The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A survey of model studies

Energy Economics

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 527-551

  Springer, Urs ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Climate change; Kyoto Protocol; Modeling; Tradable permits

Indexed keywords

COSTS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

PERMITS;

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY;

ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY MARKET; GREENHOUSE GAS; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

EID: 0141671717     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00103-2     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Babiker, M.H., Jacoby, H.D., Reilly, J.M., Reiner, D.M., 2002, The Evolution of a Climate Regime: Kyoto to Marrakech, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 82, Cambridge, MA
2. 2 emission permits Int. J. Global Energy Iss. 12 1999 283-291
3. 2 emission reduction units Environ. Model. Assess. 6 2001 173-182
4. Baron, R., 1999. An Assessment of Liability Rules for International GHG Emissions Trading, IEA Information Paper, International Energy Agency, Paris
5. Baron, R., 2001. The Commitment Period Reserve, OECD and IEA Information Paper, International Energy Agency, Paris
6. Barrett S. The political economy of the Kyoto Protocol Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 14 1998 20-39
7. Bernstein P.M. Montgomery W.D. Rutherford T.F. Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: Results from the MS-MRT model Resour. Energy Econ. 21 1999a 375-413
8. Bernstein, P.M., Montgomery, W.D., Rutherford, T.F., Yang, G.F., 1999b. Effects of restrictions on international permit trading: the MS-MRT model. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 221-256
9. Bernard, A., Vielle, M., 2001. Conséquences de la non ratification du Protocole de Kyoto par les Etats-Unis: Une évaluation quantitative préliminaire avec le modèle GEMINI-E3/GemWTraP, Institut d'Economie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, mimeo
10. Bernard, A., Reilly, J., Vielle, M., Viguier, L., 2002. The Effects of US Withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol on International Emission Trading, Paper prepared for the International Energy Workshop jointly organized by the Energy Modeling Forum (EMF), International Energy Agency (IEA) and IIASA, 18-20 June 2002 at Stanford University
11. Blanchard, O., Criqui, P., Kitous, A., 2002. After The Hague, Bonn and Marrakech: The Future International Market for Emissions Permits and the Issue of Hot Air, Institut d'économie et de politique de l'énergie (IEPE), Cahier de recherche No. 27bis, Grenoble
12. Böhringer C. Cooling down hot air: A global CGE analysis of Post-Kyoto carbon abatement strategies Energy Policy 28 2000 779-789
13. Böhringer C. Climate politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From little to nothing? Energy J. 23 2002 51-71
14. Bollen, J., Gielen, A., Timmer, H., 1999. Clubs, Ceilings and CDM: Macroeconomics of compliance with the Kyoto Protocol. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 177-206
15. Brown, St., Kennedy, D., Polidano, C., et al., 1999. Economic Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol. Accounting for the Three Major Greenhouse Gases, ABARE Research Report 99.6, Canberra
16. Burniaux, J.-M., 2000. A Multi-Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol, OECD Economics Department, Paris
17. Capros, P., 1999. European Emission Mitigation Policy and Technological Evolution: Economic Evaluation with the GEM-E3 Model: Final Report, National Technical University of Athens, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, E3M-Lab
18. Chomitz, K.M., 1998. Baselines for Greenhouse Gas Reductions: Problems, Precedents, Solutions, Development Research Group, The World Bank, Washington DC
19. Ciorba, U., Lanza, A., Pauli, F., 2001. Kyoto Protocol an Emission Trading: Does the US make a Difference? FEEM working paper 90.2001, Milan
20. Cooper, A., Livermore, S., Rossi, V., Wilson, A., Walker, J., 1999. The economic implications of reducing carbon emissions: A cross-country quantitative investigation using the oxford global macroeconomic and energy model. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 367-390
21. 2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: An assessment using the POLES model Energy Policy 27 1999 585-601
22. 2 reduction under flexibility mechanisms and technical progress Int. J. Global Energy Iss. 14 2000 155-168
23. Den Elzen M.G.J. de Moor A.P.G. Evaluating the Bonn-Marrakesh agreement Clim. Policy 2 2002 111-117
