Part-set cuing in option generation

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 265-276

  Del Missier, Fabio ^a   Terpini, Chiara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; AGE; AGED; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COGNITION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY LEARNING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65549146870     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.3.265     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ALBA, J. W., & CHATTOPADHYAY, A. (1985). Effects of contest and part-category cues on recall of competing brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 340-349.
2. ANDERSON, M. C., BJORK, E. L., & BJORK, R. A. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
3. ANDERSON, M. C., & BJORK, R. A. (1994). Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 265-326). New York: Academic Press.
4. ASLAN, A., BÄUML, K.-H., & GRUNDGEIGER, T. (2007). The role of inhibitory processes in partlist cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 335-341.
5. BARSALOU, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227.
6. BASDEN, B. H., BASDEN, D. R., & STEPHENS, J. P. (2002). Part-set cuing of order information in recall tests. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 517-529.
7. BASDEN, D. R., & BASDEN, B. H. (1995). Some tests of the strategy disruption hypothesis of part-list cuing inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1656-1669. (Pubitemid 126004999)
8. BASDEN, D. R., BASDEN, B. H., & GALLOWAY, B. C. (1977). Inhibition with part-list cuing: Some tests of the item strength hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 100-108.
9. BÄUML, K. H., & ASLAN, A. (2004). Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 32, 610-617. (Pubitemid 39296293)
10. BÄUML, K. H., & ASLAN, A. (2006). Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: The role of encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 33-43. (Pubitemid 43283744)
11. BÄUML, K.-H., & KUHBANDNER, C. (2003). Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1188-1197. (Pubitemid 38270532)
12. BROWN, J. (1968). Reciprocal facilitation and impairment of free recall. Psychonomic Science, 10, 41-42.
13. DEL MISSIER, F., FERRANTE, D., & COSTANTINI, E. (2007). Focusing effects in predecisional information acquisition. Acta Psychologica, 125, 155-174.
14. EDGINGTON, E. S. (1972). A normal curve method for combining probability values from independent experiments. Journal of Psychology, 82, 85-89.
15. FISHER, R. A. (1948). Combining independent tests of significance. American Statistician, 2, 30.
16. FOOS, P. W., & CLARK, M. C. (2000). Old age, inhibition, and the part-set cuing effect. Educational Gerontology, 26, 155-160.
17. HUDSON, R. L., & AUSTIN, J. B. (1970). Effect of context and category name on the recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 43-47.
18. HULTSCH, D. F., & CRAIG, E. R. (1976). Adult age differences in the inhibition of recall as a function of retrieval cues. Developmental Psychology, 12, 83-84.
19. ISTAT (2007). La lettura di libri in Italia [Book-reading habits in Italy]. Retrieved from www.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/ non-calendario/ 20070510-00/.
20. JOHNSON, J., & RAAB, M. (2003). Take the first: Option generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 91, 215-229. (Pubitemid 36952872)
21. KARCHMER, M. A., & WINOGRAD, E. (1971). Effects of studying a subset of familiar items on recall of the remaining items: The John Brown effect. Psychonomic Science, 25, 224-225.
22. KISSLER, J., & BÄUML, K. H. (2005). Memory retrieval in schizophrenia: Evidence from part-list cuing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 273-280. (Pubitemid 40790619)
23. MARSH, E. J., DOLAN, P. O., BALOTA, D. A., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2004). Part-set cuing effects in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 19, 134-144.
24. MEHLE, T. (1982). Hypothesis generation in an automobile malfunction inference task. Acta Psychologica, 52, 87-106.
25. MOULIN, C. (2000, April). When it is good to forget: Evidence for intact retrieval inhibition in older adults. Poster presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Aging Society, Atlanta.
26. NICKERSON, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12, 531-552.
27. OSWALD, K. M., SERRA, M., & KRISHNA, A. (2006). Part-list cuing in speeded recognition and free recall. Memory & Cognition, 34, 518-526.
28. PEI, B. K. W., & TUTTLE, B. M. (1999). Part-set cuing effects in a diagnostic setting with professional auditors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 233-256.
29. PEYNIRCIOUǦLU, Z. F. (1987). On the generality of the part-set cuing effect: Evidence from nonmemory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 437-442.
30. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225-254.
31. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & NEELY, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213-242.
32. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, STELLON, C. C., & TULVING, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 174-188.
33. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & TULVING, E. (1974, May). Part-list cueing and directing forgetting. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
34. RUNDUS, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 43-50.
35. SERRA, M., & OSWALD, K. M. (2006). Part-list cuing of associative chains: Tests of strategy disruption. Journal of General Psychology, 133, 301-317. (Pubitemid 44328452)
36. SLAMECKA, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 504-513.
37. SLAMECKA, N. J. (1969). Testing for associative storage in multitrial free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 557-560.
38. SLOMAN, S. A. (1991). Part-set cuing inhibition in category-instance and reason generation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 136-138.
39. SLOMAN, S. [A.], ROTTENSTREICH, Y., WISNIEWSKI, E., HADJICHRISTIDIS, C., & FOX, C. R. (2004). Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 573-582. (Pubitemid 38652228)
40. STEWART, N., CHATER, N., & BROWN, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1-26.
41. THOMAS, R. P., DOUGHERTY, M. R., SPRENGER, A., & HARBISON, J. I. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment. Psychological Review, 115, 155-185.
42. TOMLINSON, T. D. (2007). The role of part set cuing and retrieval-induced forgetting in subjective probability judgments. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Maryland. Retrieved from hdl.handle.net/1903/7266.