The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 385-395

  Sagi, Elad ^a   Kaiser, Adam R ^b   Meyer, Ted A ^c   Svirsky, Mario A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Gap duration identification; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE TEST; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65249125232     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0219)     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbas, P. J. (1993). Electro-physiology. In R. S. Tyler (Ed.), Cochlear implants: Audiological foundations (pp. 317-356). San Diego, CA: Singular.
2. Balkany, T., Hodges, A., Menapace, C., Hazard, L., Driscoll, C., Gantz, B., et al. (2007). Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 136, 757-762.
3. Bögli, H., Dillier, N., Lai, W. K., Rohner, M., & Zillus, B. A. (1995). Swiss Cochlear Implant Laboratory (Version 1.4) [Computer software]. Zürich, Switzerland: Authors.
4. Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception. II: Resolution in one-interval paradigms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483-502.
5. Busby, P. A., & Clark, G. M. (1999). Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear implant participants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1841-1852.
6. Donaldson, G. S., & Nelson, D. A. (2000). Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. The Journal ofthe Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1645-1658.
7. Dorman, M., Dove, H. J., Parkin, J., Zacharchuk, S., & Dankowski, K. (1991). Telephone use by patients fitted with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 12, 368-369.
8. Fitzgerald, M. B., Shapiro, W. H., McDonald, P. D., Neuburger, H. S., Ashburn-Reed, S., Immerman, S. et al. (2007). The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 127, 378-383.
9. Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. (1987). Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 133-137.
10. Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Wightman, F. L. (1982). Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 761-765.
11. Florentine, M., & Buus, S. (1984). Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 449-455.
12. Fu, Q. J. (2002). Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. NeuroReport, 13, 1635-1639.
13. Kewley-Port, D., & Watson, C. S. (1994). Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 485-496.
14. Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857.
15. Koch, D. B., Osberger, M. J., Segel, P., & Kessler, D. (2004). HiResolution™ and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution™ Bionic Ear: Using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 9, 214-223.
16. Lai, W. K., Bögli, H., & Dillier, N. (2003). A software tool for analyzing multichannel cochlear implant signals. Ear and Hearing, 24, 380-391.
17. Moore, C. B. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1988). Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1093-1101.
18. Muchnik, C., Taitelbaum, R., Tene, S., & Hildesheimer, M. (1994). Auditory temporal resolution and open speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients. Scandanavian Audiology, 23, 105-109.
19. Munson, B., & Nelson, P. G. (2005). Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2607-2617.
20. Peterson, G., & Lehiste, I. (1962). Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27,62-70.
21. Preece, J. P., & Tyler, R. S. (1989). Temporal-gap detection by cochlear prosthesis users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 849-856.
22. Schneider, B. A., & Hamstra, S. J. (1999). Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 371-380.
23. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: I Basic psychophysics. Hearing Research, 11, 157-189.
24. Shannon, R. V. (1989). Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2587-2592.
25. Shannon, R. V. (1990). Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 741-744.
26. Shannon, R. V. (1992). Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2156-2164.
27. Shannon, R. V. (1993). Psychophysics. In R. S. Tyler (Ed.), Cochlear implants: Audiological foundations (pp. 357-388). San Diego, CA: Singular.
28. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Fourakis, M. S., Hawks, J. W., Holden, T., Arcaroli, J., & Hyde, M. (2006). Evaluation of equivalency in two recordings of monosyllabic words. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 350-366.
29. Snell, K. B., & Frisina, D. R. (2000). Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1615-1626.
30. Staller, S., Menapace, C., Domico, E., Mills, D., Dowell, R. C., Geers, A., et al. (1997). Speech perception abilities of adult and pediatric Nucleus implant recipients using the spectral peak (SPEAK) coding strategy. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 117, 236-242.
31. Svirsky, M. A. (2000). Mathematical modeling of vowel perception by cochlear implantees who use the "compressed-analog " strategy: Temporal and channel-amplitude cues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of 'America, 107, 1521-1529.
32. Svirsky, M. A. (2002). The multidimensional phoneme identification (MPI) model: A new quantitative framework to explain the perception of speech sounds by cochlear implant users. In W. Serniclaes (Ed.), Etudes et Travaux (Vol. 5, pp. 143-186). Brussels, Belgium: Institut de Phonetique et des Langues Vivantes of the ULB (Free University of Brussels).
33. Teoh, S. W., Neuburger, H. S., & Svirsky, M. A. (2003). Acoustical and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 8, 269-285.
34. Tong, Y. C., & Clark, G. M. (1985). Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 1881-1888.
35. Tyler, R. S., Moore, B. C. J., & Kuk, F. K. (1989). Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 887-911.
36. Tyler, R. S., Preece, J. P., & Lowder, M. W. (1989). The Iowa audiovisual speech perception laser video disc [ Laser videodisc and laboratory report]. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
37. Waltzman, S. B., Cohen, N. L., & Roland, J. T. (1999). A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the Nucleus 22 and Nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems. The American Journal of Otology, 20, 435-441.
38. Wei, C., Cao, K., Jin, X., Chen, X., & Zeng, F. G. (2007). Psychophysical performance and mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 28, 62S-65S.
39. Zwolan, T. A., Kileny, P. R., Smith, S., Waltzman, S., Chute, P., Domico, E., et al. (2005). Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant. Otology and Neurotology, 26, 455-465.