Banking permits: Economic efficiency and distributional effects

Journal of Policy Modeling

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 382-403

  Bosetti, Valentina ^a   Carraro, Carlo ^b   Massetti, Emanuele ^c  

^a FONDAZIONE ENI ENRICO MATTEI   (Italy)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^c ENI S P A   (Italy)

Author keywords

Banking; Emission trading

Indexed keywords

EID: 64749105823     PISSN: 01618938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2008.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. In: Aldy J., and Stavins R.N. (Eds). Architectures for agreement: Addressing global climate change in the Post-Kyoto World (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK September 2007
2. Babiker, M. H., Jacoby, H. D., Reilly, J. M., & Reiner, D. M. (2002). The evolution of a climate regine: Kyoto to Marrakech. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 82.
3. Bosetti V., Carraro C., Galeotti M., Massetti E., and Tavoni M. WITCH: A world induced technical change hybrid model. The Energy Journal (2006) 13-38 Special issue on hybrid modeling of energy-environment policies: Reconciling bottom-up and top-down
4. Bosetti V., Carraro C., Massetti E., and Tavoni M. Optimal energy investment and R&D strategies to stabilise greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 95.07 (2007)
5. Bosetti V., Massetti E., and Tavoni M. FEEM's WITCH model: Structure, baseline, solutions. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 10.07 (2007)
6. Bosetti V., Carraro C., Massetti E., and Tavoni M. International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Energy Economics 30 6 (2008) 2912-2929
7. Carraro C., and Galeotti M. Does endogenous technical change make a difference in climate change policy analysis? A robustness exercise with the FEEM-RICE model. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 152.04 (2004)
8. Coase R.H. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1960) 1-44
9. Cronshaw M., and Kruse J.B. Regulated firms in pollution permit markets with banking. Journal of Regulatory Economics 9 2 (1996) 179-189
10. Godby R.W., Mestelman S., Muller R.A., and Welland J.D. Emissions trading with shares and coupons when control over discharges is uncertain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 3 (1997) 359-381
11. Innes R. Stochastic pollution, costly sanctions, and optimality of emission permit banking. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 3 (2003) 546-568
12. Kling C., and Rubin J. Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. Journal of Public Economics 64 1 (1997) 101-115
13. Leiby P., and Rubin J. Bankable permits for the control of stock and flow pollutants: Optional intertemporal greenhouse gas emission trading. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 3 (2001) 229-256
14. Liski M., and Montero J.-P. A note on market power in an emission permits market with banking. Environmental and Resource Economics 31 2 (2005) 159-173
15. 2 emissions. Working Paper 01-12, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
16. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., & Pan, J. (2001). Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, UK. pp. 700.
17. Newell, R., Pizer, W., & Zhang, J. (2003). Managing permits markets to stabilize prices. RFF Discussion Paper 03-34, Washington, DC.
18. Rubin J. A model of intertemporal emission trading, banking and borrowing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 3 (1996) 269-286
19. Springer U. The market for tradable GH permits under the Kyoto protocol: A survey of model studies. Energy Economics 25 5 (2003) 527-551