|
Volumn 1216, Issue 25, 2009, Pages 5020-5029
|
Evaluation of triproline and tri-α-methylproline chiral stationary phases. Retention and enantioseparation associated with hydrogen bonding
|
Author keywords
Average solvent volume ratio; Carbon donor hydrogen bonding; Chiral stationary phase; H bond; HPLC; Non standard mobile phase; Oligoproline; Triproline
|
Indexed keywords
AVERAGE SOLVENT VOLUME RATIO;
CHIRAL STATIONARY PHASE;
H-BOND;
HPLC;
NON-STANDARD MOBILE PHASE;
OLIGOPROLINE;
TRIPROLINE;
ACETONITRILE;
ATOMS;
BINDING SITES;
CHIRALITY;
CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS;
ENANTIOSELECTIVITY;
ESTERS;
ETHERS;
HEXANE;
HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
HYDROGEN;
SOLVENTS;
HYDROGEN BONDS;
ACETIC ACID ETHYL ESTER;
PROLINE;
TERT BUTYL METHYL ETHER;
TRI ALPHA METHYLPROLINE;
TRIPROLINE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
AMINO ACID ANALYSIS;
ARTICLE;
CHIRAL CHROMATOGRAPHY;
CHIRALITY;
ENANTIOMER;
ENANTIOSELECTIVITY;
HYDROGEN BOND;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SEPARATION TECHNIQUE;
ACETONITRILES;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID;
HEXANES;
HYDROGEN BONDING;
LINEAR MODELS;
OLIGOPEPTIDES;
PROLINE;
SOLVENTS;
STEREOISOMERISM;
WATER;
TETRA;
|
EID: 65649101312
PISSN: 00219673
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.04.063 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (35)
|