A personalized robot companion? - The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios

Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1143-1148

  Syrdal, Dag Sverre ^a   Koay, Kheng Lee ^a   Walters, Michael L ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW INTERACTIONS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ROBOTICS;

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; PERSONALITY TRAITS; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; ROBOT COMPANION; VERBAL INTERACTIONS;

ROBOTS;

EID: 48749085170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415252     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. W. Gates, "A robot in every home," Scientific American, 2007.
2. J. Goetz and S. Kiesler, "Cooperation with a Robotic Assistant," CHI '02 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2002.
3. P. Wu and C. Miller, "Results from a field study: The need for an emotional relationship between the elderly and their assistive technologies," in Foundations of Augmented Cogniton, Vol 11. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Publ, 2005, pp. 889-898.
4. K. Dautenhahn, "Robots We Like to Live With? - A Developmental Perspective on a Personalized, Life-Long Robot Companion," Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2004), pp. 17-22., 2004.
5. K. Dautenhahn, B. Ogden, and T. Quick, "From Embodied to Socially Embedded Agents - Implications for Interaction-Aware Robots," Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 3, pp. 397-428, 2002.
6. E. T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
7. M. L. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, R. T. Boekhorst, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri, S. Woods, C. Nehaniv, D. Lee, and I. Werry, "The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment," Proc. 14th IEEE International Workshop On Robot And Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), pp. 347-352, 2005.
8. D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, S. Woods, M. L. Walters, and K. L. Koay, "'Doing the right thing wrong' - Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches," Proc. 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2006), pp. 183-188, 2006.
9. M. Walters, S. Woods, K. L. Koay, and K. Dautenhahn, "Practical and methodological challenges in designing and conducting interaction studies with human subjects.," AISB'05 Symposium on Robot Companions Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 110-120, 2005.
10. S. Woods, M. Walters, K. L. Koay, and K. Dautenhahn, "Comparing Human Robot Interaction Scenarios Using Live and Video Based Methods: Towards a Novel Methodological Approach," Proc. AMC'06, The 9th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Istanbul March 27-29, pp. 750-755, 2006.
11. S. N. Woods, M. L. Walters, K. L. Koay, and K. Dautenhahn, "Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials," Proceedings, 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2006), pp. 51-58, 2006.
12. H. Yan and M. J. Mataric', "General spatial features for analysis of multi-robot and human activities from raw position data," Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'02), pp. 2770-2775, 2002.
13. H. Huettenrauch, K. S. Eklundh, A. Green, and E. A. Topp, "Investigating Spatial Relationships in Human-Robot Interaction," Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS 2006), Beijing, China, pp. 5052-5059, 2006.
14. D. L. Gillespie and A. Leffler, "Theories of nonverbal behavior: A critical review of proxemics research," in Sociological Theory Vol I., 1983, pp. 120-154.
15. H. W. Smith, "Territorial Spacing on a beach revisited: A Cross-National Exploration," Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 44, pp. 132-137, 1981.
16. C. Albas, "Proxemic Behavior: A Study of Extrusion," Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 131, pp. 697-702, 1991.
17. C. Albas and D. Albas, "Aligning Actions: The case of subcultural proxemics," Canadian Ethnic Studies, vol. 21, pp. 74-82, 1989.
18. A. Leffler, D. L. Gillespie, and J. C. Conaty, "The Effects of Status Differentiation on Nonverbal Behavior," Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 153-161, 1982.
19. K. A. Krail and G. Leventhal, "The Sex Variable in the Intrusion of Personal Space," Sociometry, vol. 39, pp. 170-173, 1976.
20. L. Eastwood, "Personality, Intelligence and Personal Space among Violent and Nonviolent Deliquents," Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 6, pp. 717-723, 1985.
21. J. L. Williams, "Personal space and its relation to extraversion-introversion," Canadian-Journal-of-Behavioural-Science, vol. 3, pp. 156-160, 1971.
22. P. A. Andersen, L. K. Guerrero, D. B. Buller, and P. F. Jorgensen, "An Empirical Comparison of Three Theories of Nonverbal Immediacy Exchange," Human Communication Research, vol. 24, pp. 501-535, 1998.
23. C. Bartneck, T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kennsuke, "A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots.," Proceedings of the HCI International 2005, Las Vegas., 2005.
24. M. L. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri, René te Boekhorst, C. Nehaniv, I. Werry, and D. Lee, "Close Encounters: Spatial Distances between People and a Robot of Mechanistic Appearance," Proceedings of 2005 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 450-455, 2005.
25. D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, S. Woods, M. Walters, and K. L. Koay, "Looking Good? Appearance Preferences and Robot Personality Inferences at Zero Acquaintance," Proceedings of 2007 AAAI Spring Symposia, In Press.
26. T. Kim and P. Hinds, "Who should I blame? Effects of Autonomy and Transparency on Attribution in Human-Robot Interaction," Proc. 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2006), pp. 80-85, 2006.
27. K. G. Bailey, J. J. Hartnett, and F. W. Gibson, "Implied threat and the territorial factor in personal space," Psychological Reports, vol. 39, pp. 263-270, 1972.
28. A. Giddens, Sociology, 5 ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.
29. Y. Bar Haim, O. Aviezer, Y. Berson, and A. Sagi, "Attachment in infancy and personal space regulation in early adolescence," Attachment-and-Human-Development, vol. 4, pp. 68-83, 2002.
30. M. J. Strube and C. Werner, "Personal space claims as a function of interpersonal threat: The mediating role of need for control," Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 8, pp. 195, 1984.
31. R. Gockley and M. J. Mataric', "Encouraging Physical Therapy Compliance with a Hands off Mobile Robot," Proc. HRI06, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2006, pp. 150-155, 2006.
32. L. R. Goldberg, " A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models.," Personality Psychology in Europe, vol. 7, pp. 7-28, 1999.
33. G. Matthews, I. J. Deary, and M. C. Whiteman, Personality Traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
34. K. L. Koay, M. L. Walters, S. N. Woods, and K. Dautenhahn, "Empirical Results from Using a Comfort Level Device in Human-Robot Interaction Studies.," Proceeds of HRI06, pp. 194-201, 2006.
35. K.-L. Koay, D. S. Syrdal, M. L. Walters, and K. Dautenhahn, "Longditudinal Studies in HRI," Submitted manuscript, Submitted.
36. A. Kendon, Conducting interaction - Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. Cambridge, NY, USA: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1990.
37. J. K. Burgoon and S. B. Jones, "Toward a Theory of Personal Space Expectations and Their Violations," Human Communication Research, vol. 2, pp. 131-146, 1976.