Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario - Anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-08-02, Issue , 2008, Pages 116-123

  Syrdal, Dag Sverre ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a   Walters, Michael L ^a   Koay, Kheng Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS;

EID: 65649125963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Aiello, J. R.;DeRisi, D. T.;Epstein, Y. M.; & Karlin, R. A. 1977. Crowding and the Role of Interpersonal Distance Preference. Sociometry 40(3): 271-282.
2. Albas, C. 1991. Proxemic Behavior: A Study of Extrusion. Journal of Social Psychology 131(5): 697-702.
3. Albright, L.;Kenny, D. A.; & Malloy, T. E. 1988. Consensus in Personality Judgments at Zero Acquaintance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 55(3): 387-395.
4. Bartneck, C.Chioke, R.;Menges, R.; & Deckers, I. 2005. Robot Abuse - A Limitation of the Media Equation, Paper presented at the Interact 2005 Workshop on Abuse, Rome.
5. Burgoon, J. K.; & Walther, J. B. 1990. Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations. Human Communication Research 17(2): 232-265.
6. Cesta, A.;Cortellessa, G.;Giuliani, M. V.;Pecora, F.;Scopelliti, M.; & Tiberio, L. 2007. Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly. PsychNology Journal 5(3): 229-252.
7. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., and Hagman, J. 2003. Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 05 -10, 2003). CHI '03. ACM, New York, NY, 273-280.
8. Gillespie, D. L.; & Leffler, A. (1983). Theories of nonverbal behavior: A critical review of proxemics research. In Sociological Theory Vol 1. (pp. 120-154).
9. Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
10. Harmo, P.;Taipalus, T.;Knuuttila, J.;Vallet, J.; & Halme, A. 2005. Needs and Solutions - Home Automation and Service Robots for the Elderly and Disabled. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton Canada 2005.
11. Hartnett, J. J.; Bailey, K. G.; & Gibson, F. W. 1970. Personal space as influenced by sex and type of movement. Journal-of-Psychology:- Interdisciplinary-and-Applied. Vol. 76(2) Nov 1970, 139-144.
12. Hinds, P. J.;Roberts, T. L.; & Jones, H. 2004. Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task. Human-Computer Interaction 19(1): 151 - 181.
13. Hüttenrauch, H.; & Severinson Eklundh, K. 2002. Fetch-and-carry with CERO: Observations from a long-term user study with a service robot. Proceeding of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2001), Berlin, Germany Sept 25-27, 2002: 158-163.
14. Kendon, A. 1990. Conducting interaction - Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. Cambridge, NY, USA: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
15. Kiesler, S.; & Goetz, J. 2002. Mental Models and Cooperation with Robotic Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM CHI'02 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 576-577.
16. Koay, K. L.;Sisbot, E. A.;Syrdal, D. S.;Walters, M. L.;Dautenhahn, K.; & Alami, R. 2007. Exploratory Study of a Robot Approaching a Person in the Context of Handing Over an Object. AAAI2007 Spring Symposia - Technical Report SS-07-07, 26-28 March 2007: 18-24.
17. Koay, K. L.;Syrdal, D. S.;Walters, M. L.; & Dautenhahn, K. 2007. Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences during a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-man 2007), Jeju Island, Korea: 564-569.
18. Kovner, C. T.;Mezey, M.; & Harrington, C. 2002. Who Cares For Older Adults? Workforce Implications Of An Aging Society. Health Aff 21 (5): 78-89.
19. Krail, K. A.; & Leventhal, G. 1976. The Sex Variable in the Intrusion of Personal Space. Sociometry 39(2): 170-173.
20. Lee, S.; & Kiesler, S. 2005. Human mental models of humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA 05) (pp. 2767-2772), Barcelona, Spain.
21. Luczak, H.;Roetting, M.; & Schmidt, L. 2003. Let's talk: anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices. Ergonomics 46(13/14): 1361-1374.
22. Matthews, G.;Deary, I. J.; & Whiteman, M. C. 2003. Personality Traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Montemerlo, M.;Pineau, J.;Roy, N.;Thrun, S.; & Verma, V. 2002. Experience with a Mobile Robotic Guide for the Elderly. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, August, 2002.
24. Reeves, B.; & Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation: How people computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Roy, N.; Baltus, G.;Fox, D.;Gemperle, F.;Goetz, J.;Hirsch, T., et al. 2000. Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly. Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment (WIRE 2000).
26. Sabanovic, S.;Michalowski, M. P.; & Caporael, L. R. 2007. Making Friends:Building Social Robots Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics; Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium -Technical Report SS-07-07: 71-77.
27. Strube, M. J.; & Werner, C. 1984. Personal space claims as a function of interpersonal threat: The mediating role of need for control. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 8(3): 195.
28. Sung, J., Grinter, R. E., Christensen, H. I., and Guo, L. 2008. Housewives or technophiles?: understanding domestic robot owners. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international Conference on Human Robot interaction (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 12 - 15, 2008). HRI '08. ACM, New York, NY, 129-136.
29. Swann, J. 2006. Assistive equipment around the home: Tools for daily living. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 14(3), 135-138
30. Syrdal, D. S.;Dautenhahn, K.;Woods, S.;Walters, M. L.; & Koay, K. L. 2006. 'Doing the right thing wrong' - Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches. Proc. 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2006): 183-188.
31. Syrdal, D. S.;Koay, K.-L.;Walters, M. L.; & Dautenhahn, K. 2007. A personalised robot companion? The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(Ro-man), Jeju Island, Korea.
32. Syrdal, D.; Walters, M. L.;Koay, K. L.; & Dautenhahn, K. 2008. The role of autonomy and interaction type on spatial comfort in an HRI scenario. Proceedings of Robotic Helpers: User Interaction, Interfaces and Companions in Assistive and Therapy Robotics. Full-day workshop at the third ACM/IEEE Human-Robot Interaction Conference (HRI08), 12-15 March 2008, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
33. Tsui, K. M.; & Yanco, H. A. 2007. Assistive, Surgical, and Rehabilitation Robots from the Perspective of Medical and Healthcare Professionals. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction, July 2007.
34. United-Nations. (2002). World Population Ageing 1950-2050: United Nations, New York: United Nations Population Division.
35. Walters, M.;Syrdal, D. S.;Dautenhahn, K.;Boekhorst, R. T.;Koay, K. L.; & Woods, S. 2008. Avoiding the Uncanny Valley - Robot Appearance, Personality and Consistency of Behavior in an Attention-Seeking Home Scenario for a Robot Companion. Autonomous Robots 24(2): 159-178.
36. Walters, M. L.; Dautenhahn, K.;Boekhorst, R. T.;Koay, K. L.;Kaouri, C.;Woods, S., et al. 2005. The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. Proc., 14th IEEE International Workshop On Robot And Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2005): 347-352.
37. Walters, M. L.;Dautenhahn, K.;Koay, K. L.; Kaouri, C.;René te Boekhorst;Nehaniv, C., et al. 2005. Close Encounters: Spatial Distances between People and a Robot of Mechanistic Appearance. Proceedings of 2005 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Tsukuba, Japan: 450-455.
38. Williams, J. L. 1971. Personal space and its relation to extraversion-introversion. Canadian-Journal-of-Behavioural-Science 3(2): 156-160.
39. Woods, S. N.;Walters, M. L.;Koay, K. L.; & Dautenhahn, K. 2006. Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials. Proceedings, 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2006) (51-58): 51-58.
40. Zebrowitz, L. A.;Hall, J. A.;Murphy, N. A.; & Rhodes, G. 2002. Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 238-249.