Comparing three error criteria for selecting radial basis function network topology

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 198, Issue 27-29, 2009, Pages 2137-2150

  Goel, Tushar ^a   Stander, Nielen ^a  

^a LIVERMORE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Crashworthiness; Cross validation; Metamodels; Radial basis functions network; Topology selection criterion

Indexed keywords

CROSS-VALIDATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; METAMODELS; MULTI-LEVEL OPTIMIZATIONS; NETWORK TOPOLOGIES; NUMBER OF CENTERS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS NETWORK; RADIUS OF INFLUENCES; RBF NETWORKS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SAMPLING DENSITIES; SYSTEMATIC STUDIES;

ATTITUDE CONTROL; CRASHWORTHINESS; ELECTRIC NETWORK TOPOLOGY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MEDICAL IMAGING; NEURAL NETWORKS; PRESSES (MACHINE TOOLS);

RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS;

EID: 64749096531     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kurdila A.J., and Peterson J.L. Adaptation of centers of approximation for nonlinear tracking control. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 19 2 (1996) 363-369
2. Li Y., Sundarajan N., and Saratchandran P. Stable neuro-flight controller using fully tuned radial basis function neural networks. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 24 4 (2001)
3. Young A., Cao C., Patel V., Hovakimyan N., and Lavertsky E. Adaptive control design methodology for nonlinear-in-control systems in aircraft application. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 30 6 (2007)
4. Wheeler K.R., Dhawan A.P., and Meyer C.M. Space shuttle main engine sensor modeling using radial basis function neural networks. J. Spacecraft Rockets 31 6 (1994) 1054-1060
5. Papila N., Shyy W., Griffin L., and Dorney D.J. Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using global approximation methods. J. Prop. Power 18 3 (2002) 509-518
6. Shyy W., Papila N., Vaidyanathan R., and Tucker K. Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 37 1 (2001) 59-118
7. Karakasis M.K., and Giannakoglou K.C. On the use of metamodel assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Engrg. Optim. 38 8 (2006) 941-957
8. Meckesheimer M., Barton R.R., Simpson T., Limayen F., and Yannou B. Metamodeling of discrete/continuous responses. AIAA J. 39 10 (2001) 1950-1959
9. Rocha H., Li W., and Hahn A. Principal component regression for fitting wing weight data of subsonic transports. J. Aircraft 43 6 (2006) 1925-1936
10. Zhang T., Choi K.K., Rahman S., Cho K., Baker P., Shakil M., and Heitkamp D. A hybrid surrogate and pattern search optimization method and application to microelectronics. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 32 4 (2006) 327-345
11. Reddy R.R.K., and Ganguli R. Structural damage detection in a helicopter rotor blade using radial basis function neural networks. Smart Mater. Struct. 12 (2003) 232-241
12. Glaz B., Friedmann P.P., and Liu L. Surrogate based optimization of helicopter rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 35 4 (2008) 341-363
13. Panda S.S., Chakraborty D., and Pal S.K. Flank wear prediction in drilling using back propagation neural networks and radial basis function network. Appl. Soft Comput. 8 2 (2008) 858-871
14. Lanzi L., Castelletti L.M.L., and Anghileri M. Multi-objective optimization of composite absorber shape under crashworthiness requirements. Compos. Struct. 65 3-4 (2004) 433-441
15. Fang H., Rais-Rohani M., Liu A., and Horstemeyer M.F. A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multi-objective crashworthiness optimization. Comput. Struct. 83 25-26 (2005) 2121-2136
16. Orr M.J.L. Local Smoothing of Radial Basis Function Networks, Center for Cognitive Science (1995), University of Edinburgh
17. Orr M.J.L. Regularization in the Selection of Radial Basis Function, Centers Center for Cognitive Science (1995), University of Edinburgh
18. Orr M.J.L. Introduction to Radial Basis Function Networks, Center for Cognitive Science (1996), University of Edinburgh
19. Orr M.J.L. Optimizing the Widths of Radial Basis Functions, Center for Cognitive Science (1998), University of Edinburgh
20. Orr M.J.L. Recent Advances in Radial Basis Function Networks, Institute of Adaptive and Neural Computation (1999), University of Edinburgh
