Supervision - Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness

Federal Probation

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 14-27

  Taxman, Faye S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036762816     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams, S.,A. Welch & J. Bonds, 1958. "The specialized Intensive Parole Unit: Supplementary Report." No. 1. Sacramento, California: Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Research Section.
2. Andrews, D.A. & J. Bonta. 1996. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
3. Bureau of Justice Statistics-Special Report. 2001a. "Trends in State Parole, 1990-2000." NCJ 184735. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
4. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2001b. "U.S. Correctional Population, 1999." NCJ 183508. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
5. Byrne, J. 1990. "The Future of Intensive Supervision Probation." Crime and Delinquency 36:6-39.
6. Byrne, J.M. & A. Pattavina 1992. The Effectiveness Issue: Assessing What Works in the Adult Community Corrections System, pp. 281-303 in J. Byrne, A. Lurigio & J. Petersilia (eds.), Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions. Newbury, CA: Sage.
7. Byrne, J.M. & L.M. Kelly. (1989). Restructuring Probation as an Intermediate Sanction: An Evaluation of the Massachusetts Intensive Probation Supervision Program: Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. Lowell, MA: University of Lowell, Department of Criminal Justice.
8. Burkhart, W.R. 1969. "The Parole Work Unit Programme: An Evaluation Report." British Journal of Criminology, 9: 125-147.
9. California Department of Corrections, 1961. "Narcotics Treatment-Control Program. Progress Report-First Year's Program Experience, Oct 1, 1959-September 30, 1960." Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections, Adult Parole Division.
10. California Department of Corrections, 1960. "Narcotics Treatment-Control Project Directive." Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections, Adult Parole Division.
11. Clear, T.R. & V. O'Leary. 1983. "Controlling the Offender in the Community: Reforming the Community-Supervision Function.' Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.
12. Cochran, D. 1992. The Long Road From Policy Development to Real Change in Sanctioning Practice, pp. 281-303, in J. Byrne, A. Lurigio & J. Petersilia (eds.), Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions. Newbury, CA: Sage.
13. Dembo, R. 1972. "Orientation and Activities of the Parole Officer." Criminology 10(2) 193-215.
14. Duffee, D. 1975. Correctional Policy and Prison Organization. New York, NY: Sage.
15. Erwin, B. 1986. "Turning Up the Heat on Probationers in Georgia." Federal Probation. 50:17-29.
16. Etheridge, R.M., R.L. Hubbard, J. Anderson, S.G. Craddock & P.M. Flynn. 1997. "Treatment Structure and Program Services in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS)." Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11:244-260.
17. Eze, E. 1962. "Specialized Intensive Parole Unit, Phase III." Sacramento, California: Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Research Section.
18. Fallen, D.L., C.G. Apperson, J. Hall-Milligan & S. Aos. 1977. "Report: Intensive Parole Supervision." Washington, D.C.: Department of Social and Health Services.
19. Gottfredson, S.D., & D.M. Gottfredson. 1985. "Screening for Risk Assessment Parolees: Policy, Practice, and Method," in D.P. Farrington & R. Tarling (eds.) Prediction in Criminology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20. Gottfredson, M. & T. Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Harrell, A., O. Mitchell, A. Hirst, D. Marlowe & J. Merrill. 2002. "Breaking the Cycle of Drugs and Crime: Findings From the Birmingham BTC Demonstration." Criminology & Public Policy1(2): 189-215.
22. Havel, J., 1965. "Special Intensive Parole Unit Phase IV." Research Report No. 13. Sacramento, California: Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Research Section.
23. Havel, J. & E. Sulk, 1962. "Special Intensive Parole Unit Phase III." Research Report No. 3. Sacramento, California: Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Research Section.
24. Himelson, A.N. & B.C. Margulies. 1965. "Narcotics Treatment Control Program Phase III." Sacramento, California: Bureau of Criminal Statistics, Research Section.
25. Jolin, A. & B. Stipack. (1991). "Clackamas County Community Corrections Intensive Drug Program: Program Evaluation Report." Portland, OR: Portland State University, Department of Administration of Justice.
26. Katz, J. 1982. "The Activities and Decisions of Probation Officers." Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9: 455-475.
27. Latessa, E.J. 1993a. "An Evaluation of the Lucas County Adult Probation Department's IDU anal High Risk Groups." Unpublished manuscript. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
28. Latessa, E.J. 1993b. "Profile of the Special Units of the Lucas County Adult Probation Department." Unpublished manuscript. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
29. Latessa, E.J., L. Travis, B. Fulton & A. Stichman, 1998. Evaluating the Prototypical ISP: Final Report. Cincinnati, Ohio: University of Cincinnati and American Probation and Parole Assoc.
30. Lohman, J.D., A. Wahl, R.M. Carter & S.P. Lewis, 1967. "The Intensive Supervision Caseload: A Preliminary Evaluation: Research Report Number 11." Berkeley, California: University of California, School of Criminology.
31. MacKenzie, D.L. 2000. "Evidence-based Corrections: Identifying What Works." Crime and Delinquency, 46: 457-471.
