ, Hoebee B, Teunis P, Kimman TG. 2004. Combining the transmission disequilibrium test and case-control methodology using generalized logistic regression. Eur J Hum Genet 12: 964-970.
16. Ott J. 1989. Statistical properties of the haplotype relative risk. Genet Epidemiol 6:127-130.
17. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. 2006. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38:904-909.
18. Pritchard JK, Rosenberg NA. 1999. Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. Am J Hum Genet 65:220-228.
19. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA, Donnelly P. 2000. Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 67: 170-181.
20. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, Sham PC 2007. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 81:559-575.
21. Rubinstein P, Walker M, Krassner J, Carrier C, Carpenter C, Dobersen MJ, Notkins AL, Mark EM, Nechemias C, Hausknecht RU, Ginsberg-Fellner F. 1981. HLA antigens and islet cell antibodies in gestational diabetes. 3:271-275.
22. Sebastiani P, Abad MM, Alpargu G, Ramoni MF. 2004. Robust transmission/ disequilibrium test for incomplete family genotypes. Genetics 168:2329-2337.
23. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1969. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, p 612.
24. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. 1993. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the sinsulin gene region and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Hum Genet 52:506-516.
25. Terwilliger JD, Ott J. 1992. A haplo-type-based 'haplo-type relative risk' approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 42:337=346.
26. Thomson G. 1995. Mapping disease genes: family-based association studies. Am J Hum Genet 57:487-498.
27. Veal CD, Capon F, Allen MH, Heath EK, Evans JC, Jones A, Patel S, Burden D, Tillman D, Barker JNWN et al. 2002. Family-based analysis using a dense single-nucleotide polymorphism-based map defines genetic variation at PSORS1, the major psoriasis-susceptibility locus. Am J Hum Genet 71: 554-564.
28. Weinberg CR. 1999. Allowing for missing parents in genetic studies of case-parents triads. Am J Hum Genet 64:1186-1193.