Clinical studies beyond the German Drug Law: Studies for evaluating diagnostic tests;Klinische Studien Außerhalb des Arzneimittelgesetzes: Diagnosestudien

Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 425-432

  Abel, U ^a,c   Jensen, K ^b  

^a Tumorzentrum Heidelberg/Mannheim   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c C o Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Informatik   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diagnostic test; Evaluation; Methodology; ROC; Study design; Validity

Indexed keywords

TUMOR MARKER;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; GERMANY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; ROC CURVE; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 65249155888     PISSN: 14369990     EISSN: 14371588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-009-0825-5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Gross R, Löffler M (1997) Prinzipien der Medizin. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
2. Sadegh-Zadeh 1977 Metamed 1 76
3. Köbberling J, Trampisch HJ, Windeler J (1989) Memorandum zur Evaluierung diagnostischer Maßnahmen. Schattauer, Stuttgart New York
4. Feinstein 1975 Clin Pharmacol Ther 17 104
5. Schwarz JA (2005) Leitfaden klinische Prüfungen von Arzneimitteln und Medizinprodukten. Edition Cantor, Aulendorf
6. Committee For Medicinal Products For Human Use (CHMP) (2008) Guideline on clinical evaluation of diagnostic agents. Draft. European Medicines Agency, London. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/111998enrev1.pdf
7. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (2004) Guidance for industry. Developing medical imaging drug and biological products. Part 1: Conducting safety assessments. Part 2: Clinical indications. Part 3: Design, analysis and interpretation of clinical studies. Rockville, MD. http://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm
8. Grimes 2002 Lancet 359 881
9. Palli 1999 J Am Med Assoc 281 1586
10. The 1994 J Am Med Assoc 271 1587
11. Schünemann 2008 BMJ 336 1106
12. Lord 2006 Ann Intern Med 144 850
13. Schwarzer 2000 Statist Med 19 541
14. Galen RS, Gambino SR (1979) Norm und Normabweichung klinischer Daten. Fischer, Stuttgart New York
15. Abel 2003 Clinical Laboratory 49 379
16. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1991) Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Little, Brown & Co, Boston
17. Deeks 2004 Br Med J 329 168
18. Marienhagen J (2003) Evaluation der Thallium-201 (TI-201)-Chlorid-Single- Photon-Emission-Computed-Tomography (SPECT) zur Differentialdiagnose maligner supratentorieller Hirntumoren. Abschlussarbeit zur Postgraduellen Ausbildung Medizinische Biometrie. Abteilung Medizinische Biometrie, Universität Heidelberg
19. Hilgers 1991 Meth Inform Med 30 96
20. Hanley JA (1998) Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. In: Armitage P, Colton T (eds) Encyclopedia of biostatistics, Vol.5. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3738-3745
21. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK (2002) Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. Wiley-Interscience, Wiley, New York
22. Pepe MS (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
23. Toledano 2003 Statist Med 22 2919
24. Braun 2008 Biostatistics 9 364
25. Abel U, Holle R (2008) Bewertung der Güte von Mess- und Diagnoseverfahren: Bewertung der Validität. In: Rasch D, Herrendörfer G, Bock J et al (Hrsg) Verfahrensbibliothek - Versuchsplanung und -auswertung, 2. Aufl. Oldenbourg, München Wien; Kap. 6.11.3100-6/11/3600. (Text auf CD-ROM als pdf); S 1565-1580
26. Li 2008 Biostatistics 9 566
27. Internet-Adressen zu ROC Software: http://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/ Vortraege.5931.0.html#c10832, http://faculty.washington.edu/azhou/books/ software.doc
28. Abel U (1993) Die Bewertung diagnostischer Test. Hippokrates, Stuttgart
29. Mulherin 2002 Ann Intern Med 137 598
30. Ransohoff 1978 New Engl J Med 299 926
31. Goehring 2004 Statist Med 23 125
32. Irwig 2002 BMJ 324 669
33. Li 2007 Statist Med 26 3258
34. Köbberling J, Richter K, Trampisch HJ, Windeler J (1991) Methodologie der medizinischen Diagnostik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
35. Fryback 1991 Med Decis Making 11 88
36. Medical Services Advisory Committee (2005) Guidelines for the assessment of diagnostic technologies. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra. http://www.msac.gov.au
37. Bossuyt 2006 BMJ 332 1089
38. Vainio H, Bianchini F (2002) Breast cancer screening. IARC handbook of cancer prevention Vol 7. IARC Press, Lyon
39. Irwig 1994 Ann Intern Med 120 667
40. Reid 1995 J Am Med Assoc 274 645
41. Flynn K (1996) Assessing diagnostic technologies. Technology assessment program. Report No. 1. Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, VA Medical Center, Boston
42. Greenhalgh 1997 BMJ 315 540
43. Jensen 2000 Med Klinik 95 54
44. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR et al (2000) Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chapter 14.4: Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, pp 209-215
45. Deeks 2001 BMJ 323 157
46. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM et al (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/9
47. Knottnerus 2002 BMJ 324 477
48. Bossuyt 2003 Clinical Chemistry 49 1
49. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB et al (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/25
50. IQWiG - Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (2008) Allgemeine Methoden. Version 3.0 vom 27.05.2008. IQWiQ, Köln. http://iqwig.net/download/IQWiG-Methoden-Version-3-0.pdf
51. Leeflang MMG, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PMM (2008) Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy - new developments within the Cochrane Collaboration. Submitted for publication. http://dare.uva.nl/document/107241
52. Köbberling J (1985) Use and usefulness of diagnostic tests. The oral glucose tolerance test and the so called chlorpropamid alcohol flush test. In: Jesdinsky HJ, Trampisch HJ (Hrsg) Prognose- und Entscheidungsfindung in der Medizin. Proc. 30. Jahrestagung der GMDS. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 352-369