The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1565-1584

  Albarracín, Dolores ^a,b   Mitchell, Amy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude strength; Confidence; Personality; Persuasion; Resistance; Selective exposure

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PERSONALITY; SELF CONCEPT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 10044238043     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271180     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3. Albarracín, D. (2002). Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 61-130). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Albarracin, D., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 453-469.
5. Altemeyer, R. A. (1969). Balancing the F-scale. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 417-418.
6. Aronoff, Y. S. (2001). When and why do hard-liners become soft? An examination of Israeli Prime Ministers Shamir, Rabin, Peres, and Netanyahu. In O. Feldman & L. O. Valenty (Eds.), Profiling political leaders: Cross-cultural studies of personality and behavior (pp. 185-201). Westport, CT: Praeger.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
8. Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-jndgmental versus operative indices of psychological properties: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
9. Byrne, D. (1961). The repression-sensitization scale: Rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality, 29, 463-468.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
11. Cannon, L. K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision and dissonance (pp. 83-95). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Festinger, L. (Ed.). (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Freedman, J. L. (1965). Confidence, utility, and selective exposure: A partial replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 778-780.
16. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. Journal of Psychology, 10, 249-254.
18. Henningham, J. P. (1996). A 12-item scale of social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 517-519.
19. Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172-194.
20. Johnson, B. T., Smith-McLallen, A., Killeya, L. A., Levin, K. D. (in press). Truth or consequences: Overcoming resistance to persuasion with positive thinking. In E. S. Knowles & J. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psythological Methods, 7, 19-40.
22. Malik, Y. K. (1982). Attitudinal and political implications of diffusion of technology: The case of North Indian youth. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 17, 45-73.
23. Marsella, A. J. (1975). Conformity and psychopathology: A comparative study of conformity behaviors in manic-depressive, paranoid schizophrenic and normal populations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 402-408.
24. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Introducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 191-229). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327-337.
26. Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1982a). A new look at selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 1-15.
27. Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M .P. (1982b). Repression-sensitization differences in responses to a decision. Journal of Personality, 50, 46-57.
28. Paul, G. L. (1966). Insight vs. desensilization in psychotherapy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741.
30. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Rokeach, M. (1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 61, 194-204.
32. Roper, E. (1965). Changes in public opinion and attitudes between generations: The politics of three decades. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 368-376.
33. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1-28.
35. Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2002, May). Failing to resist persuasion: Consequences for attitude strength. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
36. Scheussler, K. F. (1982). Measuring social life feelings. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
38. Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearance/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
39. Tesser, A. (2001). On the plasticity of self-defense. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 66-69.
40. Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1298-1313.
41. Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448-457.
42. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
43. Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
44. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.
45. Wilson, T. D., Gilbert, G. T., & Wheathey, T. P. (1998). Protecting our minds: The role of lay beliefs. In V. Y. Yzerbyt & G. Lories (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 171-201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Zanna, M. P., & Aziza, C. (1976). On the interaction of repression-sensitization and attention in resolving cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality, 44, 577-593.