On the lags between submission and acceptance: Are all referees created equal?

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 423-425

  Chong, Alberto ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52449116051     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504850010029200     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Freeman, R. (1996) Working for nothing: the supply of volunteer labor. NBER Working Paper 5435, January.
2. Glazer, J. and Rubinstein, A. (1996) What motives should guide referees? On the design of mechanisms to elicit opinions. Working Paper, New York University C.V. Starr Center Economic Research Report: 9601 January.
3. Hamermesh, D. (1994) Facts and myths about refereeing, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 153-63.
4. Laband, D. (1990) Is there value-added from the review process in economics?: Preliminary evidence from authors, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 341-53.
5. Vandermeulen, A. (1972) Manuscripts in the maelstrom: a theory of the editorial process, Public Choice, Fall, 107-11.