The sources are many: Exploring history teachers’ selection of classroom texts

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 244-265

  Grant, S G ^a   Gradwell, Jill M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b BUFFALO STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65349105276     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2005.10473281     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton Cook.
2. Barton, K. (1997). “I just kinda know": Elementary students' ideas about historical evidence. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4), 407-430.
3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Bohan, C. H. & Davis, O. L., Jr. (1998). Historical constructions: How social studies student teachers' historical thinking is reflected in their writing of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(2), 173-197.
5. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-14.
6. Cusick, P. A. (1983). The egalitarian ideal and the American high school. New York: Longman.
7. Dewey, J. (1902/1969). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Downey, M., & Levstik, L. (1991). Teaching and learning history. In J. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 400-410). New York: Macmillan.
9. Erickson, F. (1992). Why the clinical trial method doesn't work as a metaphor or educational research: A response to Shrag. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 9-11.
10. Fehn, B. & Koeppen, K. E. (1998). Intensive document-based instruction in a social studies methods course and student teachers' attitudes and practice in subsequent field experiences. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(4), 461-484.
11. Fitzgerald, F. (1979). America revised. New York: Vintage.
12. Gillaspie, M. K. & Davis, O. L., Jr. (1997-1998). Historical constructions: How elementary student teachers' historical thinking is reflected in their writing of history. International Journal of Social Education, 12(2), 35-45.
13. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
14. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Gradwell, J. M. (2005). Practicing the past: Primary sources and pedagogy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo.
16. Grant, S. G. (1996). Locating authority over content and pedagogy: Cross-current influences on teachers' thinking and practice. Theory and Research in Social Education, 24(3), 237-272.
17. Grant, S. G. (1997). A policy at odds with itself: The tension between constructivist and traditional views in the New York state social studies framework. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 13(1), 92-113.
18. Grant, S. G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U. S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Grant, S. G., Derme-Insinna, A., Gradwell, J. M., Lauricella, A. M., Pullano, L., & Tzetzo, K. (2001). Teachers, tests, and tensions: Teachers respond to the New York state global history exam. International Social Studies Forum, 1(2), 107-125.
20. Grant, S. G., Derme-Insinna, A., Gradwell, J. M., Lauricella, A. M., Pullano, L., & Tzetzo, K. (2002). Juggling two sets of books: A teacher responds to the new global history exam. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17(3), 232-255.
21. Grant, S. G., Gradwell, J. M., & Cimbricz, S. (2004). A question of authenticity: Examining the document based question on the New York state global history and geography Regents exam. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19(4), 309-337.
22. Grant, S. G., Gradwell, J. M., Lauricella, A. M., Derme-Insinna, A., Pullano, L., & Tzetzo, K. (2002). When increasing stakes need not mean increasing standards: The case of the New York state global history and geography exam. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(4), 488-515.
23. Kobrin, D. (1996). Constructing history. In Beyond the textbook (pp. 1-15). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
24. Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
25. Lapp, M., Grigg, W., & Tay-Lim, B. (2002). The nation's report card: U.S. History 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
26. LeCompte, M., Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
27. Levstik, L. (1989). Historical narrative and the young reader. Theory Into Practice, 28(2), 114-119.
28. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. McDiarmid, G. W. (1994). Understanding history for teaching: A study of the historical understanding of prospective teachers. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 159-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. McNeil, L. (1988). Contradictions of control. New York: Routledge.
31. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
32. New York State Education Department. (1996). Social studies resource guide. Albany, NY: Author.
33. Romanowski, M. (1996). The problems of bias in history textbooks. Social Education, 60(3), 170-173.
34. Seixas, P. (1998). Student teachers thinking historically. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(3), 310-341.
35. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
36. Stake, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
37. VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America's past. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. VanSledright, B., & Brophy, J. (1995). “Storytellers," “scientists," and “reformers" in the teaching of U.S. history to fifth graders. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 5, pp. 195-243). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
39. Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). '150 different ways' of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London, England: Cassell.
40. Wilson, S., & Wineburg, S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525-539.
41. Wineburg, S., & Wilson, S. (1991). Subject matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 305-347). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42. Yeager, E. A. & Davis, O. L., Jr. (1996). Classroom teachers' thinking about historical texts: An exploratory study. Theory and Research in Social Education, 24(2), 146-166.