'Zigzag motion' goes in unexpected directions

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Anstis, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Global motion; Motion aftereffect; Motion coherence; Motion perception; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ARTIFACTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION;

EID: 65349167242     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.4.17     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alais, D., Verstraten, F. A., & Burr, D. C. (2005). The motion aftereffect of transparent motion: Two temporal channels account for perceived direction. Vision Research, 45, 403-412.
2. Ansns, S. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1982). Anomalous movement of random-dot fields. ARVO Conference, Sarasota, FL.
3. Anstis, S. M., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Mather, G. (1998). The motion aftereffect: A review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 111-117.
4. Baker, C. L., Jr., & Braddick, O. J. (1985a). Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception. Vision Research, 25, 803-812.
5. Baker, C. L., Jr., & Braddick, O. J. (1985b). Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion. Perception, 14, 181-192.
6. Barton, J. J., Rizzo, M., Nawrot, M., & Simpson, T. (1996). Optical blur and the perception of global coherent motion in random dot cinematograms. Vision Research, 36, 3051-3059.
7. Boulton, J. C., & Hess, R. F. (1990). The optimal displacement for the detection of motion. Vision Research, 30, 1101-1106.
8. Braddick, O. (1997). Local and global representations of velocity: Transparency, opponency, and global direction perception. Perception, 26, 995-1010.
9. Bravo, M. J., & Watamaniuk, S. N. (1995). Evidence for two speed signals: A coarse local signal for segregation and a precise global signal for discrimination. Vision Research, 35, 1691-1697.
10. Cleary, R., & Braddick, O. J. (1990). Masking of low frequency information in short-range apparent motion. Vision Research, 30, 317-327.
11. Culham, J. (2003). Attention-grabbing motion in the human brain. Neuron, 40, 451-452.
12. Curran, W., & Braddick, O. J. (2000). Speed and direction of locally-paired dot patterns. Vision Research, 40, 2115-2124.
13. Festa, E. K., & Welch, L. (1997). Recruitment mechanisms in speed and fine-direction discrimination tasks. Vision Research, 37, 3129-3143.
14. Hildreth, E. C. (1984). The measurement of visual motion (ACM Distinguished Dissertation). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Hildreth, E. C., & Koch, C. (1987). The analysis of visual motion: From computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 10, 477-533.
16. Hirahara, M. (2006). Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation. Vision Research, 46, 4623-4633.
17. Hiris, E., & Blake, R. (1992). Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 9025-9028.
18. Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L., Gerbino, W., & Verstraten, F. A. (2004). Blindness to inconsistent local signals in motion transparency from oscillating dots. Vision Research, 44, 2207-2212.
19. Kelly, D. H. (1979).Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatiotemporal threshold surface. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1340-1349.
20. Mather, G. (1980). The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception, 9, 379-392.
21. Mather, G., & Harris, J. (1998). Theoretical models of the motion aftereffect. In G. Mather, et al. (Eds.), The motion aftereffect (pp. 157-188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Mather, G., & Moulden, B. (1980). A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: Further evidence for a "distributionshift" model of direction coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 325-333.
23. Mather, G., Verstraten, F., & Anstis, S. (Eds.) (1998). The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1984). Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots. Vision Research, 24, 293-299.
25. Newsome, W. T., & Paré, B. E. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201-2211.
26. Nishida, S., & Sato, T. (1995). Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Research, 35, 477-490.
27. Qian, N., Andersen, R. A., & Adelson, E. H. (1994). Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 7357-7366.
28. Riggs, L. A., & Day, R. H. (1980). Visual aftereffects derived from inspection of orthogonally moving patterns. Science, 208, 416-418.
29. Shioiri, S., & Matsumiya, K. (2006). High spatial frequency of motion aftereffect [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):1086, 1086a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/1086/, doi:10.1167/6.6.1086.
30. Smith, A. T., Snowden, R. J., & Milne, A. B. (1994). Is globalmotion really based on spatial integration of local motion signals? Vision Research, 34, 2425-2430.
31. Snowden, R. J., & Braddick, O. J. (1989). The combination of motion signals over time. Vision Research, 29, 1621-1630.
32. Sutherland, N. S. (1961). Figural aftereffects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 222-228.
33. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. van de Grind, W. A., Verstraten, F. A., & Zwamborn, K. M. (1994). Ensemble models of the movement aftereffect and the influence of eccentricity. Perception, 23, 1171-1179.
35. van der Smagt, M. J., Verstraten, F. A., & van de Grind, W. A. (1999). A new transparent motion aftereffect. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 595-596.
36. Verstraten, F. A., Fredericksen, R. E., Grüsser, O. J., & van de Grind, W. A. (1994). Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion. Vision Research, 34, 1149-1155.
37. Verstraten, F. A., Fredericksen, R. E., & van de Grind, W. A. (1994). Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion. Vision Research, 34, 349-358.
38. Verstraten, F. A., van der Smagt, M. J., & van de Grind, W. A. (1998). Aftereffect of high-speed motion. Perception, 27, 1055-1066.
39. Vidnyánszky, Z., Blaser, E., & Papathomas, T. V. (2002). Motion integration during motion aftereffects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 157-161.
40. Watamaniuk, S. N., & Duchon, A. (1992). The human visual system averages speed information. Vision Research, 32, 931-941.
41. Watamaniuk, S. N., Flinn, J., & Stohr, R. E. (2003). Segregation from direction differences in dynamic random-dot stimuli. Vision Research, 43, 171-180.
42. Watamaniuk, S. N., & Sekuler, R. (1992). Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random-dot stimuli. Vision Research, 32, 2341-2347.
43. Williams, D. W., & Sekuler, R. (1984). Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research, 24, 55-62.
44. Zohary, E., Scase, M. O., & Braddick, O. J. (1996). Integration across directions in dynamic random dot displays: Vector summation or winner take all? Vision Research, 36, 2321-2331.