An obsolescence management framework for system baseline evolution-perspectives through the system life cycle

Systems Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-20

  Herald, Tom ^a   Verma, Dinesh ^a   Lubert, Caroline ^b   Cloutier, Robert ^a  

^a STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dmsms; Framework; Health assess ment; Obsolescence forecasting; Obsolescence management; Product selection; Product surveillance; System costing; Technology roadmapping; Technology transition; Trade study

Indexed keywords

DMSMS; FRAMEWORK; OBSOLESCENCE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT SELECTION; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE; SYSTEM COSTING; TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPPING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION; TRADE STUDY;

HEALTH RISKS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE;

OBSOLESCENCE;

EID: 65349115407     PISSN: 10981241     EISSN: 15206858     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sys.20106     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alignent (Sopheon-Alignent Software Inc.), Vision Strategist is a registered trademark for a technology roadmapping tool, http://www.alignent.com/ products/visionstrategist, 2008.
2. J. T. Boardman and A. J. Cole, Integrated process improve- ment in design and manufacture using a systems approach, Systems engineering for automation, Institution of Elec- trical Engineers Proceedings, Control Theory and Appli- cations, Vol. 143, No. 2, 1996, pp. 171-185.
3. CALCE Center, University of Maryland, Mitigation of Ob- solescence Cost Analysis (MOCA) is a product that pro- vides assembly-level obsolescence forecasting and assessment for production-phase change event schedul- ing, http://www.calce.umd.edu/con- tracts/MOCA/MOCA-Page.htm, 2008.
4. J. R Cares, R. J. Christian, and R. C. Manke, Fundamentals of distributed, networked military forces and the engineering of distributed systems, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, NUWC-NPT Technical Report 11, 366, New- port, RI, May 9, 2002, pp. 4-6.
5. B. T. Clegg and J. T. Boardman, A systems approach to process improvement in design and manufacture, Digest No. 1996/171, IEE Colloquium, November 11, 1996, pp. 3/1-3/9.
6. D&B Corp., DNBi Supply Management is a registered trade- mark for a component-level obsolescence forecasting and analysis tool, http://www.dnb.com/ us/dbproducts/supply-management/all-products/index.html, 2005.
7. DARPA, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Washington, DC, Technology Transition, Forward authored by William J. Perry, 1997.
8. DAU (Defense Acquisition University), Acquisition Commu- nity Connection, Executive Summary, Product Support, A program manager's guide to buying performance, Novem- ber 2001, https://acc.dau.mil/simplify /ev. php?ID=64799-201&ID2=DO-TOPIC.
9. DMSMS (Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages), Knowledge Sharing Portal, 2008, http://www.dmsms.org.
10. J. M. Duckles and E. J. Coyle, Purdue's Center for Technology Roadmapping: A resource for research and education in technology roadmapping, Proc IEEE Int Eng Manage- ment Conf, Cambridge, UK, August 18-20, 2002, Vol. 2, pp. 900-904.
11. C. H. Fine, Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage, Perseus Books, HarperCollins, New York, 1998.
12. N. Fleming, Coping with a revolution: Will the internet change learning? Knowledge management-emerging perspectives, systems-thinking, Lincoln University, Can- terbury, New Zealand, 2004, http://www.systems-think- ing.org/kmgmt/kmgmt.htm.
13. Frontier Techologies, Inc., ICE-Integrated Desktop Analy- sis and Planning System Cost Estimation tool suite is a registered trademark for an integrated costing capability, http://www.fti-net.com/AS/ICE/index.asp, 2008
14. Galorath, Inc., SEER tool suite is a registered trademark for an integrated cost estimating capability, http://www.ga- lorath.com/index.php/ products/hardware/C4, 2008.
15. R. Galvin, Science roadmaps, Science 280 (8 May 1998), 803.
16. M. L. Garcia and O. H. Bray, Fundamentals of technology roadmapping, SAND97-0665, Sandia National Labora- tory, Albuquerque, NM, http://www.sandia. gov /PHMCOE/pdf/Sandia%27sFundamentalsofTech.pdf, April 1997.
17. T. E. Herald, Rapid response system-level technology trade study, Nat Defense Indust Assoc (NDIA) 6th Annu Syst Eng Supportability and Interoperability Conf Proc, No. 4870, http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2003systems/herd. ppt, October 23, 2003.
18. T. E. Herald and D. Genaw, Technology and obsolescence sustainment for integrated COTS systems, Lockheed Mar- tin Joint Symp Eng Affordability, Reston, VA, April 14, 2005.