24. 2 Emissions Trading, Policy Research Working Paper 2019, World Bank, Washington, DC
25. Ellerman A.D. Wing I.S. Supplementarity: An invitation to monopsony? Energy J. 21 2000 29-95
26. Ellerman A.D. Joskow P.L. Schmalensee R. Montero J.-P. Bailey E.M. Markets for Clean Air the US Acid Rain Program 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
27. Ellis, J., Bosi, M., 1999. Options for Project Emission Baselines, OECD/IEA Information Paper, Paris
28. Energy Information Agency (EIA), 2000. International Energy Outlook 2000, US Department of Energy, Washington
29. Eyckmans, J., van Regemorter, D., van Steenberghe, V., 2001. Is Kyoto Fatally Flawed? An analysis with MacGEM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Applied Economic Sciences, Working paper No. 2001-18
30. 2 abatement policies Resour. Energy Econ. 21 1999 211-253
31. 2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 39 2000 1-38
32. 2 emissions Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 18 1993 397-478
33. Grubb M. Vrolijk C. Brack D. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment 1999 Royal Institute of International Affairs London
34. Grubb, M., Köhler, J., Anderson, D., 2002. Induced Technical Change in Energy and Environmental Modeling: Analytic Approaches and Policy Implications, Annual Review of Energy and Environment, forthcoming
35. Hagem, C., Holtsmark B., 2001. From Small to Insignificant: Climate Impact of the Kyoto Protocol with and without the US, CICERO Policy Note 2001-01, Oslo
36. Hahn, R.W., Stavins, R.N., 1999. What has Kyoto Wrought? The Real Architecture of International Permit Markets, Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 99-30
37. Haites, E.F., 1998. Estimate of the Potential Market for Cooperative Mechanisms 2010, Margaree Consultants Inc., unpublished manuscript, Toronto, September 11, 1998
38. Haites, E.F., Missfeldt, F., 2001. Analysis of the Proposed Commitment Period Reserve Rule at the National and Global Levels, Report prepared for EPRI, Palo Alto
39. Holtsmark B. Maestad O. Emissions trading under the Kyoto Protocol. Effects on fossil fuel markets under alternative regimes Energy Policy 30 2002 207-218
40. Hourcade J.C. Richels R. Robinson J. Estimating the costs of mitigating greenhouse gases, in: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1996 Bruce J.P. Lee H. Haites E.F. Climate Change 1995-Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change 1996 263-296 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
41. Jacoby, H.D., 1998. The Uses and Misuses of Technology Development as a Component of Climate Policy, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 43, Cambridge, MA
42. Jakeman, G., Heyhoe, E., Pant, H., Woffenden, K., Fisher, B.S., 2001 The Kyoto Protocol, Economic Impacts under the Terms of the Bonn Agreement, ABARE conference paper 2001.28, Canberra
43. Jensen, J., Thelle, M.H., 2001. What are the Gains from a Multi-Gas Strategy? FEEM working paper 84.2001, Milan
44. Jotzo F. Michaelowa A. Estimating the CDM Market under the Marrakech Accords Climate Policy 2 2002 179-196
45. Kainuma, M., Matsuoka, Y., Morita, T., 1999. Analysis of Post-Kyoto scenarios: The Asian-Pacific integrated model, In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 207-220
46. Kanudia, A., Loulou, R., 1998. Joint Mitigation under the Kyoto Protocol: A Canada-USA-India Case Study, GERAD discussion paper G-98-40, Montreal
47. Kemfert, C., 2000. The Impacts of Emissions Trading on World Economies. Contemplation of Baseline Emissions Paths and a Ceiling on Emissions Trading, FEEM working paper 1.00, Milan
48. Kurosawa, A., Yagita, H., Zhou, W., Tokimatsu, K., Yanagisawa, Y., 1999. Analysis of carbon emission stabilization targets and adaptation by integrated assessment model. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 157-175
49. Löschel A. Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey Ecol. Econ. 43 2002 105-126
50. Löschel A. Zhang Z.X. The Economic and Environmental Implications of the US Repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the Subsequent Deals in Bonn and Marrakech Weltwirtschaftlich. Arch. 138 2002 711-746
51. MacCracken, C.N., Edmonds, J.A., Kim, S.H., Sands, R.D., 1999. The economics of the Kyoto Protocol, In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 25-71
52. Manne, A.S., Richels, R.G., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A cost-effective strategy for meeting environmental objectives? In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, 1-23
