Open versus closed laparoscopy entry - Which are the evidences?

Hepato-Gastroenterology

Volumn 56, Issue 89, 2009, Pages 75-79

  Opilka, Mieszko ^a   Starzewski, J ^a   Lorenc, Z ^a   Tarnowski, A ^b   Zawada, Z ^b  

^a Clinical Department of Surgery and Coloproctology   (Slovenia)

^b Silesia Med SA   (Poland)

Author keywords

Closed entry; Complications; Laparoscopy; Open entry; Pneumoperitoneum

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ABDOMEN; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; NEEDLES; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 64949196686     PISSN: 01726390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbuhl L: Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:275-280.
2. Vilos GA: The ABCs of a safer laparoscopic entry. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:249-251.
3. Kelty CJ, Super PA, Stoddard CJ: The driving force in trocar insertion: a comparision between disposable and reusable trocars. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14:1045-1046.
4. Moberg A.-C, Montgomery A: Primary access-related complications with laparoscopy; Comparision of blind and open techniques. Surg Endosc 2005; 19:1196-1199.
5. Hurd WW,Randolph JF Jr, Holmberg RA, Pearl ML, Hubbel GP: Open Laparoscopy without special instruments or sutures. Comparision with a closed technique. J Reprod Med. 1994; 39:393-397.
6. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Muir Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS: Evidence-Based Medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312:71-72.
7. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB: Evidence Based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. (2nd Ed.) London/ UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
8. Bridgewater FH, Mouton WG: Rationale and intended use for the Veress needle: a translation of the original descriptive article. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1999; 9:241-243.
9. Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, Kumari NA: Open Laparoscopy: 29-Year Experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96(5 Pt 1):763-766.
10. Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A: Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(8):1192-1196.
11. Rosen DM, Lam AM, Chapman M, Carlton M, Cario GM: Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1998; 53:167-174.
12. Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E: Major and minor injuries during creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15:566-9.
13. Rosen DM, Lam AM, Chapman M, Carlton M, Cario GM: Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998; 53:167-174.
14. Peitgen K, Nimtz K, Hellinger A, Walz MK: Open approach or Veress needle in laparoscopic interventions? Results of a prospective randomized controlled study Chirurg. 1997; 68:910-913.
15. Millat PB: Related Articles, Open pneumoperitoneum because of quality assurance. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19:1297-1299.
16. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi Ch, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W: The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16:1121-1143.
17. Capelouto CC, Kavoussi LR: Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Urology 1993, 42:2-12
18. Catarci M, Zaraca F, Mulieri G, Di Paola M, Montemurro L, Filippousis P, Greco E, Gosseti F, Carboni M: Routine use of open laparoscopy: technique and results in 1006 consecutive cases. Chir Ital. 1999; 51:151-158.
19. Guloglu R, Dilege S, Aksoy M, Alimoglu O, Yavuz N, Mihmanli M, Gulmen M: Major retroperitoneal vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004; 14:73-76.
20. Natali J: Forensic medical implications of vascular injuries in the course of video-endoscopic surgery. J Mal Vasc. 1996; 21:223-226.
21. Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB: Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed-versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190:634-638.
22. McKernan JB, Champion JK: Access techniques: Veress needle-initial blind trocar insertion versus open laparoscopy with the Hasson trocar. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995; 3:35-38.
23. Hurd WW, Randolph JF Jr, Holmberg RA, Pearl ML, Hubbell GP: Open laparoscopy without special instruments or sutures. Comparison with a closed. technique. J Reprod Med. 1994; 39:393-397.
24. Machado MA, da Rocha JR, Machado MC: An alternative technique for open laparoscopy. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 1998; 53:174-175.
25. Lombezzi R, Galleano R, Lucarini L, Falchero F: New technique for optical control of the first trocar insertion. Minerva Chir. 2002; 57:527-529.
26. Agresta F, De Simone P, Ciardo LF, Bedin N: Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18:1778-81.
27. Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL, Barkun JS: Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993; 3:296-299.
28. Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA: Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg. 1997; 21:529-533.
29. Elhage A, Lanvin D, Qafli M, Querleu D: The advantage of an umbilical micro-laparotomy, "open laparoscopy", for laparoscopic surgery. Experimental study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1996; 25:373-377.
30. Esposito C: Transumbilical open laparoscopy: a simple method of avoiding complications in pediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997; 12:226-227.