A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening

European Journal of Cancer

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1554-1559

  van Gils, Paul ^a   van den Berg, Matthijs ^a   van Kranen, Henk ^a   de Wit, Ardine G ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adherence; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Cost effectiveness; CT Colonography; Screening; Sensitivity; Test characteristics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 65849172834     PISSN: 09598049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.032     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ferlay J., Autier P., Boniol M., Heanue M., Colombet M., and Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 18 3 (2007) 581-592
2. Anderson W.F., Guyton K.Z., Hiatt R.A., Vernon S.W., Levin B., and Hawk E. Colorectal cancer screening for persons at average risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 94 15 (2002) 1126-1133
3. Markowitz S.D., Dawson D.M., Willis J., and Willson J.K. Focus on colon cancer. Cancer Cell 1 3 (2002) 233-236
4. Gollub M.J., Schwartz L.H., and Akhurst T. Update on colorectal cancer imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 45 1 (2007) 85-118
5. Ballinger A.B., and Anggiansah C. Colorectal cancer. Bmj 335 7622 (2007) 715-718
6. O'Connell J.B., Maggard M.A., and Ko C.Y. Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 19 (2004) 1420-1425
7. Winawer S.J., Flehinger B.J., Schottenfeld D., and Miller D.G. Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 85 16 (1993) 1311-1318
8. Hafner M. Conventional colonoscopy: technique, indications, limits. Eur J Radiol 61 3 (2007) 409-414
9. Recommendations on cancer screening in the European union. Advisory committee on cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer 36 12 (2000) 1473-1478
10. von Karsa L, Antilla A, Ronco G, et al. Cancer Screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening. First Report. Luxembourg; 2008.
11. Bakkenist T, van den Berg M. Bevolkingsonderzoek naar dikkedarmkanker. Stand van zaken juni 2008: projecten, expert meeting, literatuurstudie. Bilthoven, Den Haag: RIVM, ZonMw; 2008.
12. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(1):CD001216.
13. Burch J.A., Soares-Weiser K., St-John D.J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests used in screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Med Screening 14 3 (2007) 132-137
14. van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J., Bossuyt P.M., van Deventer S.J., and Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 2 (2006) 343-350
15. Briggs A., Sculpher M., and Claxton K. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. CBS. Consumentenprijsindices (CPI) alle huishoudens, 2000=100 In: Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek; 2007.
17. OECD. Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) for OECD Countries since 1980. In: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2007.
18. Heitman S.J., Manns B.J., Hilsden R.J., Fong A., Dean S., and Romagnuolo J. Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Cmaj 173 8 (2005) 877-881
19. Hassan C., Zullo A., Laghi A., et al. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 39 3 (2007) 242-250
20. Khandker R.K., Dulski J.D., Kilpatrick J.B., Ellis R.P., Mitchell J.B., and Baine W.B. A decision model and cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance guidelines for average-risk adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16 3 (2000) 799-810
21. Sonnenberg A., Delco F., and Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?. Am J Gastroenterol 94 8 (1999) 2268-2274
22. Sonnenberg A., Delco F., and Inadomi J.M. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 133 8 (2000) 573-584
23. Sonnenberg A., and Delco F. Cost-effectiveness of a single colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 162 2 (2002) 163-168
24. Ladabaum U., Song K., and Fendrick A.M. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 7 (2004) 554-563
25. Vijan S., Hwang E.W., Hofer T.P., and Hayward R.A. Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance. Am J Med 111 8 (2001) 593-601
26. Vijan S., Hwang I., Inadomi J., et al. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal Neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 102 2 (2007) 380-390
27. Pickhardt P.J., Hassan C., Laghi A., Zullo A., Kim D.H., and Morini S. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions. Cancer (2007)
28. Ness R.M., Holmes A.M., Klein R., and Dittus R. Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages. Am J Gastroenterol 95 7 (2000) 1800-1811
29. Frazier A.L., Colditz G.A., Fuchs C.S., and Kuntz K.M. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. Jama 284 15 (2000) 1954-1961
30. Mulhall B.P., Veerappan G.R., and Jackson J.L. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142 8 (2005) 635-650
31. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I., van Ballegooijen M., Zauber A.G., Boer R., Wilschut J., and Habbema J.D. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach. Int J Cancer (2008)
32. Scott R.G., Edwards J.T., Fritschi L., Foster N.M., Mendelson R.M., and Forbes G.M. Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Am J Gastroenterol 99 6 (2004) 1145-1151
33. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice. Med J Aust 184 11 (2006) 546-550
34. Segnan N., Senore C., Andreoni B., et al. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 132 7 (2007) 2304-2312
35. Coebergh J.W. Colorectal cancer screening in Europe: first things first. Eur J Cancer 40 5 (2004) 638-642
36. Froehlich F., Harris J.K., Wietlisbach V., Burnand B., Vader J.P., and Gonvers J.J. Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE). Endoscopy 38 5 (2006) 461-469
37. Jonas D.E., Russell L.B., Sandler R.S., Chou J., and Pignone M. Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study. Med Decis Making 28 1 (2008) 56-65