Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue SUPPL.2, 2007, Pages

  Wei, Chaogang ^a   Cao, Keli ^a,b   Jin, Xin ^a   Chen, Xiaowei ^a   Zeng, Fan Gang ^b  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NOISE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34247560249     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031512c     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cao, K. (2004). Standardization of cochlear implants. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 39, 71-72.
2. Dorman, M. F., Smith, L. M., Smith, M., & Parkin, J. L. (1996). Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1174-1184.
3. Fu, Q. J., Zeng, F. G., Shannon, R. V., & Soli, S. D. (1998). Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 505-510.
4. Han, D. M. (2004). Current status of multi-electrode cochlear implants in China. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 39, 70-71.
5. Huang, T. S., Wang, N. M., & Liu, S. Y. (1995). Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement, 166, 294-298.
6. Kong, Y. Y., & Zeng, F. G. (2006). Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 2830-2840.
7. Lan, N., Nie, K. B., Gao, S. K., & Zeng, F. G. (2004). A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, 51, 752-760.
8. Lee, K. Y., van Hasselt, C. A., Chiu, S. N., & Cheung, D. M. (2002). Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children in comparison with normal-hearing children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 63, 137-147.
9. Liang, Z. A. (1963). Auditory perceptual cues in Mandarin tones. Acta Physiologica Sinica, 26, 85-91.
10. Luo, X., & Fu, Q. J. (2004). Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3659-3667.
11. Nelson, D. A., Van Tasell, D. J., Schroder, A. C., Soli, S., & Levine, S. (1995). Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1987-1999.
12. Nie, K., Stickney, G., & Zeng, F. G. (2005). Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, 52, 64-73.
13. Shannon, R. V. (1989). Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2587-2592.
14. Tyler, R. S., Moore, B. C., & Kuk, F. K. (1989). Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 32, 887-911.
15. Wei, C. G., Cao, K., & Zeng, F. G. Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects. Hearing Research. 197:87-95.
16. Xu, L., Li, Y., Hao, J., Chen, X, Xue, S. A., & Han, D. (2004). Tone production in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants: a preliminary study. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 124, 363-367.
17. Xu, L., Tsai, Y., & Pfingst, B. E. (2002). Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: Implications for cochlear prostheses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 247-258.
18. Xu, S. A., Dowell, R. C., & Clark, G. M. (1987). Results for Chinese and English in a multichannel cochlear implant patient. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 96 (Suppl 128), 126-127.
19. Zeng, F. G. (1995). Cochlear implants in China. Audiology, 34, 61-75.
20. Zeng, F. G. 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hearing Research 174, 101-106.
21. Zeng, F. G., Kong, Y. Y., Michalewski, H. J., & Starr, A. (2005). Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 3050-3063.
22. Zeng, F. G., Oba, S., Garde, S., Sininger, Y., & Starr, A. (1999). Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. Neuroreport, 10, 3429-3435.