A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 268-273

  Otani, Koji ^a   Sato, Katsuhiko ^a   Yabuki, Shoji ^a   Iwabuchi, Masumi ^a   Kikuchi, Shinichi ^a  

^a FUKUSHIMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alignment; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Laminoplasty; Neck and or shoulder complaints; Outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPANESE; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM; MALE; NECK PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONDYLOSIS; STATISTICS; VERTEBRAL CANAL;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL CANAL; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 64849111821     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195b27a     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2003;28:1258-62.
2. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, et al. Lordotic alignmnet and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol 1996; 243:626-32.
3. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 1996;21:203-11.
4. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 2001;26:479-87.
5. Hosono N, Yonenobu K,Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 1996;21:1969-73.
6. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus lamin-oplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001;26:1443-8.
7. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, et al. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 1995;19:116-21.
8. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following en block cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2001;83:1798-802.
9. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) 1995;77:956-61.
10. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 1988;13:870-6.
11. Japanese Ortopaedic Association: scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1994;68:490-503.
12. Hirabayashi K, Miyakaya J, Satomi K, et al. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 1981;6:354-64.
13. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994; 19:507-10.
14. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Sasaki K, et al. Tension-band laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Int Orthop 1996;20:275-84.
15. Itoh T, Tsuji H. Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine 1985;10:729-36.
16. Sakuura H, HosonoN, Mukai Y, et al. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Review of the literature. Spine 2003;28:2447-51.
17. Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 1998;23:2057- 62.
18. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, et al. Axial symptoms after en block cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Dis 1999;12:392-5.
19. Morio Y, Yamamoto K, Teshima R, et al. Clinicoradiologic study of cervical laminoplasty with posterolateral fusion of bone graft. Spine 2000;25:190-6.
20. Miyazaki K, Tada K, Matsuda Y, et al. Posterior extensive simultaneous multisegment decompression with posterolateral fusion for cervical myelop-athy with cervical instability and kyphotic and/or S-shaped deformities. Spine 1989;14:1160-70.
21. Fukui K, Kataoka O, Sho T, et al. Pathomechanism, pathogenesis, and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dynamic canal stenosis. Spine 1990;15:1148-52.
22. Iizuka H, Shimizu T, Tateno K, et al. Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty. Morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine 2001;2220-6.
23. Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Aburakawa, et al Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty. Spine 2005;30:2544-9.
24. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, et al. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2003; 28:2667-72.
25. Penning L. Some aspects of pain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy. Neurol 1962;12:513-9.
26. Yabuki S, Kikuchi S. Endoscopic partial laminectomy for cervical myelopa-thy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:170-4.