Anchoring effects in the judgment of confidence: Semantic or numeric priming?

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 297-307

  Carroll, Steven R ^a   Petrusic, William M ^a   Leth Steensen, Craig ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 64749091875     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.2.297     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1994). The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 412-428.
2. Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223-242. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2901_5
3. Henmon, V. A. C. (1911). The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. Psychological Review, 18, 186-201. doi:10.1037/h0074579
4. Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-1166. doi:10.1177/01461672952111004
5. Lammertyn, J., & Fias, W. (2005). Negative priming with numbers: No evidence for a semantic locus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1153-1172. doi:10.1080/02724980443000520
6. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
7. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2001). The semantics of anchoring. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 86, 234-255. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2954
8. Scheck, P., Meeter, M., & Nelson, T. O. (2004). Anchoring effects in the absolute accuracy of immediate versus delayed judgments of learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 71-79. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.004
9. Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73, 437-446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437
10. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
11. Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2000). Is 7300 m equal to 7.3 km? Same semantics but different anchoring effects. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 82, 314-333. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2900