32. MacKenzie, D.L. 1997. "Criminal Justice and Crime Prevention," pp. 447, in L.W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S. Bushway (eds.), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Washington, D.C.: Office of Justice Programs.
33. Martinson, R. 1974. "What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform." The Public Interest, 35: 22-54.
34. Mitchell, C.J. & C. Butter. 1986. "Intensive Supervision/Early Release Parole." Utah Department of Corrections.
35. Moon, M.M., & E.J. Latessa. 1993. "The Effectiveness of an Outpatient Drug Treatment Program on Felony Probationers." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Kansas City.
36. National Council on Crime and Delinquency. 1991. Evaluation of the Florida Community Control Program. San Francisco: Author.
37. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). 2000. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment. National Institutes of Health: Rockville, MD.
38. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, 1972. "A Study of Probation and Parole Supervision, 1969-1972." Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
39. O'Leary, V. & T. Clear. 1984. "Managing the Offender in the Community." Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Corrections.
40. Palmer, T. 1995. "Programmatic and Nonprogrammatic Aspects of Successful Intervention: New Directions for Research." Crime and Delinquency, 41(1): 100-131.
41. Pearson, F.S. 1987. "Research on New Jersey's intensive Supervision Program." Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
42. Petersilia, J. 1999. "A Decade with Experimenting with Intermediate Sanctions: What Have We Learned?" Perspectives, 23(1): 39-44.
43. Petersilia, J. 1998. "Parole and Prisoner Reentry in the United States," pp. 470-530, in M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (eds.), Crime and Justice, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
44. Petersilia, J. & S. Turner. 1993a. "Evaluating Intensive Supervision Probation/Parole: Results of a Nationwide Experiment." Research in Brief. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
45. Petersilia, J. & S. Turner. 1993b. "Intensive Probation and Parole." Crime and Justice, 17: 281-335.
46. Prochaska, J.O. & C.C. DiClemente. 1986. "Toward a Comprehensive Model of Change," in W.R. Miller & N. Heather (eds.), Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change. New York: Plenum Press.
47. Robison, J., L.T. Wilkins, R.M. Carter & G.A. Wahl, 1969. "A Review and New Findings: Offender Classification, Sentencing, Disposition, Supervision Intensity, Violation Rate." The San Francisco Project Research Report Number 14. Berkeley, California; University of California, School of Criminology.
48. Sachwald, J. 2001. Proactive Community Supervision: A Plan for Making Maryland Communities Safer. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Baltimore, MD.
49. Sampson, R.J. & J.H. Laub. 1993. "Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life." Cambridge, MA: Howard University Press.
50. Schearer, R.A. 2001. "Strategic Alignment in Community Supervision of Offenders." Perspectives. 18-21.
51. Sherman, L.W., D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S. Bushway. 1997. "Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising." Washington, D.C.
52. Silverman, K., S. Higgins, R. Brooner, C. Montoya, E. Cone, C. Schuster & K. Preston. 1996. "Sustained Cocaine Abstinence in Methadone Maintenance Patients Through Voucher-Based Reinforcement Therapy." Archives of General Psychiatry 53: 409-415.
53. Simpson, D.D. & K. Knight. 1999. "TCU Model of Treatment Process and Outcomes in Correctional Settings." U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
54. Simpson, D.D., H.K. Wexler & J.A. Inciardi. 1999. "Drug Treatment Outcomes for Correctional Settings, Part 1." The Prison Journal, 79(3): 291-293.
55. Sing, G.E. 1967. "The Relationship Between the Average Number of Supervising Agent-Narcotic Addict Outpatient Contacts and the Number of Successful Weeks in the California Narcotic Addict Outpatient Program." Corona, California: California Rehabilitation Center, Research Division.
56. Surgeon General. 2000. "Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General." Washington, D.C.
57. Taxman, F.S. 1999. "Unraveling "What Works" for Offenders in Substance Abuse Treatment Services." National Drug Court Institute Review, Vol. II (2): 93-134.
58. Taxman, F.S. 1998. "Reducing Recidivism Through A Seamless System of Care: Components of Effective Treatment, Supervision, and Transition Services in the Community." College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland, College Park.
59. Taxman, F.S., 1982. "Need and Risk Classification." Newark, N.J.: Rutgers University-School of Criminal Justice. Unpublished Dissertation.
60. Taxman, F.S., D. Young & J.M. Byrne. 2002. "Targeting for Reentry: Matching Needs and Services to Maximize Public Safety." Unpublished paper. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, College Park (under review).
61. Taxman, F.S. & J. Bouffard. 2000. "The Importance of Systems in Improving Offender Outcomes: Critical Elements of Treatment Integrity." Justice Research and Policy 2(2): 9-30.
62. Taxman, F.S., D. Soule & A. Gelb. 1999. "Graduated Sanctions: Stepping into Accountable Systems and Offenders," Prison Journal: 182-205.
63. Thanner, M.T. & F.S. Taxman 2001. "The Multiple Career Paths of Drug Offenders." Unpublished paper. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland, College Park (under review).
64. Van Voorhis, P., & Brown, R. 1997. Risk Classification in the 1990's. National Institute of Corrections. Washington, D.C.
65. Warr, M. 1998. "Life Course Transitions and Desistance from Crime." Criminology 36: 183-218.