Reproductive outcome after strassman metroplasty in women with a bicornuate uterus

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 297-301

  Lolis, Dimitrios E ^a   Paschopoulos, Minas ^a,b   Makrydimas, George ^a   Zikopoulos, Kostas ^a   Sotiriadis, Alexandros ^a   Paraskevaidis, Evangelos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Bicornuate uterus; Pregnancy outcome; Strassman metroplasty; Uterus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; LAPAROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT ABORTION; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STRASSMAN METROPLASTY; UTERUS BICORNIS; UTERUS MALFORMATION; UTERUS SURGERY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE BIRTH; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERUS;

EID: 18844428328     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, et al: Prevalence of müllerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Genet 2000;94:9-12
2. Propst AM, Hill JA: Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 2000;18:341-50
3. Semmens JP: Congenital anomalies of female genital tract: Functional classification based on review of 56 personal cases and 500 reported cases. Obstet Gynecol 1962;19:328-347
4. Rock JA, Jones HW: The clinical management of the double uterus. Fertil Steril 1977; 28:798-806
5. Rochet Y, Dargent D, Seffert P, et al: Hysteroplasty for hemiuterus and divided uterus: Apropos of 45 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1985;14:227-237 (in French)
6. Ludmir J, Samuels P, Brooks S, et al: Pregnancy outcome of patients with uncorrected uterine anomalies managed in a high risk obstetric setting. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:906-910
7. American Fertility Society: The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:944-955
8. Acien P: Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. Hum Reprod 1993; 8:122-126
9. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, et al: Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277-2281
10. Maneschi F, Marana R, Muzii L, et al: Reproductive performance in women with bicornuate uterus. Acta Europ Fertil 1993;24:117-120
11. Martinez-Frias ML, Bermejo E, Rodriguez-Pinilla E, et al: Congenital anomalies in the offspring of mothers with a bicornuate uterus. Pediatrics 1998;101:1-3
12. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE: Mullerian anomalies: A proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 1979;32:40-46
13. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al: Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:161-174
14. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P: Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies: An evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61:157-162
15. Jacobsen LJ, DeCherney A: Results of conventional and hysteroscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1376-1381