Interference between cues of the same outcome in a non-causally framed scenario

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 328-332

  Luque, David ^a   Morís, Joaquín ^a   Cobos, Pedro L ^a   López, Francisco J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Causality; Interference; Learning; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LEARNING;

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; CAUSAL MODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COLOR; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64949148650     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bouton M.E. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol. Bull. 114 (1993) 80-99
2. Cobos P.L., López F.J., and Luque D. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 60 (2007) 369-386
3. Dickinson A., and Burke J. Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. B 49 (1996) 60-80
4. Escobar M., Matute H., and Miller R.R. Cues trained apart compete for behavioral control in rats: convergence with the associative interference literature. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130 (2001) 97-115
5. Escobar M., and Miller R.R. Timing in retroactive interference. Learn. Behav. 31 (2003) 257-272
6. Escobar M., Pineño O., and Matute H. A comparison between elemental and compound training of cues in retrospective revaluation. Anim. Learn. Behav. 30 (2002) 228-238
7. Keppel G., Bonge D., Strand B.Z., and Parker J. Direct and indirect interference in the recall of paired associates. J. Exp. Psycho. 88 (1971) 414-422
8. Lipp O.V., and Dal Santo L. Cue competition between elementally trained stimuli: US miscuing, interference, and US omission. Learn. Motiv. 33 (2002) 327-346
9. Luque D., Cobos P.L., and López F.J. Interference between cues requires a causal scenario: favourable evidence for causal reasoning models in learning processes. Learn. Motiv. 39 (2008) 196-208
10. Matute H., and Pineño O. Stimulus competition in the absence of compound conditioning. Anim. Learn. Behav. 26 (1998) 3-14
11. Matute H., and Pineño O. Cue competition in the absence of compound training: its relation to paradigms of competition between outcomes. In: Medin D.L. (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 38 (1998), Academic Press, San Diego 45-81
12. Miller R.R., and Escobar M. Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration. Behav. Process. 57 (2002) 163-185
13. Pineño O., Ortega N., and Matute H. The relative activation of the associations modulates interference between elementally trained cues. Learn. Motiv. 31 (2000) 128-152
14. Rescorla R.A., and Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black A.H., and Prokasy W.F. (Eds). Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory (1972), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 64-99
15. Stout S.C., and Miller R.R. Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychol. Rev. 114 (2007) 583-759
16. Van Hamme L.J., and Wasserman E.A. Cue competition in causality judgments: the role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learn. Motiv. 25 (1994) 127-151
17. Vadillo M.A., Castro L., Matute H., and Wasserman E.A. Backward blocking: the role of within-compound associations and interference between cues trained apart. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 61 (2008) 185-193