Comparison of glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression analysis to discriminate glaucomatous and healthy eyes

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 207-213

  Takmaz, Tamer ^a   Can, Izzet ^a  

^a ATATURK TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Glaucoma probability score; Heidelberg retina tomograph; Moorfields regression analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA PROBABILITY SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PACHOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 65249174092     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900206     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Quigley HA. Neuronal death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 1999; 18: 39-57.
2. Hattenhauer MG, Johnson DH, Ing HH, et al. The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2099-104.
3. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Volcker HE. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1044-9.
4. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, Rogers JB. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118: 9-15.
5. Dreher AW, Tso PC, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 221-9.
6. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, Graham SL, Drance SM, Gosine R. Ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995; 4: 242-7.
7. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557-63.
8. Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, Gomarasca S, Vavassori M, Orzalesi N. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 26-33.
9. Medved N, Cvenkel B. Diagnostic accuracy of the Moorfields Regression Analysis using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in glaucoma patients with visual field defects. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007; 17: 216-22.
10. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1730-42.
11. Harizman N, Zelefsky JR, Ilitchev E, Tello C, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph III. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 1390-2.
12. Leon-Ortega JED, Sakata LM, Monheit BE, Mcgwin G, Arthur SN, Girkin CA. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 525-32.
13. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, Arthes PH. Automated analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 5348-55.
14. Ferreras A, Pajarin AB, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Honrubia FM. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1981-7.
15. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, Ishikawa H, Kagemann L, Schuman JS. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 466-71.
16. Chauhan BC, Blanchard JW, Hamilton DC, LeBlanc RP. Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 775-82.
17. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, Hitchings RA. Identifying early glaucomatous changes: Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2272-7.
18. Hodapp E, Parrish RKII, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1993: 52-61.
19. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx nerve fiber analyzer, and optical coherence tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 985-93.
20. Vihanninjoki K, Burk RO, Teesalu P, Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Optic disc biomorphometry with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph at different reference levels. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002; 80: 47-53.
21. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg retina tomograph glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2653-60.
22. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1008-15.
23. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pueyo V. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 354-9.