19. T. E. Herald and M. Hertz, Method and apparatus for estimat- ing the refresh strategy or other refresh influenced pa- rameters of a system over its life cycle, US Pat. Appl. Publish US 2004/0010474 A1, January 15, 2004.
20. T. E. Herald and J. Seibel, Technology management forecast- ing and predictions for system of interest analysis, Int Council Syst Eng (INCOSE) Mid-Atlantic Regional Conf (MARC), http://www.cotsresearch.com/publica- tions/Herald-Seibel-INCOSE-MARC-2004.pdf, September 30, 2004.
21. Z. Huang, P. A. Sandborn, M. Pecht, and R. Solomon, Life cycle forecasting of ASICs, Future Circuit International, Issue 7, Technology Publishing, London, UK, 2001, pp. 101-107.
22. i2 Technologies, Inc., TACTRAC and 4D Online Parts Uni- verse are registered trademarks for component-level ob- solescence forecasting and analysis tools, http://www.i2.com/assets/pdf/solutionareas/i2Tactrac3-lo.pdf, 2005 and http://www.i2.com/assets/pdf/solution-areas/partsu-pp-v2.pdf, 2005.
23. ISO/IEC 15288 (International Organization for Stand- ardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, Montreal, Canada), ISO/IEC 15288 2002 (E), Systems engineering-system life cycle processes, November 2002, Annex B.
24. T. A. Kappel, Perspectives on roadmaps: How organizations talk about the future, J Prod Innovation Management, Lisle, IL, Vo l 18 (2001), 39-50.
25. Kepner-Tregoe Consulting, Inc., Problem Solving and Decision Making (PSDM) is a trademarked Trade Study and Product Selection matrix methodology, http://www.kep- ner-tregoe.com/TheKTWay/WorkingWithKT-TeachYou -PSDM.cfm, 2008 and http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods-kepner-tregoe-matrix.html, 2008.
26. R. N. Kostoff and R. R. Schaller, Science and technology roadmaps, IEEE Trans Eng Management 48 (2) (2001), 132-143.
27. JA. Lane, Estimating system-of-systems development effort, Software Tech News 9 (1) (March 2006), https://www.soft- waretechnews.com/stn-view.php?stn-id= 4&article-id=8.
28. S. M. Lipp, Identifying mechanisms of technology transfer relative to the instantiation of technology, Dissertation, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 2002, pp. 5, 13-14, 72-90.
29. C. MacNulty, FORCEnet, the Naval component of the GIG- enabling the joint warfighter through network centric war- fare, Human Element Group Final Report V (21), National Defense Industrial Association, Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Division, Washington, DC, December 11, 2002.
30. J. Mandelbaum and S. Pallas, Reducing total ownership cost in DoD-increasing affordability of DoD systems, PM Mag (July-August 2001), 1-10, http://findarti- cles.com/p/articles/mi-m0KAA/is-4-30/ai-80128232.
31. J. C. Mankins, Technology readiness levels, Advanced Con- cepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology, NASA, Houston, TX, April 6, 1995, http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trl/trl.pdf.
32. M. J. Meixell and S. D. Wu, Scenario analysis of demands in a technology market using leading indicators, IEEE Trans Semiconductor Manufacturing 14 (1) (2001), 65-75.
33. MTI, Advanced Component Obsolescence Management (AVCOM) is a registered trademark for a component-level bill of material obsolescence forecasting and analysis tool, http://www.avcom.mtifwb.com/index.cfm?navid=26, 2008.
34. NUWC Division Keyport, Naval Undersea Warfare Center in Keyport, WA, Obsolescence Management Information Systems (OMIS) as an assembly-level analysis tool, http://www-keyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil/Leadership.htm, 2008.
35. OSD Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG), Operating and support cost estimating guide, Appendix C. Aircraft operating and support cost element structure definitions, http://www.dtic.mil/pae/paeosg15.html, May 1992.
36. M. Pecht, Electronic parts selection and management, Wiley, New York, 2003.
37. M. G. Pecht, T. Syrus, and D. Humphrey, Part assessment guidelines and criteria for parts selection and manage- ment, IEEE Trans Electronic Packaging Manufacturing 24 (4) (October 2001), 339-350.
38. M. G. Pecht, R. Solomon, P. A. Sandborn, C. Wilkinson, and D. Das, Life-cycle forecasting, Mitigation assessment and obsolescence strategies-a guide to the prediction and management of electronic parts obsolescence, CALCE EPSC Press, College Park, MD, 2002.
39. Price Systems L. L. C., Price Systems Costing tool suite is an integrated system costing suite, http://www.pricesys- tems.com/products/price- trueplanning.asp, 2008.
40. QTEC, a division of QinetiQ Ltd., Q-Star is a registered trademark for a component-level obsolescence forecast- ing and analysis tool, http://www.qtec.us/De- fault.aspx?p=DynamicModule&pageid=243330&ssid= 98668&vnf=1, 2008.
41. T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw Hill, New York, 1980.
