To be or not to be: Community supervision Déjà Vu

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 209-219

  Taxman, Faye S ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evidence based practices; Intensive supervision; Organizational change; Rapport building

Indexed keywords

EID: 65749286573     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10509670802134036     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andrews, D. A. and Bonta, J. (2006) The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.), LexisNexis, Newark, NJ
2. Aos, S., Miller, M. and Drake, E. (2006) Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Future Prison Construction, Criminal Justice Costs, and Crime Rates
3. Bonta, J. and Andrews, D. A. (2007) Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and treatment, Public Safety Canada, Ottawa
4. Byrne, J. and Taxman, F. (2005) Crime (control) is a choice: Divergent perspectives on the role of treatment in the adult corrections system. Criminology and Public Policy, 4:2, pp. 290-309.
5. Cochrane, R. (1992) Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions, California: Sage Publications
6. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M. L., Cartier, J., Wexler, H. W. and Anglin, M. D. (1999) Barriers to implementing effective correctional treatment programs. The Prison Journal, 79, pp. 150-162.
7. Glaze, L. E. and Bonczar, T. P (2006) Probation and parole in the United States, 2005, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC
8. Harrell, A., Mitchell, O., Hirst, A., Marlowe, D. and Merrill, J. (2002) Breaking the cycle of drugs and crime: Findings from the Birmingham BTC demonstration. Criminology and Public Policy, 1:2, pp. 189-216.
9. Harrison, L. D. and Martin, S. S. (2001) Residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) for state prisoners: Compendium of initial and process, DOJ/OJP/NIJ, Washington, DC
10. Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Lee, P. A., Dugosh, K. L. and Benasutti, K. M. (2006) Matching judicial supervision to clients' risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 52, pp. 52-76.
11. Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Dugosh, K. L. and Lee, P. A. (2006) Are judicial status hearings a "key component" of drug court? Six and twelve months outcomes. Drug & Alcohol Dependence., 76, pp. 145-155.
12. Morris, N. and Tonry, M. (1990) Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
13. Petersilia, J. and Turner, S. (1993) Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole: Results of a nationwide experiment, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
14. (2007) Parole, desistance from crime, and community integration. committee on community supervision and desistance from crime, committee on law and justice, division of behavioral and social sciences and education, The National Academy Press, Washington, DC
15. (2005) Implementing evidence based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective interventions, National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC
16. Taxman, F. S. (2002) Supervision-Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66:2, pp. 14-27.
17. Taxman, F., Byrne, J. M. and Thanner, M. (2002) Evaluating the implementation & impact of a seamless system of care for substance abusing offenders: The HIDTA Model, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
18. Taxman, F. S., Sheperdson, E. and Byrne, J. M. (2004) Tools of the trade: A guide to incorporating science into practice, National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC
19. Taxman, F. S. and Bouffard, J. (2005) Explaining drug treatment completion in drug court courts. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42:1, pp. 23-50.
20. Walters, S. T., Clark, M. D., Gingerich, R. and Meltzer, M. L. (2007) Motivating offenders to change: A guide for probation and parole, National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC