Mechanism of cellulase reaction on pure cellulosic substrates

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1570-1581

  Gupta, Rajesh ^a   Lee, Y Y ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cello oligosaccharides; Cellulase; Crystallinity; DP; NCC

Indexed keywords

CELLO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES; CELLULASE; CRYSTALLINITY; DP; NCC;

ADSORPTION; CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; LADDER NETWORKS; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; PERCOLATION (SOLID STATE); POLYMERS; SUBSTRATES; SULFURIC ACID;

DYNAMIC POSITIONING;

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; SUGAR;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COTTON; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLYMERIZATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ADSORPTION; BETA-GLUCOSIDASE; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULASE; CELLULASES; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL PROCESSES; COTTON FIBER; CRYSTALLIZATION; GLUCANS; HYDROLYSIS; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; POLYMERS;

ADSORPTION; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINITY; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; PERCOLATION; POLYMERS; SUBSTRATES; SULFURIC ACID;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 65349184491     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22195     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Becker D, Braet C, Brumer H III, Claeyssens M, Divne C, Fagerstrom BR, Harris M, Jones TA, Kleywegt GJ, Koivula A, Mahdi S, Piens K, Sinnott ML, Stahlberg J, Teeri TT, Underwood M, Wohlfahrt G. 2001. Engineering of a glycosidase Family 7 cellobiohydrolase to more alkaline pH optimum: The pH behaviour of Trichoderma reesei Cel7A and its E223S/ A224H/ L225V/ T226A/ D262G mutant. J Biochem 356:19-30.
2. Cao Y, Tan H. 2005. Study on crystal structures of enzyme-hydrolyzed cellulosic materials by X-ray diffraction. Enzyme Microb Technol 36: 314-317.
3. Converse AO, Matsuno R, Tanaka M, Taniguchi M. 1988. A model of enzyme adsorption and hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with slow deactivation of the adsorbed enzyme. Biotechnol Bioeng 32: 38-45.
4. Divne C, Stahlberg J, Teeri TT, Jones TA. 1998. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 A long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J Mol Biol 275:309-325.
5. Eriksson T, Karlson J, Tjerneld F. 2002. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis oflignocellulosic substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 101:41-60.
6. Fengel D, Wegener G. 1984. Chapter on cellulose in wood: Chemistry, ultrastructure, reaction. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 66-105.
7. Fujishima S, Yaku F, Koshijima T. 1989. Recovery and reutilization of cellulases used for the hydrolysis of woods. V. Adsorption mechanism of β-glucosidase on cellulosic materials. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 35(9):845-850.
8. Gan Q, Allen SJ, Taylor G. 2003. Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: An overview, an experimental study and mathematical modeling. Proc Biochem 38:1003-1018.
9. Holtzapple MT, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C. 1990. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng 36:275-287.
10. Kim TH, Kim JS, Sunwoo C, Lee YY. 2003. Pretreatment ofcorn stover by aqueous ammonia. Bioresour Technol 90:39-47.
11. Kleywegt GJ, Zou JY, Divne C, Davies GJ, Sinning I, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, Srisodsuk M, Teeri TT, Jones TA. 1997. The crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of endoglucanase I from Trichoderma reesei at 3.6 A resolution, and a comparison with related enzymes. J Mol Biol 272:383-397.
12. Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Wohlfahrt G, Reinikainen T, Teeri TT, Piens K, Claeyssens M, Weber M, Vasella A, Becker D, Sinnott ML, Zou JY, Kleywegt GJ, Szardenings M, Stahlberg J, Jones TA. 2002. The active site of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei: The roles of aspartic acids D221 and D175. J Am Chem Soc 124(34):10015-10024.
13. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506-577.
14. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M. D 2005. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lig-nocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6):673-686.
15. Nummi M, Marja-Leena N, Arja L, Tor-Magnus E, Veijo R. 1983. Cello-biohydrolase from Trichoderma reesei. J Biochem 215:677-683.
16. Park S, Venditti RA, Abrecht DG, Jameel H, Pawlak JJ, Lee JM. 2007. Surface and pore structure modification of cellulose fibers through cellulase treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 103:3833-3839.
17. Ramos LP, Breuil C, Saddler JN. 1993. The use of enzyme recycling and the influence of sugar accumulation on cellulose hydrolysis by Tricho-derma cellulases. Enzyme Microb Technol 15:19-25.
18. Resse ET. 1977. Degradation of polymeric carbohydrates by microbial enzymes. Recent Adv Phytochem 7:311-367.
19. Sengupta S, Jana ML, Sengupta D, Naskar AK. 2000. A note on the estimation of microbial glycosidase activities by dinitrosalicylic acid reagent. Appl Microb Biotechnol 53:732-735.
20. Stalbrand H, Mansfield SD, Saddler JN, Kilburn DG, Warren RAJ, Gilkes NR. 1998. Analysis of molecular size distributions of cellulose molecules during hydrolysis of cellulose by recombinant Cellulomonas fimih-1,4-glucanases. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2374-2379.
21. Stamm AJ. 1964. Molecular properties of cellulose. In: Wood and cellulose science. New York: The Ronald Press company, pp. 78-121.
22. Suurnakki A, Tenkanen M, Sika-aho M, Niku-paavola ML, Viikari L, Buchert J. 2000. Trichoderma reesei cellulases and their core domain in the hydrolysis and modification of chemical pulp. Cellulose 7:189-209.
23. Valjamae P, Sild V, Nutt A, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1999. Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. Eur J Biochem 266(2):327-334.
24. Valjamae P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1998. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. Eur J Biochem 253(2):469-475.
25. Walker LP, Wilson DB. 1991. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: An overview. Bioresour Technol 36:3-14.
26. Wang L, Zhang Y, Gao P, Shi D Liu H, Gao H. 2005. Changes in the structural properties and rate of hydrolysis of cotton fibers during extended enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 93(3):443-456.
27. Wood TM. 1975. Properties and mode of action of cellulases. Biotechnol Bioeng 5:111-137.
28. Yang B, Willies DM, Wyman CE. 2006. Change in the enzymatic hydrolysis rate ofavicel cellulose with conversion. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(6):1122-1128.
29. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2005. Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 6:1510-1515.
30. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2006. A functionally based model for hydrolysis of cellulose by fungal cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:889-898.
31. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2004. Towards an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:797-824.