42. J. Sagoo and J. Boardman, Formalisation of an order process- ing soft systems model using petri nets, Int Council Syst Eng 8th Annu Int Symp, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 26-30, 1998.
43. P. A. Sandborn and G. Plunkett, The other half of the DMSMS problem-software obsolescence, DMSMS Knowledge Sharing Portal Newsletter 4 (4) (June 2006), 3, 11.
44. P. A. Sandborn and P. Singh, Obsolescence driven design refresh planning for sustainment-dominated systems, Eng Economist 51 (2) (April-June 2006), 115-139.
45. P. A. Sandborn, T. E. Herald, J. A. Houston, and P. Singh, Optimum technology insertion into systems based on the assessment of viability, IEEE Trans Components Packag- ing Manufacturing Technol 26 (4) (December 2003), 734-738.
46. P. A. Sandborn, F. Mauro, and R. Knox, A data mining based approach to electronic part obsolescence forecasting, IEEE Trans Components Packaging Technol 30 (3) (Sep- tember 2007), 397-401.
47. R. R. Schaller, Technological innovation in the semiconductor industry: A case study of the international technology roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS), Dissertation, The Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University, Har- risonburg, VA, April 15, 2004.
48. P. Schutte, Complemation: An alternative to automation, J Inform Technol Impact 1 (3) (1999), 113-118.
49. J. S. Seibel, An attribute proposal for same vendor, version-to- version COTS upgrade decisions, Lockheed Martin Eng Process Improvement Center, Joint Symp, 2005, p. 12.
50. A. J. Shenhar and Z. Bonen, The new taxonomy of systems: Toward an adaptive systems engineering framework, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A: Syst Hum 27 (2) (March 1997), 137-145.
51. P. Singh, P. A. Sandborn, T. Geiser, and D. Lorenson, Elec- tronic part obsolescence driven product redesign planning, Int J Agile Manufacturing 7 (1) (2004), 23-32.
52. R. Solomon, P. A. Sandborn, and M. Pecht, Electronic part life cycle concepts and obsolescence forecasting, IEEE Trans Components Packaging Technol 23 (4) (December 2000), 707-717.
53. S. Tiku, Reliability capability evaluation for electronics manufacturers, Dissertation, University of Maryland, Col- lege Park, MD, 2005.
54. Total Parts Plus, Inc., Parts Plus is a registered trademark for a component-level obsolescence forecasting and analysis tool, http://www. totalpartsplus.com/partsPlus.aspx, 2008.
55. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., Hybrid Synergy Drive is a trademark of a gasoline-powered electric drive system, http://www.toyota.com/html/ hybridsynergyview/2004 /october/heartandsoul.html, 2005.
56. I. Tuomi, The lives and death of Moore's law, First Monday 7 (11) (November 2002) [further details, G. E. Moore, Chairman Emeritus of Intel Corporation, http://www.in- tel.com/technology/mooreslaw/index.htm].
57. R. Valerdi, The constructive systems engineering cost model (COSYSMO), Dissertation, University of Southern Cali- fornia, Los Angeles, CA, 2005.
58. R. Valerdi, Lean Advancement Initiative, http://lean. mit.edu/index.php?option=com-content&task=view&id=245&Itemid=1 and http://www.softstarsys- tems.com/COSYSMO-2006.htm, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2008.
59. D. Verma and L. H. Johannesen, Supportability engineering and logistics optimization/planning trends and challenges: A system integrator's perspective, Proc Int Logistics Cong, University of Exeter, May 1999.
60. D. Verma and G. Plunkett, Systems engineering and support- ability analysis: Technology refreshment for COTS-inten- sive systems, Proc Int Council Syst Eng (INCOSE), Minneapolis, MN, July 2000.
61. D. Verma, T. E. Herald, and J. Knezevic, Integration of sup- portability considerations into the system engineering process through focused modeling and simulation, 2nd Modeling, Simulation and Virtual Prototyping Conf, Ar- lington, VA, 1997, pp. 297-305.
62. D. Verma, T. Powers, B. S. Blanchard, R. G. Giffin, R. Webb, and D. J. VanBuskirk, COTS/NDI assessment and selec- tion methodology, INCOSE Symposium, Boston, MA, 1996.
63. M. C. Volker, Technology push vs. market pull, 9th Annu Canadian MBA Conf Management Technol, McMaster University, January 1988.
64. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, Technology readiness level, http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology-Readiness-Level, 2008.
65. J. J. Young, Jr., Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Ma- terial Shortages (DMSMS) management guidance, Memo for Distribution, Research Development and Acquisition, Washington, DC, January 27, 2005, p. 2.
66. J. A. Zachman, A framework for information systems archi- tecture, IBM Syst J 38 (2-3) (1999) [reprinted from IBM Syst J 26 (3) (1987), 454-470].