From behaviours to attributions: Further concerns regarding the evaluation of professionalism

Medical Education

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 414-425

  Ginsburg, Shiphra ^a,b   Regehr, Glenn ^b   Mylopoulos, Maria ^b  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICIAN; PROFESSIONALISM; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSIBILITY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; ONTARIO; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 64749104173     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03335.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002 77 (6 502 15.
2. Lynch DC, Surdyk PM, Eiser AR. Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature. Med Teach 2004 26 (4 366 73.
3. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000 75 (Suppl 10 6 11.
4. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. The disavowed curriculum: understanding students' reasoning in professionally challenging situations. J Gen Intern Med 2003 18 (12 1015 22.
5. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. Basing the evaluation of professionalism on observable behaviours: a cautionary tale. Acad Med 2004 79 (Suppl 10 1 4.
6. Lavine E, Regehr G, Garwood K, Ginsburg S. The role of attribution to clerk factors and contextual factors in supervisors' perceptions of clerks' behaviours. Teach Learn Med 2004 16 (4 403 8.
7. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Mylopoulos M. Reasoning when it counts: students' rationales for action on a professionalism exam. Acad Med 2007 82 (Suppl 10 40 3.
8. Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better Standards. Better Physicians. Better Care. Ottawa, ON : Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2005.
9. Creswell JW. Data collection. In : Corbin J, Strauss AL, eds. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications 1998 109 35.
10. Corbin J, Strauss AL. Strategies for qualitative data analysis. In : Corbin J, Strauss AL, eds. Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications 2008 73 4.
11. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Program, 2.0. Doncaster, Vic : QSR International Pty Ltd 2002.
12. Rees CE, Knight LV. Viewpoint: the trouble with assessing students' professionalism: theoretical insights from sociocognitive psychology. Acad Med 2007 82 (1 46 50.
13. Ginsburg S, Lingard L, Regehr G, Underwood K. Know when to rock the boat: how faculty rationalise students' behaviours. J Gen Intern Med 2008 23 (7 942 7.
14. Sabini J, Siepmann M, Stein J. The really fundamental attribution error in social psychological research. Psychol Inq 2001 12 (1 1 15.
15. Ross L, Nisbett RE. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. Boston, MA : McGraw Hill 1991 125 33.
16. Wallace DS, Paulson RM, Lord CG, Bond CF. Which behaviours do attitudes predict? Meta-analysing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Rev Gen Psychol 2005 9 (3 214 27.
17. Verkerk MA, de Bree MJ, Mourits MJ. Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS''professionalism'. J Med Ethics 2007 33 (11 663 6.
18. Veloski JJ, Fields SK, Boex JR, Blank LL. Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Acad Med 2005 80 (4 366 70.
19. Papadakis MA, Osborn MC, Cooke M, Healy K. A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behaviour in medical students. Acad Med 1999 74 (9 980 90.
20. Goldie J, Schwartz L, McConnachie A, Jolly BC, Morrison J. Can students' reasons for choosing set answers to ethical vignettes be reliably rated? Development and testing of a method. Med Teach 2004 26 (8 713 8.
21. Regehr G, Bogo M, Regehr C, Power R. Can we build a better mousetrap? Improving the measures of practice performance in the field practicum. J Soc Work Educ 2007 43 (2 327 43.