Business process modeling for non-uniform work

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 19, Issue , 2009, Pages 188-200

  Tarkkanen, Kimmo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Business process modeling; IS use; Model re engineering; Uniformity of work practices

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROCESS MONITORING; REENGINEERING;

BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS AND WORKFLOW; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES; GROUNDED THEORIES; INFORMATION SYSTEM INTEGRATIONS; IS IMPLEMENTATIONS; IS USE; NON UNIFORMITIES; NON-UNIFORM; PROCESS MODELS; RETAIL BUSINESS; SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; UNIFORMITY OF WORK PRACTICES; WORK ENVIRONMENTS; WORK-TASKS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 64549118692     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00670-8_14     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)
2. Wagner, E.L., Scott, S.V., Galliers, R.D.: The Creation of 'Best Practice' Software: Myth, Reality and Ethics. Information and Organization 16, 251-275 (2006)
3. Gasser, L.: The Integration of Computing and Routine Work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 3, 205-225 (1986)
4. Robinson, M.: Design for Unanticipated Use.... In: de Michelis, G., Simone, C., Schmidt, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 1993), pp. 187-202. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)
5. Koivisto, J.: Drifting Work Practices After EPR Implementation: The Case of a Home Health Care Organization. In: 4S & EASST Conference (2004)
6. Mark, G., Poltrock, S.: Shaping Technology across Social Worlds: Groupware Adoption in a Distributed Organization. In: Schmidt, K., Pendergast, M., Tremaine, M., Simone, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2003), pp. 284-293. ACM, New York (2003)
7. Nurminen, M.I., Reijonen, P., Vuorenheimo, J.: Tietojärjestelmä n Organisatorinen Käyttöönotto: Kokemuksia ja Suuntaviivoja (Organizational Implementation of IS: Experiences and Guidelines). Turku Municipal Health Department Series A, Turku (2002)
8. Reijonen, P., Sjöros, A.: Toimintatapojen Vakiintuminen Tietojärjestelmän Käyttöönoton Jälkeen (Stabilization of the Work Practices After IS Implementation). In: SoTeTiTe Conference (2001)
9. Prinz, W., Mark, G., Pankoke-Babatz, U.: Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 373-382. ACM, New York (1998)
10. Volkoff, O., Strong, D.M., Elmes, M.B.: Understanding Enterprise Systems-Enabled Integration. European journal of Information Systems 14, 110-120 (2005)
11. Koivisto, J., Aaltonen, S., Nurminen, M.I., Reijonen, P.: Työkäytäntöjen Yhtenäisyys Tietojärjestelmän Käyttöönoton jälkeen - Tapaustutkimus Turun Terveystoimen Kotisairaanhoidosta (Uniformity of Work Practices after IS Implementation - A Case Study in Home Care.) Turku Municipal Health Department Series A, Turku (2004)
12. Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process Modelling. Communications of the ACM 35, 75-90 (1992)
13. Heritage, J.: Garfinkel and Ethnometodology. Polity Press, Cambridge (1984)
14. Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge (1984)
15. Silverman, D.: Interpreting Qualitative Data. Sage, London (1993)
16. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York (1967)
17. Nurminen, M.I., Eriksson, I.: Research Notes in Information Systems Research: The 'Infurgic' Perspective. International Journal of Information Management 19, 87-94 (1999)
18. Kortteinen, B., Nurminen, M.I., Reijonen, P., Torvinen, V.: Improving IS Deployment Through Evaluation: Application of the ONION Model. In: Brown, A., Remenyi, D. (eds.) Proceedings of Third European Conference on the Evaluation of Information Technology, pp. 175-181 (1996)
19. Sharp, A., McDermott, P.: Workflow Modelling: Tools for Process Improvement and Applications Development. Artech House, London (2001)
20. Reijonen, P., Toivonen, M.: How to Be an Effective End-User? In: Dahlbom, B., Ljungberg, F., Nuldén, U., Simon, K., Stage, J., Sørensen, C. (eds.) Proceedings of IRIS 19, pp. 751-765. Gothenburg Studies of Informatics, Gothenburg (1996)
21. Yu, C.-S.: Causes Influencing the Effectiveness of the Post-implementation ERP System. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105, 115-132 (2005)
22. Ellis, C.A.: Workflow Technology. In: Beaudouin-Lafor, M. (ed.) Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 29-54. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1999)
23. Nutt, G.J.: The Evolution Towards Flexible Workflow Systems. Distributed Systems Engineering 3, 276-294 (1996)
24. Mackulak, G.T., Lawrence, F.P., Colvin, T.: Effective Simulation Model Reuse: A Case Study for Amhs Modelling. In: Medeiros, D., Watson, E., Carson, J., Manivannan, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 979-984. IEEE Press, New York (1998)
25. Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
26. Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26, 87-119 (1994)
27. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance Testing: Measuring the Fit and Appropriateness of Event Logs and Process Models. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 163-176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
28. Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Interoperability in the ProM Framework. In: Latour, T., Petit, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the CAiSE 2006 Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, pp. 619-630. Presses Universitaires de Namur, Namur (2006)