A comparison of auditory evoked potentials derived from a monitor integrated module versus standard technique

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 120-126

  Fudickar, Axel ^b   Kluzik, Anna ^b   Weiler, Norbert ^b   Scholz, Jens ^c   Tonner, Peter Hans ^a   Bein, BerthoId ^b  

^a Klinikum Links der Weser   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Equipment and supplies; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; ELECTRODE; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL;

AGED; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; QUALITY CONTROL; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MALE;

EID: 65649102289     PISSN: 08984921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181990d00     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Newton DE. Electrophysiological monitoring of general intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:350-352.
2. Thornton C, Sharpe RM. Evoked responses in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:771-781.
3. Werner C, Kochs E. Monitoring of the central nervous system. Curr Opin Anaesth. 1998; 11:149-465.
4. Sala F, Krzan MJ, Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how? Childs Nerv Sysl. 2002;18:264-287.
5. Lennmarken C, Bildfors K, Enlund G, et al. Victims of awareness. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:229-231.
6. Gajraj RJ, Doi M, Mantzaridis H, et al. Analysis of the EEG bispectrum, auditory evoked potentials and the EEG power spectrum during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:46-52.
7. Nuwer MR, Aminoff M, Goodin D, et al. IFCN recommended standards for brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Eleetroeneephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:12-17.
8. Plourde G. Auditory evoked potentials. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:129-139.
9. Robinson K, Rudge P. Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1977;100:19-40.
10. Tackmann W, Strenge H, Barth R, et al. Auditory brain stem evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis. Investigations in patients with different degrees of diagnostic probability. Eur Neurol. 1980;19:396-401.
11. Banoub M, Tetzlaff JE, Schubert A. Pharmacologic and physiologic influences affecting sensory evoked potentials: implications for perioperative monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:716-737.
12. Lacquaniti F, Benna P, Gilli M, et al. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials and blink reflexes in quiescent multiple sclerosis. Eleetroeneephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979;47:607-610.
13. Doi M, Gajraj RJ, Mantzaridis H, et al. Relationship between calculated blood concentration of propofol and electrophysiological variables during emergence from anaesthesia: comparison of bispectral index, spectral edge frequency, median frequency and auditory evoked potential index. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78: 180-184.
14. Palm S, Linstedt U, Petry A, et al. Dose-response relationship of propofol on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) in cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:1006- 1010.
15. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monil Comput. 1999;15:85-91.
16. Johansen JW. Update on bispectral index monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:81-99.
17. Punjasawadwong Y, Boonjeungmonkol N, Phongchiewboon A. Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007;4:CD003843.
18. Jeleazcov C, Schneider G, Daunderer M, et al. The discriminant power of simultaneous monitoring of spontaneous electroencephalogram and evoked potentials as a predictor of different clinical states of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:894-901.