Open pneumoperitoneum because of quality assurance [2]

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1297-1299

  Millat, P B ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TROCAR;

HUMANS; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 26844515627     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0111-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bateman BG, Kolp LA, Hoeger K (1996) Complications of laparoscopy: operative and diagnostic. Fertil Steril 66: 30-35
2. Blumenthal D (1996) Quality of health care: Part 4. The origins of the quality-of-care debate. N Engl J Med 335: 1146-1149
3. Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Giuffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF (1997) Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84: 599-602
4. Borgatta L, Gruss L, Barad D, Kaali SG (1990) Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle use for laparoscopic sterilization. J Reprod Med 35: 891-894
5. Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Lilford RJ (2001) Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a "trial effect." J Clin Epidemiol. 4: 217-224
6. Byron JW, Markenson G, Miyazawa K (1993) A randomized comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177: 259-262
7. Chapron C, Pierre F, Querleu D, Dubuisson JB (2000) Major vascular complications from gynecologic laparoscopy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 28: 880-887
8. Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta FP, Micali B (1998) Blind vs open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 353-355
9. Donabedian A (1980) Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality of medical care. Med Care Rev 37: 653-698
10. Geers J, Holden C (1996) Major vascular injury as a complication of laparoscopic surgery: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Am Surg. 62: 377-379
11. Gulla N, Patriti A, Lazzarini F, Tristaino B (2000) Our choice of the method to induce pneumoperitoneum in videolaparoscopic surgery. Minerva Chir 55: 371-375
12. Hasson HM (1978) Open laparoscopy vs closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates. Adv Plan Parenthood 13: 41-50
13. Leape LL (1994) Error in medicine. JAMA 272: 1851-1857
14. Mayol J, Garcia Aguilar J, Ortiz Oshiro E, De Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21: 529-533
15. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90: 668-679
16. Moberg A-C, Montgomery A (2005). Primary access-related complications with laparoscopy: comparison of blind and open techniques 19: 1196-1199
17. Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, Nezhat C (1991) Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 78: 148-150
18. Nordestgaard AG, Bodily KC, Osborne RW Jr, Buttorff JD (1995) Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 169: 543-545
19. Peitgen K, Nimtz K, Hellinger A, Walz MK (1997) Offener zugang oder Veress-nadel bei laparoskopischen eingriffen? Ergebnisse einer prospektiv randomisierten studie. [Open approach or Veress needle in laparoscopic interventions? Results of a prospective randomized controlled study.] Chirurg 68: 910-913
20. Saunders C, Battistella F, Whetzel T, Stokes R (1998) Percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage using a Veress needle versus an open technique: a prospective randomized trial. J Trauma 44: 883-888
21. Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL, Barkun JS (1993) Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 296-299
22. Usal H, Sayad P, Hayek N, Hallak A, Huie F, Ferzli G (1998) Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an institutional review of experience with 2589 procedures and literature review. Surg Endosc 12: 960-962
23. Vilos GA (2000) Litigation of laparoscopic major vessel injuries in Canada. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 7: 503-509
24. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M (2001) Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 323: 511
25. Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP, Hetz SP, Rich NM (1996) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 224: 145-154
26. Wherry DC, Rob CG, Marohn MR, Rich NM (1994) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 220: 626-634