21. J. Utans, J. Moody, Selecting neural network architecture via the prediction risk: application to corporate bond rating prediction, in: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications on Wall Street, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos CA, 1991.
22. Zhang P. Model selection via multifold cross validation. Ann. Stat. 21 1 (1993) 299-313
23. J. Moody, J. Utans, Architecture selection strategies for neural networks: application to corporate bond rating prediction, in:, A.N. Refenes (Ed.), Neural Networks in the Capital Markets, Wiley, 1994.
24. Anderson T., and Martinez T. Cross validation and MLP architecture selection. Neural Networks 3 (1999) 1614-1619
25. C.E. Vasios, G.K. Matsopoulos, E.M. Ventouras, K.S. Nikita, N. Uzunoglu, Cross-validation and neural network architecture selection for the classification of intracranial current sources, in: Proceedings of 7th Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering (NEUREL 2004), Belgrade, September 2004, pp. 151-185.
26. Chen S., Cowan C.F.N., and Grant P.M. Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2 2 (1991) 302-309
27. Mullur A.A., and Messac A. Extended radial basis functions: more flexible and effective metamodeling. AIAA J. 43 6 (2005) 1306-1315
28. Hardy R.L. Multiquadrics equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. 76 (1991) 1905-1915
29. Tikhonov A.N., and Arsenin V.Y. Solutions to Ill-Posed Problems (1977), Wiley, New York
30. Golub G., Heath M., and Wahba G. Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21 2 (1979) 215-223
31. Golub G.H., and von Matt U. Generalized cross-validation for large scale problems. J. Comput. Graphical Stat. 6 1 (1997) 1-34
32. Stander N., Roux W., Goel T., Eggleston T., and Craig K. LS-OPT Manual vol. 3.4 (2007), Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore CA
33. Goel T., Haftka R.T., Shyy W., and Queipo N.V. Ensemble of Surrogates. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 33 (2007) 199-216
34. T. Goel, R.T. Haftka, W. Shyy, Error measures on surrogate approximation based on noise-free data, in: Proceedings of 46th AIA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, 2008, AIAA-2008-0901.
35. Dixon L.C.W., and Szego G.P. Towards Global Optimization vol. 2 (1978), North Holland, Amsterdam
36. Jin R., Chen W., and Simpson T. Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 23 1 (2001) 385-398
37. A.A. Giunta, L.T. Watson, A comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models, in: Proceedings of 7th AIAA/UAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis MO, 1998, AIAA-98-4758.
38. Craig K.J., Stander N., Dooge D.A., and Varadappa S. Automotive crashworthiness design using response surface-based variable screening and optimization. Engrg. Optim. 22 1 (2005) 38-61
39. National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC), Public Finite Element Model Archive, 2001. .
40. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, LS-Dyna Manual, vol. 971, Livermore CA, 2007.
41. A. Akkerman, R. Thyagarajan, N. Stander, M. Burger, R. Kuhm, H. Rajic, Shape optimization for crashworthiness design using response surfaces, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Pretoria SA, 2000, pp. 270-279.
42. C.W. Ueberhuber, Numerical computation 2: methods, software, and analysis, Springer, New York, p 71.
43. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology (2002), Wiley, New York
44. Goel T., Haftka R.T., Shyy W., and Watson L.T. Pitfalls of using a single criterion for selecting experimental designs. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 75 2 (2008) 127-155
45. G. Li, T. Goel, N. Stander, Assessing the convergence properties of NSGA-II for direct crashworthiness optimization, in: Proceedings of the 10th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Detroit MI, June, 2008, pp. 8-10.
46. Sanchez E., Pintos S., and Queipo N.V. Toward an optimal ensemble of kernel-based approximations with engineering applications. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 36 3 (2008) 247-261
47. F.A.C. Viana, R.T. Haftka, Using multiple surrogates for minimization of the RMS error in meta-modeling, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - IDETC/CIE 2008, New York NY, August 3-6, 2008.