Mobile source CO 2 mitigation through smart growth development and vehicle fleet hybridization

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1704-1710

  Stone Jr , Brian ^a   Mednick, Adam C ^b   Holloway, Tracey ^b,c   Spak, Scott N ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL; HYBRID-ELECTRIC VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES; HYBRID-ELECTRIC VEHICLES; LAND DEVELOPMENT; LIGHT-VEHICLE FLEETS; MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS; MOBILE SOURCES; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORIES; SMALL AREAS; SMART GROWTHS; TRAVEL ACTIVITIES; VEHICLE FLEETS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE; ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES; MOBILE POWER PLANTS; VEHICLES;

FLEET OPERATIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

AUTOMOBILE; CARBON DIOXIDE; EMISSION; MODELING;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GROWTH CURVE; HYBRIDIZATION; MOTOR VEHICLE; POPULATION DENSITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRAVEL; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; BIOENERGY; CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EXHAUST GAS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; METHODOLOGY; POLICY; STANDARD;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; BIOELECTRIC ENERGY SOURCES; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MOTOR VEHICLES; URBAN RENEWAL; VEHICLE EMISSIONS;

EID: 64549111233     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es8021655     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Simmons, P. A.; Lang, R. E. The urban turnaround: A decade-by-decade report card on postwar population change in older industrial cities; Fannie Mae Foundation: Washington, DC, 2001.
2. Myers, D.; SungHo, R. Aging baby boomers and the generational housing bubble: Foresight and mitigation of an epic transition. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 2007, 74 (1), 17-33.
3. Nelson, A. C. Leadership for a new era. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 2006, 72 (4), 393-407.
4. Newman, P. W.; Kenworthy, J. R. Gasoline consumption and cities: A comparison of U.S. cities with a global survey. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 1989, 55 (1), 24-37.
5. Neuman, M. The compact city fallacy. J. Planning Educ. Res. 2005, 25 (1), 11-26.
6. Bae, C.-H. C. Air quality and travel behavior: Untying the knot. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 1993, 59 (1), 65-74.
7. Greene, D. L.; Schafer, A. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. transportation; PewCenter on Global Climate Change: Arlington, VA, 2003.
8. Hoffert, M. I.; Caldeira, K.; Benford, G.; Criswell, D. R.; Green, C.; Herzog, H.; Jain, A. K.; Kheshgi, H. S.; Lackner, K. S.; Lewis, J. S. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 2002, 298 (5595), 981-987.
9. Marshall, J. D. Energy-efficienturbanform. Environ. Sci Technol. 2008, 42 (9), 3133-3137.
10. Plotkin, S.; Santini, D.; Vyas, A.; Anderson, J.; Wang, M.; Bharathan, D.; He, J. Hybrid technology assessment: Methodology, analytical issues, and interim results; Argonne National Laboratory: Argonne, IL, 2002.
11. Greene, D. L.; Plotkin, S. E. Energy futures for the U.S. transport sector. Energy Policy 2001, 29 (14), 1255-1270.
12. Schafer, A.; Jacoby, H. D. Vehicle technology under CO2 constraint: A general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 2006, 34 (9), 975-985.
13. Ogden, J. M. Where will the Hydrogen come from? Systems considerations and Hydrogen supply. In The hydrogen energy transition: Moving toward the post petroleum age in transportation; Sperling, D., Cannon, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2004.
14. Greene, D. L.; Kahn, J. R.; Gibson, R. C. Fuel economy rebound effect for U.S. households. Energy J. 1999, 20 (3), 1-31.
15. Small, K. A.; Van Dender, K. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. Energy J. 2007, 28 (1), 25-51.
16. Crane, R. The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretive review. J. Planning Lit. 2000, 15 (1), 3-23.
17. Ewing, R.; Cervero, R. Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1780, 87-114.
18. Handy, S. Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2005, 28 (2), 146-167.
19. Cervero, R.; Kockelman, K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design. Transp. Res. D 1997, 2 (3), 199-219.
20. Handy, S. Regional versus local accessibility: Implications for non-work travel. Transp. Res. Rec. 1993, 1400, 58-66.
21. Cervero, R.; Gorham, R. Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 1995, 61 (2), 210-225.
22. Stone, B.; Mednick, A C.; Holloway, T.; Spak, S. N. Is compact growth good for air quality? J. Am. Planning Assoc. 2007, 73 (4), 404-418.
23. Perry, M. Population growth in the 1990s: Patterns within the United States. Population Res. Policy Rev. 2002, 21 (1-2), 55-71.
24. Hammer, R. B.; Stewart, S. I.; Winkler, R. L.; Radeloff, V. C.; Voss, P. R. Characterizing dynamic spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940-1990 across the North Central United States. Landscape Urban Planning 2004, 69 (2-3), 183-199.
25. U.S. Census Bureau. Estimates of the intercensal population of counties 1970-1979; Washington, DC, 1982; available athttp://www.census.gov/ popest/archives/pre-1980/e7079co.txt.
26. U.S. Census Bureau. Intercensal estimates of the resident population of states and counties: 1980 to 1989; Washington, DC, 1992; available at http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/1980s/e8089co.xls.
27. U.S. Census Bureau. Time series of intercensal population estimates by county: April 1, 1990 to April 1, 2000; Washington, DC, 2002; available at http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/2000s/vintage-2001/CO-EST2001-12/.
28. U.S. Census Bureau. Annual estimates of the population for counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004; Washington, DC, 2005; available at http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/COEST2004-01.html.
29. Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. Complete economic and demographic data source (CEDDS) 2005; Washington, DC, 2005.
30. Miller, D. R.; Hodges, K. A population density approach to incorporating an urban-rural dimension into small area lifestyle clusters; Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Miami, FL, 1994.
31. Reuscher, T. R.; Schmoyer, R. L.; Hu, P. S. Transferability of nationwide personal transportation survey data to regional and local scales. Transp. Res. Rec. 2002, 1817, 25-32.
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. User's guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile source emission factor model; Washington, DC, 2003.
33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle; Washington, DC, 2005.
34. West, B. H.; McGill, R. N.; Sluder, S. S. Development and verification of light-duty modal emissions and fuel consumption values for traffic models; FHWA: Washington, DC, 1999.
35. U.S. Energy Information Agency. Annual energy outlook 2008, early release; Washington, DC, 2007.
36. Birky, A.; Greene, D.; Gross, T.; Hamilton, D.; Heitner, K.; Johnson, L.; Maples, J.; Moore, J.; Patterson, P.; Plotkin, S.; Stodolsky, F. Future U.S. highway energy use: A fifty year perspective: Draft; Office of Transportation Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2001.
37. Frumkin, H. Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Rep. 2002, 117(3), 201-217.
38. Ogden, J. M.; W., R. H.; Larson, E. D. Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines. Energy Policy 2004, 32 (1), 7-27.
39. Johnston, R. A.; Ceerla, R. Effects of land use intensification and auto pricing policies on regional travel, emissions, and fuel use; University of California Transportation Center: Berkley, CA, 1995.