Complications of laparoscopy: An inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 190, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 634-638

  Jansen, Frank Willem ^a   Kolkman, Wendela ^a   Bakkum, Erica A ^b   De Kroon, Cor D ^a   Trimbos Kemper, Trudy C M ^a   Trimbos, J Baptist ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Closed laparoscopy; Complications; Entry technique; Laparoscopy; Open laparoscopy; Pneumoperitoneum

Indexed keywords

AERATION; ARTICLE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MEDLINE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEEDLE; NETHERLANDS; OBESITY; PATIENT SELECTION; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TROCAR; VERESS NEEDLE;

EID: 1642423751     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.035     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Härkki-Sirén P, Kurki T. Nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:108-12.
2. Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper GCM, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multi-center observational study. BJOG 1997;104:595-600.
3. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, et al. The European Association for Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1121-43.
4. Lingam K, Cole RA. Laparoscopic entry port visited: a survey of practices of consulted gynecologists in Scotland. Gynaecol Endosc 2001;10:335-42.
5. Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL, et al. Risk of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:296-9.
6. Morgan HR. Laparoscopy: induction of pneumoperitoneum via transfundal puncture. Obstet Gynecol 1979;2:260-1.
7. Hasson HM. A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;110:886-7.
8. Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Giufffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF. Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1997;84:599-602.
9. Pickersgill A, Slade RJ, Falconer GF, Attwood S. Open laparoscopy: the way forward. BJOG 1999;106:116-9.
10. Garry R. Complications of laparoscopic entry. Gynecol Endosc 1997;6:319-29.
11. Loffer FD, Pent D. Indication, contra-indications and complications of laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1975;30:407-23.
12. Mintz M. Risks prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases. J Reprod Med 1977;18:269-72.
13. Bergqvist BD, Bergqvist A. Vascular injuries during gynecological surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:19-23.
14. Querleu D, Chapron C, Chevallier L, Bruhat MA. Complications of gynecological laparoscopic surgery - a French multicenter collaborative study [letter]. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1355.
15. Tsaltas J, Healy DL, Lloyd D. Review of major complications of laparoscopy in a free-standing gynecological day case hospital. Gynecol Endosc 1996;5:265-70.
16. Bateman BG, Kolp LA, Hoeger K. Complications of laparoscopy-operative or diagnostic. Fertil Steril 1996;66:30-5.
17. Härkki-Sirén P. The incidence of entry-related laparoscopic injuries in Finland. Gynaecol Endosc 1999;8:335-8.
18. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA, Madelenat P, Fernandez H, Pierre F, et al. Surgical complications on diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod 1998;13:867-72.
19. Ballem RV, Rudomanski J. Techniques of pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1933;3:42-3.
20. Hurd WW, Randolph JF, Holmberg RA, Pearl ML, Hubbell GP. Open laparoscopy without special instruments or sutures: comparison with a closed technique. J Reprod Med 1994;39:393-7.
21. Levy BS, Hulka JF, Peterson HB, Phillips JM. Operative laparoscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1993 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1:301-5.
22. Peitgen K, Nimtz K, Hellinger A, Walz MK. Open approach or Veress needle in laparoscopic intervention? Results of a prospective randomized controlled study [in German]. Chirurg 1997;68:910-3.
23. Saunders C, Battistella F, Whetzel T, Stokes R. Percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage using a Veress needle versus an open technique: a prospective randomized trial. J Trauma 1998;44:883-8.
24. Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta FP, Micali B. Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:353-5.
25. Gulla N, Patriti A, Lazazarina F, Tristaino B. Our choice of the method to induce pneumoperitoneum in videolaparoscopic surgery [in Italian]. Minerva Chirg 2000;55:371-5.
26. Krebs HB. Intestinal injury in gynecologic surgery: a ten-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:509-14.
27. Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Goffinet F, Breart G, Dubuisson JB. Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynecologic pathology: results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1334-42.
28. Namnoum HB, Murphy AA. Diagnostic and operative laparoscopy. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD, editors. Te Linde's operative gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 389. p. 413.
29. Brosens I, Gordon A. Bowel injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey. Gynaecol Endosc 2001;10:141-5.
30. Phillips JM. Complications in laparoscopy. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1977;15:157-62.