Reduction in the motion coherence threshold for the same direction as that perceived during adaptation

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 28, 2006, Pages 4623-4633

  Hirahara, Makoto ^a  

^a HOSEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Motion adaptation; Motion aftereffect; Motion coherence threshold; Speed; Unperceived motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL VISION; EYE MOVEMENT; HABITUAL ADAPTATION; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; AWARENESS; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 33750972869     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alais D., Verstraten F.A.J., and Burr D.C. The motion aftereffect of transparent motion: Two temporal channels account for perceived direction. Vision Research 45 (2005) 403-412
2. Anstis S., Verstraten F.A.J., and Mather G. The motion aftereffect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (1998) 111-117
3. Blake R., and Hiris E. Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Research 33 (1993) 1589-1592
4. Grunewald A. A model of transparent motion and non-transparent motion aftereffects. In: Touretzky D.S., Mozer M.C., and Haselmo M.E. (Eds). Advance in neural information processing systems Vol. 8 (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 837-843
5. Grunewald A., and Lankheet M.J.M. Orthogonal motion after-effect illusion predicted by a model of cortical motion processing. Nature 384 (1996) 358-360
6. Heinrich S.P., van der Smagt M.J., Bach M., and Hoffmann M.B. Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 469-475
7. Hiris E., and Blake R. Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 89 (1992) 9025-9028
8. Hock S.H., Schöner G., and Hochstein S. Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion directions. Vision Research 36 (1996) 3311-3323
9. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (1979) 65-70
10. Mather G. The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception 9 (1980) 379-392
11. Qian N., Andersen R.A., and Adelson E.H. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics. Journal of Neuroscience 14 (1994) 7357-7366
12. Rezec A., Krekelberg B., and Dobkins K.R. Attention enhances adaptability: Evidence from motion adaptation experiments. Vision Research 44 (2004) 3035-3044
13. Shaffer J.P. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46 (1995) 561-584
14. Sutherland N.S. Figural aftereffects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 13 (1961) 222-228
15. van de Grind W.A., Lankheet M.J.M., and Tao R. A gain-control model relating nulling results to the duration of dynamic motion aftereffects. Vision Research 43 (2003) 117-133
16. van der Smagt M.J., Verstraten F.A.J., and van de Grind W.A. A new transparent motion aftereffect. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 595-596
17. Verstraten F.A.J., and Ashida H. Attention-based motion perception and motion adaptation: what does attention contribute?. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1313-1319
18. Verstraten F.A.J., van der Smagt M.J., and van de Grind W.A. Aftereffect of high-speed motion. Perception 27 (1998) 1055-1066
19. Wilcox R.R. New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology 38 (1987) 29-60