Intraosseous ultrasound in the placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 400-407

  Kantelhardt, Sven R ^a   Bock, Christoph H ^a   Larsen, Jörg ^a   Bockermann, Volker ^a   Schillinger, Wolfgang ^a   Rohde, Veit ^a   Giese, Alf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone sonography; Lumbar spine; Lumbar spine fixation; Pedicle screw placement; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LUMBAR SPINE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BONE SCREWS; CADAVER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 64749105814     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819286ca     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Guigui P, Devyver B, Rillardon L, et al. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: prospective analysis of 872 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2004;90:5-15 [in French].
2. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2232-7.
3. Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR. Clinical accuracy of cervicotho-racic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the "open" lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:25-32.
4. Papadopoulos EC, Girardi FP, Sama A, et al. Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery. Spine J 2005;5:263-7.
5. Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Robert Kolen E, Jun P, et al. Accuracy over space and time of computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation in the lumbar spine in vivo. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:109-13.
6. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine 1997;22:452-8.
7. Gü ven O, Yalçin S, Karahan M, et al. Postoperative evaluation of transpe-dicular screws with computed tomography. Orthop Rev 1994;23:511-6.
8. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000;9:235-40.
9. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 1996;21:1320-4.
10. Davne SH, Myers DL. Complications of lumbar spinal fusion with transpe-dicular instrumentation. Spine 1992;17(suppl 6):S184-9.
11. Faraj A, Webb J. Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 1997;6:324-6.
12. Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, et al. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999;81:1519-28.
13. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA,et al. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine 2007;32:2119-26.
14. Bocksch W, Wellnhofer E, Schartl M, et al. Reproducibility of serial intra-vascular ultrasound measurements in patients with angiographically silent coronary artery disease after heart transplantation. Coron Artery Dis 2000; 11:555-62.
15. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, McFadden EP, Aoki J, et al. In vivo variability in quantitative coronary ultrasound and tissue characterization measurements with mechanical and phased-array catheters. IntJCardiovasc Imaging 2006; 22:47-53.
16. Assaker R, Reyns N, Vinchon M, et al. Transpedicular screw placement: image-guided versus lateral-view fluoroscopy: in vitro simulation. Spine 2001;26:2160-4.
17. Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, et al. Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine 2002;27:2503-8.
18. Hart RA, Hansen BL, Shea M, et al. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison of image-guided and manual techniques in cadavers. Spine 2005;30:326-31.
19. Seller K, Wild A, Urselmann L, et al. Prospective screw misplacement analysis after conventional and navigated pedicle screw implantation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2005;50:287-92 [in German].
20. Sasso RC, Garrido BJ. Computer-assisted spinal navigation versus serial radiography and operative time for posterior spinal fusion at L5-S1. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:118-22.
21. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J 2007;16:613-7.
22. Barzilay Y, Liebergall M, Fridlander A, et al. Miniature robotic guidance for spine surgery-introduction of a novel system and analysis of challenges encountered during the clinical development phase at two spine centres. Int J Med Robot 2006;2:146-53.
23. Togawa D, Kayanja MM, Reinhardt MK, et al. Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part 2-Evaluation of system accuracy. Neurosurgery 2007;60(2 Suppl 1): 129-39.
24. Cook SD, Barbera J, Rubi M, et al. Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws. an alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis. Spine J 2001; 1:109-14.