Multifingerprint based similarity searches for targeted class compound selection

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1201-1213

  Kogej, Thierry ^a   Engkvist, Ola ^a   Blomberg, Niklas ^a   Muresan, Sorel ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEINS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SCREENING;

ACTIVE MOLECULES; MOLECULAR FINGERPRINTS; SIMILARITY INDEX; STARTING POINTS;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 33745686155     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0504723     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bender, A.; Glen, R. C. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3204-3218.
2. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.
3. Patterson, D. E.; Cramer, R. D.; Ferguson, A. M.; Clark, R. D.; Weinberger, L. E. Neighborhood Behavior: A Useful Concept for Validation of "Molecular Diversity" Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3049-3059.
4. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
5. Holliday, J. D.; Hu, C. Y.; Willett, P. Grouping of Coefficients for the Calculation of Inter-Molecular Similarity and Dissimilarity using 2D Fragment Bit-Strings. Comb. Chem. High-Throughput Screening 2002, 5, 155-166.
6. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 903-911.
7. Bajorah, J. Selected concepts and investigations in compound classification, molecular descriptor analysis, and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 233-245.
8. Matter, H. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1219-1229.
9. Xue, L.; Godden, J. W.; Bajorah, J. Evaluation of descriptors and minifingerprints for the identification of molecules with similar activity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1227-1234.
10. Xue, L.; Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorah, J. Profile scaling increases the similarity search performance of molecular fingerprints containing numerical descriptors and structural keys. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1218-1225.
11. Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc. http://www.daylight.com.
12. UNITY; Tripos Inc. http://www.tripos.com.
13. Rabow, A.; Cosgrove, D. Manuscript in preparation.
14. James, C. A.; Weininger, D.; Delany, J. Daylight Theory Manual; Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc., Jun. 2003. http://www.daylight.com/release/ manuals.html.
15. The Hologram fingerprint is generated with Sybyl (HQSAR module required) available from Tripos Inc. http://www.tripos.com; the parameters used in this study are as follows: length = 257, minimum number of atoms in a fragment = 4, maximum of atoms in a fragment = 7, atom flag = 1, bond flag = 1, connections flag = 1, hydrogen's flag = 0, chirality's flag = 0.
16. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of Hydrophobie (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772.
17. Oprea, T. I.; Gottfries, J. Chemography: The Art of Navigating in Chemical Space. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 157-166.
18. Schneider, G.; Neidhard, W.; Oilier, T.; Schmid, G. "Scaffold- hopping" by topological pharmacophore search: a contribution to virtual screening. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2894-2896.
19. Engkvist, O.; Kogej, T.; Blomberg, N.; Muresan, S. Manuscript in preparation.
20. Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A.; Popov, M.; Azzaoui, K.; Havill, B.; Schopfer, U.; Engeloch, C.; Stanek, J.; Acklin, P.; Rigollier, P.; Stoll, F.; Koch, G.; Meier, P.; Orain, D.; Giger, R.; Hinrichs, J.; Malagu, K.; Zimmermann, J.; Roth, H.-J. Key Aspects of the Novartis Compound Collection Enhancement Project for the Compilation of a Comprehensive Chemogenomics Drug Discovery Screening Collection. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 397-411.
21. http://openbabel.sourceforge.net.
22. Bender, A.; Mussa, H. Y.; Glen, R. C.; Reilling, S. Molecular similarity searching using atom environments, information-based feature selection, and a naïve bayesian classifier. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 170-178.
23. Bender, A.; Mussa, H. Y.; Glen, R. C.; Reilling, S. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of performance. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1708-1718.
24. FLUSH is an in-house program for cluster analysis and neighborhood mapping. It was used in combination to the Daylight fingerprint (Dave Cosgrove, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park).
25. Taylor, R. Simulation Analysis of Experimental Design Strategies for Screening Random Compounds as Potential New Drugs and Agrochemical. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 59-67.
26. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Org., Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3256-3266.
27. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1177-1185.
28. Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Anatomy of Fingerprint Search Calculations on Structurally Diverse Sets of Active Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2005, in print.