Clinical effectiveness of Strassman operation in the treatment of bicornuate uterus;Efektywność kliniczna operacji Strassmana w leczeniu pacjentek z macicà dwurõnà

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 88-92

  Tomasz, Rechberger ^a   Marta, Monist ^a   Aleksandra, Bartuzi ^a  

^a II Katedra i Klinika Ginekologii   (Poland)

Author keywords

Safety; Treatment outcome; Uterus surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; POLAND; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERUS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPY; INFANT, NEWBORN; POLAND; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERUS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 65349163515     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor W, e[t al.]. Prevalence of mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet. 2000, 94, 9-12.
2. Maneschi F, Zupi E, Marconi D, [et al.]. Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic mullerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications. J Reprod Med. 1995, 40, 684-688.
3. Simon C, Martinez L, Pardo F, [et al.]. Mullerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 1991, 56,1192-1193.
4. Stampe Sorensen S. Estimated prevalence of mullerian duct anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988, 67, 441445.
5. Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984, 148, 140-146.
6. Buttram V, Gibbons W. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril. 1979, 32, 40-46.
7. Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, [et al.]. Congenital anomalies of the mullerian system. Fertil Steril. 1989, 51,747-755.
8. Harger J, Archer D, Marchese S, [et al.]. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1983, 62, 574-581.
9. Heinonen P, Pystynen P. Primary infertility and uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril. 1983, 40, 311-316.
10. Sarto G, Simpson J. Abnormalities of the Mullerian and Wolffian duct systems. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978, 14, 37-54.
11. American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal obstruction, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988, 49,944-955.
12. Rechberger T, Wróbel A. Klasyfikacja oraz leczenie operacyjne anomalii rozwojowych narza{ogonek}du rodnego. Ginekol Pol. 2005, 76, 921-925.
13. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego w zakresie wybranych patologii wczesnej cia{ogonek}ży oraz poste{ogonek}powania w cia{ogonek}ży po zapłodnieniu in vitro. Prz Menopauz. 2004, 6, 8-12.
14. Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, [et al.]. Re-examination of the anatomic indications for hysteroscopic metroplasty. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991, 39, 127-131.
15. Troiano R, McCarthy S. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004, 233, 19-34.
16. Strassmann E. Fertility and unification of double uterus. Fertil Steril. 1966, 17, 165-176.
17. Reuter K, Daly D, Cohen S. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology. 1989, 172, 749-752.
18. Ott D, Fayez J, Zagoria R. Congenital anomalies. In: Hysterosalpingography: a text and atlas. Ed. Ott D, Fayez J, Zagoria R. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1998, 59-69.
19. Fedele L, Ferrazzi E, Dorta M, [et al.]. Ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of "double" uteri. Fertil Steril. 1988, 50, 361-364.
20. Pellerito J, McCarthy S, Doyle M, [et al.]. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal ultrasound, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1992, 183, 795-800.
21. Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, [et. al.]. Magnetic resonance evaluation of double uteri. Obstet Gynecol. 1989, 74, 844-847.
22. Lolis D, Paschopoulos M, Makrydimas G, [et al.]. Reproductive outcome after Strassman metroplasty in women with a bicornuate uterus. J Reprod Med. 2005, 50, 297-301.
23. Papp Z, Mezei G, Gávai M, [et al.]. Reproductive performance after transabdominal metroplasty: a review of 157 consecutive cases. J Reprod Med. 2006, 51, 544-552.
24. Heinonen P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997, 4, 311-317.
25. Khalifa E, Toner J, Jones H Jr. The role of abdominal metroplasty in the era of operative hysteroscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993, 176, 208-212.
26. Ayhan A, Yücel I, Tuncer Z, [et al.]. Reproductive performance after conventional metroplasty: an evaluation of 102 cases. Fertil Steril. 1992, 57, 1194-1196.
27. Rackow B, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 19, 229-237.