53. Manne, A.S., Richels, R.G., 2000. A Multi-Gas Approach to Climate Policy-with and without GWPs, Paper presented at the EMF-19 Workshop in Washington, DC on March 22-23, 2000
54. 2 emissions, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper 01-12
55. McKibbin W.J. Shackleton R. Wilcoxen P.J. What to expect from an international system of tradable permits for carbon emissions Resour. Energy Econ. 21 1999a 319-346
56. McKibbin, W.J., Ross, M.T., Shackleton, R., Wilcoxen, P.J., 1999b. Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto Protocol. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 287-333
57. McKibbin W.J. Wilcoxen P.J. The role of economics in climate change policy J. Econ. Perspect. 16 2002 107-129
58. Messner S. Endogenised technological learning in an energy system model J. Evol. Econ. 7 1997 291-313
59. Missfeldt F. Haites E. Analysis of a commitment period reserve at national and global levels Clim. Policy 2 2002 51-70
60. Nordhaus, W.D., Boyer, J.G., 1999. Requiem for Kyoto: An economic analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, pp. 93-130
61. Nordhaus W.D. Global warming economics Science 294 2001 1283-1284
62. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2001. OECD Historical Statistics: 1970-1999, OECD, Paris
63. Pizer W.A. Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change J. Publ. Econ. 85 2002 409-434
64. Reilly J. Prinn R. Harnisch J. et al. Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Nature 401 1999 549-555
65. Rose A. Stevens B. An economic analysis of flexible permit trading in the Kyoto Protocol Int. Environ. Agreements 1 2001 219-242
66. Seebregts, A.J., Kram, T., Schaeffer, G.J., et al., 1999. Endogenous Technological Change in Energy System Models. Synthesis of Experience with ERIS, MARKAL, and MESSAGE, ECN report C-99-025, Petten, The Netherlands
67. Sijm, J.P.M., Ormel, F.T., Martens, J.W., et al., 2000. Kyoto Mechanisms. The Role of Joint Implementation, the Clean Development Mechanism and Emissions Trading in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions, ECN report C-00-026, Petten, The Netherlands
68. Stevens B. Rose A. An dynamic analysis of the marketable permits approach to global warming policy: A comparison of spatial and temporal flexibility J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 44 2002 45-69
69. Tulpulé, V., Brown, S., Lim, J., Polidano, C., Pant, H., Fisher, B.S., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: an economic analysis using GTEM. In: Weyant, J. (Ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue, 257-285
70. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2000. UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics, United Nations, New York and Geneva
71. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 1999. Submission by Germany on behalf of the European Community, its Member States and Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovak Republic and Slovenia on Joint Implementation (Art. 6 KP) (FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.3/Add.3)
72. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2001. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001, Addendum, Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties, Vol. I. (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1)
73. van der Mensbrugghe, D., 1998. A (Preliminary) analysis of the Kyoto Protocol: using the OECD GREEN Model, In: OECD, 1998, Economic Modelling of Climate Change, OECD, Paris
74. Van der Zwaan B.C.C. Gerlagh R. Klaassen G. Schrattenholzer L. Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling Energy Econ. 24 2002 1-19
75. Victor D.G. Nakicenovic N. Victor N. The Kyoto Protocol emission allocations: Windfall surpluses for Russia and Ukraine Clim. Change 49 2001 263-277
76. Weyant, J. (Ed.), 1999. The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, Energy J., Special Issue
77. Weyant J. Davidson O. Dowlatabadi H. et al. Integrated assessment of climate change: An overview and comparison of approaches and results, in: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1996 Bruce J.P. Lee H. Haites E.F. Climate Change 1995-Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change 1996 367-396 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
78. Zhang Z.X. Folmer H. Economic modelling approaches to cost estimates for the control of carbon dioxide emissions Energy Econ. 20 1998 101-120
79. Zhang Z.X. Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto mechanisms Weltwirtschaftlich. Arch. 136 2000 491-520
80. Zhang Z.X. An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms Ecol. Econ. 37 2001 53-69